首页 > 最新文献

Prawo Asekuracyjne最新文献

英文 中文
W&I (warranty & indemnity) Insurance – Selected Issues W&I(保证与赔偿)保险 - 选定问题
Pub Date : 2023-05-31 DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0053.6100
Anna Wietrzyńska-Ciołkowska, Paweł Stykowski
The aim of the article is to present W&I insurance, which is a type of transactional risk insurance. In transactional practice, W&I insurance is becoming a market standard in M&A processes and real estate transactions, particularly those involving commercial real estate. Nevertheless, W&I policies are still predominantly offered by foreign insurance companies, frequently under foreign law. Along with the development of accompanying title insurance and insurance for specific/defined transaction risks, including tax or environmental risks, they are becoming a tool which is increasingly applied for risk allocation, thus replacing the escrow accounts used in the past. The article describes selected practical issues related to this type of insurance.
本文旨在介绍 W&I 保险,它是交易风险保险的一种。在交易实践中,W&I 保险正在成为并购过程和房地产交易(尤其是涉及商业房地产的交易)中的市场标准。尽管如此,W&I 保单仍主要由外国保险公司提供,而且经常依据外国法律。随着附带产权保险和特定/定义的交易风险保险(包括税务或环境风险)的发展,它们正成为越来越多用于风险分配的工具,从而取代了过去使用的托管账户。本文介绍了与这类保险有关的一些实际问题。
{"title":"W&I (warranty & indemnity) Insurance – Selected Issues","authors":"Anna Wietrzyńska-Ciołkowska, Paweł Stykowski","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.6100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.6100","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is to present W&I insurance, which is a type of transactional risk insurance. In transactional practice, W&I insurance is becoming a market standard in M&A processes and real estate transactions, particularly those involving commercial real estate. Nevertheless, W&I policies are still predominantly offered by foreign insurance companies, frequently under foreign law. Along with the development of accompanying title insurance and insurance for specific/defined transaction risks, including tax or environmental risks, they are becoming a tool which is increasingly applied for risk allocation, thus replacing the escrow accounts used in the past. The article describes selected practical issues related to this type of insurance.","PeriodicalId":277138,"journal":{"name":"Prawo Asekuracyjne","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139372134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Civil Liability Insurance of Companies and Members of Managing Bodies and the Amendment to the Commercial Companies Code 公司和管理机构成员的民事责任保险及《商业公司法》修正案
Pub Date : 2023-05-31 DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0053.6101
Dominika Wolf-Jezierska
Liability insurance of corporate directors and officers covering actions and omissions related to their performance has almost become a standard insurance product in economic practice. Board members in companies are liable with all their personal assets towards the company, its partners, employees and/or creditors for their managerial performance, mismanagement or nonfeasance. The D&O insurance has been created with the aim of protecting personal property of company managers. Having regard to the changes introduced by the so-called holding law, it seems justified to consider the impact of the new legislation on the principles of liability of company managers as well as the application of the D&O insurance.
公司董事和高级职员的责任保险涵盖与其业绩有关的行为和疏忽,这几乎已成为经济实践中的一种标准保险产品。公司董事会成员因其管理业绩、管理不善或不作为而对公司、其合作伙伴、雇员和/或债权人承担全部个人财产责任。D&O 保险就是为了保护公司管理人员的个人财产而设立的。考虑到所谓的控股法所带来的变化,似乎有理由考虑新立法对公司经理责任原则以及 D&O 保险的适用所产生的影响。
{"title":"Civil Liability Insurance of Companies and Members of Managing Bodies and the Amendment to the Commercial Companies Code","authors":"Dominika Wolf-Jezierska","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.6101","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.6101","url":null,"abstract":"Liability insurance of corporate directors and officers covering actions and omissions related to their performance has almost become a standard insurance product in economic practice. Board members in companies are liable with all their personal assets towards the company, its partners, employees and/or creditors for their managerial performance, mismanagement or nonfeasance. The D&O insurance has been created with the aim of protecting personal property of company managers. Having regard to the changes introduced by the so-called holding law, it seems justified to consider the impact of the new legislation on the principles of liability of company managers as well as the application of the D&O insurance.","PeriodicalId":277138,"journal":{"name":"Prawo Asekuracyjne","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139372258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Legal Risk in Insurance Intermediarys Activity in Poland 波兰保险中介活动中的法律风险
Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0016.1073
R. Nowak
The aim of the article is to identify legal risk and key areas and factors to determine the activity of insurance intermediaries in Poland, who conduct their activity in conditions defined by both hard and soft law regulations. The author mainly focuses on such activities of insurance intermediaries that are directly related to insurance distribution. Legal risks cover events that create uncertainty about the realization of hazards resulting from legal environment in a broad sense, which constitute a threat to the entity conducting activities aimed at achieving concrete economic targets. From the point of view of an insurance intermediary acting as an insurance distributor, legal risks together with compliance risk seem to be crucial from the perspective of the threat level and possible consequences thereof. The protection against the effects of these risks requires taking appropriate steps in the risk management process adopted by individual companies. These activities are hindered by a variety of negative phenomena occurring on the insurance market, including the overregulation and legal instability. The implementation of the compliance idea and the legal risk management program by an entity conducting brokerage and agency activities mitigates the risk of illegal practices, and consequently reduces threats arising from areas generating legal risks.
本文的目的是确定法律风险和关键领域和因素,以确定波兰保险中介机构的活动,他们在硬和软法律法规规定的条件下开展活动。笔者主要关注与保险分销直接相关的保险中介机构的此类活动。法律风险是指由广义的法律环境造成的对实现危害产生不确定性的事件,这些事件对从事旨在实现具体经济目标的活动的实体构成威胁。从保险中介作为保险分销商的角度来看,从威胁程度和可能的后果来看,法律风险和合规风险似乎是至关重要的。防范这些风险的影响需要在个别公司采用的风险管理过程中采取适当的步骤。这些活动受到保险市场上出现的各种负面现象的阻碍,包括过度监管和法律不稳定。从事经纪和代理活动的实体实施合规理念和法律风险管理程序,可以降低非法行为的风险,从而减少产生法律风险的领域所产生的威胁。
{"title":"Legal Risk in Insurance Intermediarys Activity in Poland","authors":"R. Nowak","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.1073","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1073","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is to identify legal risk and key areas and factors to determine the activity of insurance intermediaries in Poland, who conduct their activity in conditions defined by both hard and soft law regulations. The author mainly focuses on such activities of insurance intermediaries that are directly related to insurance distribution. Legal risks cover events that create uncertainty about the realization of hazards resulting from legal environment in a broad sense, which constitute a threat to the entity conducting activities aimed at achieving concrete economic targets. From the point of view of an insurance intermediary acting as an insurance distributor, legal risks together with compliance risk seem to be crucial from the perspective of the threat level and possible consequences thereof. The protection against the effects of these risks requires taking appropriate steps in the risk management process adopted by individual companies. These activities are hindered by a variety of negative phenomena occurring on the insurance market, including the overregulation and legal instability. The implementation of the compliance idea and the legal risk management program by an entity conducting brokerage and agency activities mitigates the risk of illegal practices, and consequently reduces threats arising from areas generating legal risks.","PeriodicalId":277138,"journal":{"name":"Prawo Asekuracyjne","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124653241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Application of Article 18(1) and (2) of the Insurance and Reinsurance Activity Act of 11 September 2015 by Mutual Insurance Companies 互助保险公司对2015年9月11日《保险和再保险活动法》第18(1)和(2)条的适用
Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0016.1074
Beata Mrozowska - Bartkiewicz
Article 18(1) and (2) of the Act of 11 September 2015 on insurance and reinsurance activity introduced a ban on remunerating the policyholder and persons representing the policyholder in insurance on someone else's account for offering insurance cover or for actions related to the performance of insurance contracts. The reason for such legal regulation was to eliminate a market practice which enabled the policyholder to receive fees or other benefits for actions related to providing insurance cover under contracts on someone else's account (mainly group insurance) or to the performance thereof. Although said provision applies to insurers operating in various forms, mutual insurance companies implementing the principle of mutuality in their activities may account for the profit generated in the insurance history. Pursuant to Article 18(1) and (2) of the Act, the ban to receive remuneration or other benefits applies exclusively to insurance actions specified by the legislator, i.e. to (i) offering and/or (ii) performing an insurance contract. The payment or settlement of a positive insurance result does not constitute a benefit for the insured referred to in said provision. Therefore, the ban does not apply in such situation, however this does not mean that the obligation to settle accounts with persons who actually bear the cost of insurance protection may be ignored.
2015年9月11日关于保险和再保险活动的法案第18(1)和(2)条禁止向投保人和代表投保人的人支付他人账户保险或与履行保险合同有关的行为的报酬。制定这种法律规定的原因是为了消除一种市场惯例,这种惯例使投保人能够从与根据别人的帐户(主要是团体保险)提供保险或履行合同有关的行动中获得费用或其他利益。虽然上述规定适用于以各种形式经营的保险公司,但在其活动中实行互惠原则的互助保险公司可以在保险历史上核算产生的利润。根据本法第18条第(1)项和第(2)项,禁止接受报酬或其他利益仅适用于立法者指定的保险行为,即(i)提供和/或(ii)履行保险合同。积极保险结果的支付或结算不构成上述规定所述被保险人的利益。因此,禁令不适用于这种情况,但这并不意味着可以忽略与实际承担保险保护费用的人结帐的义务。
{"title":"Application of Article 18(1) and (2) of the Insurance and Reinsurance Activity Act of 11 September 2015 by Mutual Insurance Companies","authors":"Beata Mrozowska - Bartkiewicz","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.1074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1074","url":null,"abstract":"Article 18(1) and (2) of the Act of 11 September 2015 on insurance and reinsurance activity introduced a ban on remunerating the policyholder and persons representing the policyholder in insurance on someone else's account for offering insurance cover or for actions related to the performance of insurance contracts. The reason for such legal regulation was to eliminate a market practice which enabled the policyholder to receive fees or other benefits for actions related to providing insurance cover under contracts on someone else's account (mainly group insurance) or to the performance thereof. Although said provision applies to insurers operating in various forms, mutual insurance companies implementing the principle of mutuality in their activities may account for the profit generated in the insurance history. Pursuant to Article 18(1) and (2) of the Act, the ban to receive remuneration or other benefits applies exclusively to insurance actions specified by the legislator, i.e. to (i) offering and/or (ii) performing an insurance contract. The payment or settlement of a positive insurance result does not constitute a benefit for the insured referred to in said provision. Therefore, the ban does not apply in such situation, however this does not mean that the obligation to settle accounts with persons who actually bear the cost of insurance protection may be ignored.","PeriodicalId":277138,"journal":{"name":"Prawo Asekuracyjne","volume":"131 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121954062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Non-standard Insurance Recourse under Article 43 of the Act on Compulsory Insurance, the Insurance Guarantee Fund and the Polish Motor Insurers' Bureau 强制保险法第43条规定的非标准保险追索权、保险保证基金和波兰汽车保险局
Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0016.1075
J. Wojciechowski
Recourse claims are an essential aspect of insurance practice. This article concentrates on the institution of a non-standard recourse, which plays an unusual role in the legal system. The author analyses cases provided for by law in which a claim for the non-standard recourse arises. Various situations are discussed where damage has been caused by the driver: intentional damage, drink-driving, driving in a state of intoxication or under the influence of other psychotropic substances. Moreover, the following premises have been examined: taking the possession of a vehicle as a result of committing a crime, lack of driving licence and the failure to stop at the scene of the accident by the offender. The characteristic features of those claims have been highlighted in line with the views expressed in case law and jurisprudence. The author advances the thesis that non-standard recourse claim have an autonomous basis and specific nature, with both resulting from the specific provision of the Act.
追索权索赔是保险实践的一个重要方面。非标准追索权制度在法律制度中发挥着非同寻常的作用。作者分析了法律规定的非标准追索权发生的情况。讨论了驾驶员造成损害的各种情况:故意损害、酒后驾驶、在醉酒状态或在其他精神药物影响下驾驶。此外,还审查了下列前提:由于犯罪而占有车辆、没有驾驶执照以及违法者没有在事故现场停车。根据判例法和判例所表达的观点,突出了这些索赔要求的特点。本文认为,非标准追索权具有自治基础和专一性,二者都是由《合同法》的专一性规定产生的。
{"title":"Non-standard Insurance Recourse under Article 43 of the Act on Compulsory Insurance, the Insurance Guarantee Fund and the Polish Motor Insurers' Bureau","authors":"J. Wojciechowski","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.1075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1075","url":null,"abstract":"Recourse claims are an essential aspect of insurance practice. This article concentrates on the institution of a non-standard recourse, which plays an unusual role in the legal system. The author analyses cases provided for by law in which a claim for the non-standard recourse arises. Various situations are discussed where damage has been caused by the driver: intentional damage, drink-driving, driving in a state of intoxication or under the influence of other psychotropic substances. Moreover, the following premises have been examined: taking the possession of a vehicle as a result of committing a crime, lack of driving licence and the failure to stop at the scene of the accident by the offender. The characteristic features of those claims have been highlighted in line with the views expressed in case law and jurisprudence. The author advances the thesis that non-standard recourse claim have an autonomous basis and specific nature, with both resulting from the specific provision of the Act.","PeriodicalId":277138,"journal":{"name":"Prawo Asekuracyjne","volume":"191 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115183361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Penalty Points for Violation of Traffic Rules versus Motor Insurance Premium. Analysis of New Legal Solutions 违反交通规则的罚分与汽车保险费。分析新的法律解决方案
Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0016.1068
Michał P Ziemiak
An amendment to the Polish Road Traffic Code introduced a possibility for the Insurance Guarantee Fund and insurance companies (offering motor liability and motor hull insurance) to access information in the Central Drivers Registry relating inter alia information concerning road traffic offences and to penalty points imposed as a result of committing such offences. Insurance companies may consult the Registry with the Funds assistance. At the same time, under the amended Polish Insurance and Reinsurance Act, insurance undertakings may process those data (i.e. driving offences or violations of road traffic regulations and penalty points issued as a result thereof) only for the purpose of insurance risk assessment and pricing with a view of concluding motor insurance contracts (excluding carrier's liability insurance). Similar solutions have been adopted in other countries, including EU Member States. The article is an attempt at explaining and conducting an initial evaluation of the new mechanisms, as well as at answering a question about possible impact thereof upon motor insurance premiums.
《波兰道路交通法》的一项修正案规定,保险保证基金和保险公司(提供汽车责任和汽车外壳保险)有可能获得中央驾驶员登记处的资料,除其他外,这些资料涉及道路交通违法行为和因犯下这种违法行为而被处以的罚分。保险公司可向本处咨询基金的协助事宜。同时,根据修订后的《波兰保险和再保险法案》,保险公司仅可为保险风险评估和定价目的处理这些数据(即驾驶违例或违反道路交通法规以及由此产生的罚分),以便签订汽车保险合同(不包括承运人责任保险)。包括欧盟成员国在内的其他国家也采取了类似的解决办法。本文试图解释并对新机制进行初步评估,并回答有关其对汽车保险费可能产生影响的问题。
{"title":"Penalty Points for Violation of Traffic Rules versus Motor Insurance Premium. Analysis of New Legal Solutions","authors":"Michał P Ziemiak","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.1068","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1068","url":null,"abstract":"An amendment to the Polish Road Traffic Code introduced a possibility for the Insurance Guarantee Fund and insurance companies (offering motor liability and motor hull insurance) to access information in the Central Drivers Registry relating inter alia information concerning road traffic offences and to penalty points imposed as a result of committing such offences. Insurance companies may consult the Registry with the Funds assistance. At the same time, under the amended Polish Insurance and Reinsurance Act, insurance undertakings may process those data (i.e. driving offences or violations of road traffic regulations and penalty points issued as a result thereof) only for the purpose of insurance risk assessment and pricing with a view of concluding motor insurance contracts (excluding carrier's liability insurance). Similar solutions have been adopted in other countries, including EU Member States. The article is an attempt at explaining and conducting an initial evaluation of the new mechanisms, as well as at answering a question about possible impact thereof upon motor insurance premiums.","PeriodicalId":277138,"journal":{"name":"Prawo Asekuracyjne","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121438320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
On the Need to Specify the Provisions of Article 36(1) and Article 52 of the Act of 22 May 2003 on Compulsory Insurance, the Insurance Guarantee Fund and the Polish Motor Insurers' Bureau 关于需要明确2003年5月22日关于强制保险、保险保证基金和波兰汽车保险局的法案第36(1)条和第52条的规定
Pub Date : 2022-08-15 DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.9304
Beata Mrozowska - Bartkiewicz
Compulsory insurance, especially compulsory civil liability insurance, plays an immensely important social role by protecting the property interests of both injured parties and perpetrators themselves. The Compulsory Insurance Act has laid the foundations for the compulsory insurance system, by specifying, among others, the following issues: the definition of compulsory insurance, rules of concluding and performing compulsory insurance contracts, including sums guaranteed in insurance types listed in the Act, as well as the method of controlling the performance of the obligation to conclude insurance contracts. Given the considerable importance and popularity of this insurance type, it is vital that the provisions regulating the scope of liability of the insurer and of the Insurance Guarantee Fund, including the amount of the sum guaranteed, are designed precisely and unambiguously. However, the wording used by the legislator in Article 36(1) and Article 52 of the Compulsory Insurance Act: "The sum guaranteed cannot be lower than the equivalent in PLN [...]" is related to a legal problem whether insurance with a sum guaranteed that is higher than the amount indicated in the above-mentioned provisions is compulsory or whether it is rather voluntary in terms of the amount of the sum guaranteed exceeding the indicated amounts. The present article focuses on the analysis of the practices of concluding insurance contracts with the amount of cover higher than in the above-mentioned regulations, without indicating the limits determining the compulsory or voluntary nature of an insurance in question.
强制保险,特别是民事责任强制保险,在保护受害人和加害人的财产利益方面发挥着极其重要的社会作用。《强制保险法》为强制性保险制度奠定了基础,除其他外,它规定了以下问题:强制性保险的定义、订立和履行强制性保险合同的规则,包括该法所列保险类型的保证金额,以及控制履行订立保险合同义务的方法。鉴于这一保险类型的相当重要性和受欢迎程度,至关重要的是,规范保险人和保险保证基金的责任范围,包括保证金额的规定必须精确和明确地设计。但是,立法者在《强制保险法》第36(1)条和第52条中使用的措辞是:“保证金额不得低于等值兹罗提[…]],涉及一个法律问题,即保证金额高于上述规定的金额的保险,就保证金额超过上述规定的金额而言,是强制性保险,还是相当自愿的保险。本文着重分析订立保险金额高于上述条例规定的保险合同的做法,但不说明决定有关保险的强制性或自愿性的限制。
{"title":"On the Need to Specify the Provisions of Article 36(1) and Article 52 of the Act of 22 May 2003 on Compulsory Insurance, the Insurance Guarantee Fund and the Polish Motor Insurers' Bureau","authors":"Beata Mrozowska - Bartkiewicz","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.9304","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.9304","url":null,"abstract":"Compulsory insurance, especially compulsory civil liability insurance, plays an immensely important social role by protecting the property interests of both injured parties and perpetrators themselves. The Compulsory Insurance Act has laid the foundations for the compulsory insurance system, by specifying, among others, the following issues: the definition of compulsory insurance, rules of concluding and performing compulsory insurance contracts, including sums guaranteed in insurance types listed in the Act, as well as the method of controlling the performance of the obligation to conclude insurance contracts. Given the considerable importance and popularity of this insurance type, it is vital that the provisions regulating the scope of liability of the insurer and of the Insurance Guarantee Fund, including the amount of the sum guaranteed, are designed precisely and unambiguously. However, the wording used by the legislator in Article 36(1) and Article 52 of the Compulsory Insurance Act: \"The sum guaranteed cannot be lower than the equivalent in PLN [...]\" is related to a legal problem whether insurance with a sum guaranteed that is higher than the amount indicated in the above-mentioned provisions is compulsory or whether it is rather voluntary in terms of the amount of the sum guaranteed exceeding the indicated amounts. The present article focuses on the analysis of the practices of concluding insurance contracts with the amount of cover higher than in the above-mentioned regulations, without indicating the limits determining the compulsory or voluntary nature of an insurance in question.\u0000\u0000","PeriodicalId":277138,"journal":{"name":"Prawo Asekuracyjne","volume":"258 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132520051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gloss to the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 24 February 2020 in Joined Cases C-143/20 and C-213/20 on the Information Disclosure of Life Insurance Undertakings in Unit-linked Insurance Contracts 欧盟法院于2020年2月24日就联合案件C-143/20及C-213/20就连结单位保险合约中人寿保险事业的资料披露作出的判决批注
Pub Date : 2022-08-15 DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.9307
M. Szczepańska
The gloss refers to the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 24 February 2020 in joined cases C-143/20 and C-213/20 concerning information disclosure of life insurance undertakings in unit-linked life insurance. This judgment provides guidance on information obligations in this type of insurance with respect to entities whom the information is to be communicated and as regards the scope of the information provided. Said issues seem to be essential for insurance practice, yet they fail to be clearly defined by legislation in force or in case law. The gloss does not address all the questions that have been submitted to the Court, focusing only on the scope of the information obligations in unit-linked life insurance contracts.
注释系指欧盟法院于2020年2月24日就有关单位相连人寿保险中人寿保险经营者的信息披露的C-143/20及C-213/20合并案作出的判决。本判决就这类保险中对拟传达信息的实体的信息义务以及所提供信息的范围提供了指导。上述问题似乎对保险实践至关重要,但它们未能在现行立法或判例法中得到明确界定。该解释并未解决提交法院的所有问题,而只侧重于单位相连人寿保险合同中信息义务的范围。
{"title":"Gloss to the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 24 February 2020 in Joined Cases C-143/20 and C-213/20 on the Information Disclosure of Life Insurance Undertakings in Unit-linked Insurance Contracts","authors":"M. Szczepańska","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.9307","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.9307","url":null,"abstract":"The gloss refers to the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 24 February 2020 in joined cases C-143/20 and C-213/20 concerning information disclosure of life insurance undertakings in unit-linked life insurance. This judgment provides guidance on information obligations in this type of insurance with respect to entities whom the information is to be communicated and as regards the scope of the information provided. Said issues seem to be essential for insurance practice, yet they fail to be clearly defined by legislation in force or in case law. \u0000The gloss does not address all the questions that have been submitted to the Court, focusing only on the scope of the information obligations in unit-linked life insurance contracts.\u0000\u0000","PeriodicalId":277138,"journal":{"name":"Prawo Asekuracyjne","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130257882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
SFDR and Delegated Regulations – Practical Problems with Implementing New Sustainability Regulations in the Insurance Market SFDR和授权法规-在保险市场实施新的可持续性法规的实际问题
Pub Date : 2022-08-15 DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.9306
Wojciech Łuczka
The article discusses selected doubtful legal issues related to the method of implementing new obligations resulting from EU sustainability-related legislation in the insurance market. The questions examined in the article are related to SFDR provisions, such as the application of obligations to insurance agents, the material scope of the Regulation, remuneration policy or marketing provisions, as well as IDD delegated regulation implementing the concept of examining customer sustainability preferences (the issue of including the obligations in the Suitability Assessment section which is applicable in principle to brokers, and differences in definitions as to the scope of products covered by the Regulation and the Polish Insurance and Reinsurance Act). Furthermore, the article presents de lege ferenda conclusions which could help resolve several existing legal questions.
本文讨论了与欧盟可持续性相关立法在保险市场中实施新义务的方法相关的可疑法律问题。本文探讨的问题与SFDR条款有关,例如对保险代理人的义务适用、该规例的实质范围、薪酬政策或营销条款,以及IDD授权的实施审查客户可持续性偏好概念的法规(将义务包括在原则上适用于经纪人的适用性评估部分的问题)。以及《条例》和《波兰保险和再保险法案》所涵盖产品范围的定义差异)。此外,该条提出了法理上的结论,可以帮助解决几个现有的法律问题。
{"title":"SFDR and Delegated Regulations – Practical Problems with Implementing New Sustainability Regulations in the Insurance Market","authors":"Wojciech Łuczka","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.9306","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.9306","url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses selected doubtful legal issues related to the method of implementing new obligations resulting from EU sustainability-related legislation in the insurance market. The questions examined in the article are related to SFDR provisions, such as the application of obligations to insurance agents, the material scope of the Regulation, remuneration policy or marketing provisions, as well as IDD delegated regulation implementing the concept of examining customer sustainability preferences (the issue of including the obligations in the Suitability Assessment section which is applicable in principle to brokers, and differences in definitions as to the scope of products covered by the Regulation and the Polish Insurance and Reinsurance Act). Furthermore, the article presents de lege ferenda conclusions which could help resolve several existing legal questions.\u0000\u0000","PeriodicalId":277138,"journal":{"name":"Prawo Asekuracyjne","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124491915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Notification of Circumstances Likely to Give Rise to a Claim versus the and Effectiveness of Pursuing Claims under D&O Insurance Contracts 可能引起索赔的情况通知与董事及行政人员保险合同项下追索的有效性
Pub Date : 2022-08-15 DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0015.9305
Renata Orzechowska
Before concluding a D&O insurance contract, insurers request information about circumstances which are likely to give rise to a claim or proceedings against the insured in the future. Moreover, the insurance contract may impose an obligation on companies to notify the insurer of certain events that will become apparent after the conclusion of the contract. This article attempts to explain how the occurrence of the above circumstances affects the cover under D&O insurance contract with regard to claims that a company may bring against its directors and officers. The complexity of the relationship between entities covered by insurance and the structure of the insurance based on the claims-made trigger may exert certain influence on the effectiveness of the company's claims against directors and officers under insurance contract. Therefore, the article discusses only selected aspects related to the above-mentioned questions, i.e. the company's duty to inform the insurer about circumstances known before and after the conclusion of the insurance contract, as defined in Articles 815 and 818 of the Polish Civil Code, the risk of rendering the D&O insurance contract ineffective under Article 806 of the Polish Civil Code, in relation to known circumstances that occurred before the conclusion of the contract and, finally, the risk of limitation of claims under the insurance contract where the insurer has been notified of circumstances that may give rise to a claim or proceedings in the future.
在订立董事及行政责任保险合约前,保险公司会要求投保人提供有关日后可能引致申索或诉讼的情况的资料。此外,保险合同可能规定公司有义务将合同订立后显而易见的某些事件通知保险人。本文试图解释上述情况的发生如何影响董事及高级管理人员在董事及高级管理人员的索偿时,在董事及高级管理人员保险合同下的承保范围。保险实体之间关系的复杂性和基于索赔触发的保险结构可能会对公司根据保险合同向董事和高级管理人员索赔的有效性产生一定影响。因此,本文只讨论与上述问题相关的几个方面,即,根据波兰民法典第815条和第818条的定义,公司有义务将保险合同订立前后已知的情况告知保险人,根据波兰民法典第806条,就合同订立前发生的已知情况,导致D&O保险合同无效的风险,最后,保险人被告知将来可能引起索赔或者诉讼的情形的保险合同项下的赔偿限制风险。
{"title":"Notification of Circumstances Likely to Give Rise to a Claim versus the and Effectiveness of Pursuing Claims under D&O Insurance Contracts","authors":"Renata Orzechowska","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.9305","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.9305","url":null,"abstract":"Before concluding a D&O insurance contract, insurers request information about circumstances which are likely to give rise to a claim or proceedings against the insured in the future. Moreover, the insurance contract may impose an obligation on companies to notify the insurer of certain events that will become apparent after the conclusion of the contract. This article attempts to explain how the occurrence of the above circumstances affects the cover under D&O insurance contract with regard to claims that a company may bring against its directors and officers. The complexity of the relationship between entities covered by insurance and the structure of the insurance based on the claims-made trigger may exert certain influence on the effectiveness of the company's claims against directors and officers under insurance contract. Therefore, the article discusses only selected aspects related to the above-mentioned questions, i.e. the company's duty to inform the insurer about circumstances known before and after the conclusion of the insurance contract, as defined in Articles 815 and 818 of the Polish Civil Code, the risk of rendering the D&O insurance contract ineffective under Article 806 of the Polish Civil Code, in relation to known circumstances that occurred before the conclusion of the contract and, finally, the risk of limitation of claims under the insurance contract where the insurer has been notified of circumstances that may give rise to a claim or proceedings in the future.\u0000\u0000","PeriodicalId":277138,"journal":{"name":"Prawo Asekuracyjne","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130901855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Prawo Asekuracyjne
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1