{"title":"Polytope Containment and Determination by Linear Probes","authors":"P. Gritzmann, V. Klee, J. Westwater","doi":"10.1112/PLMS/S3-70.3.691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the terms are used here, a body in R is a compact convex set with non-empty interior, and a polytope is a body that has only finitely many extreme points. The class of all bodies whose interior includes the origin 0 is denoted by %%. A set X is symmetric if X = -X. The ray-oracle of a body C e \"#({ is the function 0c which, accepting as input an arbitrary ray R issuing from 0, produces the point at which R intersects the boundary of C. This paper is concerned with a few central aspects of the following general question: given certain information about C, what additional information can be obtained by questioning the ray-oracle, and how efficiently can it be obtained? It is assumed that infinite-precision real arithmetic and the usual vector operations in U are available at no cost, so the efficiency of an algorithm is measured solely in terms of its number of calls to the ray-oracle. The paper discusses two main problems, the first of which—the containment problem—arose from a question in abstract numerical analysis. Here the goal is to construct a polytope P (not necessarily in any sense a small one) that contains C, where this requires precise specification of the vertices of P. There are some sharp positive results for the case in which d = 2 and C is known not to be too asymmetric, but the main result on the containment problem is negative. It asserts that when d 2 3 and the body is known only to be rotund and symmetric, there is no algorithm for the containment problem. This is the case even when there is available a certain master oracle whose questionanswering power far exceeds that of the ray-oracle. However, it turns out that even when there is no additional information about C, the following relaxation of the containment problem admits an algorithmic solution based solely on the ray-oracle: construct a polytope containing C or conclude that the centred condition number of C exceeds a prescribed bound. In the other main problem—the reconstruction problem— it is known only that C is itself a polytope and the problem is to construct C with the aid of a finite number of calls to the ray-oracle. That is accomplished with a number of calls that depends on the number of faces (and hence on the 'combinatorial complexity') of C.","PeriodicalId":142744,"journal":{"name":"Universität Trier, Mathematik/Informatik, Forschungsbericht","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universität Trier, Mathematik/Informatik, Forschungsbericht","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1112/PLMS/S3-70.3.691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
As the terms are used here, a body in R is a compact convex set with non-empty interior, and a polytope is a body that has only finitely many extreme points. The class of all bodies whose interior includes the origin 0 is denoted by %%. A set X is symmetric if X = -X. The ray-oracle of a body C e "#({ is the function 0c which, accepting as input an arbitrary ray R issuing from 0, produces the point at which R intersects the boundary of C. This paper is concerned with a few central aspects of the following general question: given certain information about C, what additional information can be obtained by questioning the ray-oracle, and how efficiently can it be obtained? It is assumed that infinite-precision real arithmetic and the usual vector operations in U are available at no cost, so the efficiency of an algorithm is measured solely in terms of its number of calls to the ray-oracle. The paper discusses two main problems, the first of which—the containment problem—arose from a question in abstract numerical analysis. Here the goal is to construct a polytope P (not necessarily in any sense a small one) that contains C, where this requires precise specification of the vertices of P. There are some sharp positive results for the case in which d = 2 and C is known not to be too asymmetric, but the main result on the containment problem is negative. It asserts that when d 2 3 and the body is known only to be rotund and symmetric, there is no algorithm for the containment problem. This is the case even when there is available a certain master oracle whose questionanswering power far exceeds that of the ray-oracle. However, it turns out that even when there is no additional information about C, the following relaxation of the containment problem admits an algorithmic solution based solely on the ray-oracle: construct a polytope containing C or conclude that the centred condition number of C exceeds a prescribed bound. In the other main problem—the reconstruction problem— it is known only that C is itself a polytope and the problem is to construct C with the aid of a finite number of calls to the ray-oracle. That is accomplished with a number of calls that depends on the number of faces (and hence on the 'combinatorial complexity') of C.