Gloss to the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 29 April 2021 in the Case of Ostrów County v the Insurance Guarantee Fund (C 383/19)

Beata Mrozowska - Bartkiewicz, Paweł Matej
{"title":"Gloss to the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 29 April 2021 in the Case of Ostrów County v the Insurance Guarantee Fund (C 383/19)","authors":"Beata Mrozowska - Bartkiewicz, Paweł Matej","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.6038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 29 April 2021, the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C 383/19 passed a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Article 3 of Directive 2009/103/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles and the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability. This judgment is of key importance for Polish insurance industry, especially for maintaining the coherence of the compulsory insurance system of motor liability insurance for motor vehicle owners for damage caused by the use of their vehicles. The social function of this obligatory insurance is inextricably linked with the protection of third parties against the effects of frequent adverse incidents resulting from the use of motor vehicles in the modern world. What is more, a compulsory insurance contract ought not to be treated as a financial burden for vehicle owners, because it both protects possible perpetrators of motor accidents from serious financial charges and prevents an excessive depletion of their assets due to civil liability. The above-mentioned judgment concerns the confirmation of the principle that in the current Polish legal system there is no possibility of either ignoring the obligation to conclude a civil liability insurance contract or being exempt from such obligation, where the owner is not able to use the vehicle for some period owing to its technical condition.\n\n","PeriodicalId":277138,"journal":{"name":"Prawo Asekuracyjne","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prawo Asekuracyjne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.6038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On 29 April 2021, the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C 383/19 passed a preliminary ruling on the interpretation of Article 3 of Directive 2009/103/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles and the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability. This judgment is of key importance for Polish insurance industry, especially for maintaining the coherence of the compulsory insurance system of motor liability insurance for motor vehicle owners for damage caused by the use of their vehicles. The social function of this obligatory insurance is inextricably linked with the protection of third parties against the effects of frequent adverse incidents resulting from the use of motor vehicles in the modern world. What is more, a compulsory insurance contract ought not to be treated as a financial burden for vehicle owners, because it both protects possible perpetrators of motor accidents from serious financial charges and prevents an excessive depletion of their assets due to civil liability. The above-mentioned judgment concerns the confirmation of the principle that in the current Polish legal system there is no possibility of either ignoring the obligation to conclude a civil liability insurance contract or being exempt from such obligation, where the owner is not able to use the vehicle for some period owing to its technical condition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟法院于2021年4月29日对Ostrów郡诉保险保证基金案的判决的注解(C 383/19)
2021年4月29日,欧盟法院在案例C 383/19中通过了对欧洲议会和理事会2009年9月16日第2009/103/EC号指令第3条的解释的初步裁决,该指令关于机动车使用民事责任保险以及对此类责任保险义务的执行。这一判决对于波兰保险业来说至关重要,特别是对于保持机动车所有者因使用其车辆而造成损害的机动车责任保险强制保险制度的一致性而言。这种强制性保险的社会功能与保护第三方免受现代世界因使用机动车辆而经常发生的不利事件的影响是密不可分的。更重要的是,强制性保险合同不应该被视为车主的经济负担,因为它既保护可能的肇事者免受严重的经济负担,又防止因民事责任而过度消耗他们的资产。上述判决涉及确认这样一项原则,即在波兰现行法律制度中,如果车主由于其技术条件在一段时间内不能使用车辆,则不可能忽视缔结民事责任保险合同的义务,也不可能免除这种义务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
W&I (warranty & indemnity) Insurance – Selected Issues Civil Liability Insurance of Companies and Members of Managing Bodies and the Amendment to the Commercial Companies Code Non-standard Insurance Recourse under Article 43 of the Act on Compulsory Insurance, the Insurance Guarantee Fund and the Polish Motor Insurers' Bureau Penalty Points for Violation of Traffic Rules versus Motor Insurance Premium. Analysis of New Legal Solutions Application of Article 18(1) and (2) of the Insurance and Reinsurance Activity Act of 11 September 2015 by Mutual Insurance Companies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1