Cross-seasonal effects in the American Woodcock: Conditions prior to fall migration relate to migration strategy and implications for conservation

Clayton L. Graham, Tanner K. Steeves, S. McWilliams
{"title":"Cross-seasonal effects in the American Woodcock: Conditions prior to fall migration relate to migration strategy and implications for conservation","authors":"Clayton L. Graham, Tanner K. Steeves, S. McWilliams","doi":"10.1093/ornithapp/duac011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT How postbreeding habitat quality and body composition of migratory birds carry over to influence fall migration strategies and residency merits consideration when creating cross-seasonal conservation plans, especially in breeding populations that are partial migrants. We assessed the influence of postbreeding habitat quality on departure body composition and fall migration patterns in a southern New England breeding population of American Woodcock (Scolopax minor). Woodcock that overwintered near breeding areas (n = 5) had less fat upon capture in fall and used lower quality habitat during the fall than birds that eventually departed on migration (n = 17). Woodcock that departed earlier were long-distance migrants that had inhabited higher quality landscapes prior to migration, departed with less or similar fat stores, stopped over for shorter periods on migration, and arrived earlier on their more southerly wintering areas. In contrast, woodcock that departed later were short-distance migrants that had inhabited lower quality landscapes prior to migration yet stored similar or more fat upon departure, stopped over for longer periods on migration, and arrived relatively late to their more northerly wintering areas. These differences in migration strategies were evident under the same fall environmental conditions and did not appear related to individuals responding to their own condition as would be expected if they were classic condition-based carry-over effects. As such, the southern New England breeding population of woodcock is best categorized as nonfacultative partial migrants (i.e., includes residents, short-distance migrants, and long-distance migrants) that demonstrate weak connectivity between life stages; such populations are excellent for the study of the costs and benefits of migration. The stopover and wintering areas used by woodcock in the coastal mid-Atlantic states deserve conservation and management attention in order to preserve critical habitat throughout their wintering range. LAY SUMMARY Effective conservation of migratory birds requires knowing how conditions prior to migration relate to the timing, routes, and destinations of birds during migration. We used VHF radiotelemetry to track American Woodcock (Scolopax minor) in southern New England throughout the summer and fall, recaught them prior to fall migration and used the deuterium-dilution method to nondestructively estimate their departure body composition, and then used GPS radiotelemetry to track them every few days throughout fall migration until they reached their wintering areas. At the time of fall migration, resident woodcocks were less fat than individuals that eventually migrated. Migratory woodcock that inhabited higher quality landscapes in the fall departed earlier and, with less or similar fat stores, stopped over for shorter periods on migration, and arrived earlier on their more southerly wintering areas than birds that inhabited lower quality landscapes. However, if we assume fattening rates were maximal for woodcock inhabiting higher quality landscapes, then departure fat of woodcock was similar in different quality landscapes. Given that this southern New England breeding population of woodcock included residents that overwintered as well as short- and long-distance migrants, these woodcock are best categorized as nonfacultative partial migrants. To preserve such variation in migratory strategies requires conserving key stopover and overwintering areas in the coastal mid-Atlantic and southeastern United States.","PeriodicalId":125764,"journal":{"name":"Ornithological Applications","volume":"192 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ornithological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duac011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT How postbreeding habitat quality and body composition of migratory birds carry over to influence fall migration strategies and residency merits consideration when creating cross-seasonal conservation plans, especially in breeding populations that are partial migrants. We assessed the influence of postbreeding habitat quality on departure body composition and fall migration patterns in a southern New England breeding population of American Woodcock (Scolopax minor). Woodcock that overwintered near breeding areas (n = 5) had less fat upon capture in fall and used lower quality habitat during the fall than birds that eventually departed on migration (n = 17). Woodcock that departed earlier were long-distance migrants that had inhabited higher quality landscapes prior to migration, departed with less or similar fat stores, stopped over for shorter periods on migration, and arrived earlier on their more southerly wintering areas. In contrast, woodcock that departed later were short-distance migrants that had inhabited lower quality landscapes prior to migration yet stored similar or more fat upon departure, stopped over for longer periods on migration, and arrived relatively late to their more northerly wintering areas. These differences in migration strategies were evident under the same fall environmental conditions and did not appear related to individuals responding to their own condition as would be expected if they were classic condition-based carry-over effects. As such, the southern New England breeding population of woodcock is best categorized as nonfacultative partial migrants (i.e., includes residents, short-distance migrants, and long-distance migrants) that demonstrate weak connectivity between life stages; such populations are excellent for the study of the costs and benefits of migration. The stopover and wintering areas used by woodcock in the coastal mid-Atlantic states deserve conservation and management attention in order to preserve critical habitat throughout their wintering range. LAY SUMMARY Effective conservation of migratory birds requires knowing how conditions prior to migration relate to the timing, routes, and destinations of birds during migration. We used VHF radiotelemetry to track American Woodcock (Scolopax minor) in southern New England throughout the summer and fall, recaught them prior to fall migration and used the deuterium-dilution method to nondestructively estimate their departure body composition, and then used GPS radiotelemetry to track them every few days throughout fall migration until they reached their wintering areas. At the time of fall migration, resident woodcocks were less fat than individuals that eventually migrated. Migratory woodcock that inhabited higher quality landscapes in the fall departed earlier and, with less or similar fat stores, stopped over for shorter periods on migration, and arrived earlier on their more southerly wintering areas than birds that inhabited lower quality landscapes. However, if we assume fattening rates were maximal for woodcock inhabiting higher quality landscapes, then departure fat of woodcock was similar in different quality landscapes. Given that this southern New England breeding population of woodcock included residents that overwintered as well as short- and long-distance migrants, these woodcock are best categorized as nonfacultative partial migrants. To preserve such variation in migratory strategies requires conserving key stopover and overwintering areas in the coastal mid-Atlantic and southeastern United States.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国伍德考克的跨季节效应:秋季迁徙前的条件与迁徙策略和保护的含义有关
在制定跨季节保护计划时,特别是在部分迁徙的繁殖种群中,候鸟的繁殖后栖息地质量和身体组成如何影响秋季迁徙策略和居住值得考虑。研究了新英格兰南部美洲鹬(Scolopax minor)繁殖种群繁殖后生境质量对离场体组成和秋季迁徙模式的影响。在繁殖区附近越冬的伍德考克(n = 5)在秋季捕获时脂肪较少,并且在秋季使用的栖息地质量较差,最终离开迁徙的鸟类(n = 17)。启程较早的伍德考克是长途迁徙者,他们在迁徙前居住在高质量的景观中,携带较少或相似的脂肪储备,在迁徙过程中停留的时间较短,更早到达更靠南的越冬地区。相比之下,较晚离开的伍德考克是短途迁徙者,在迁徙之前居住在质量较低的景观中,但在离开时储存了类似或更多的脂肪,在迁徙中停留的时间更长,相对较晚到达更北的越冬地区。在相同的环境条件下,这些迁移策略的差异是明显的,如果它们是典型的基于条件的结转效应,那么它们似乎与个体对自身条件的反应无关。因此,新英格兰南部的伍德考克繁殖种群最好被归类为非兼性部分迁徙(即,包括居民、短距离迁徙和长途迁徙),它们在生命阶段之间表现出较弱的连通性;这样的人口对于研究移民的成本和收益是极好的。伍德考克在大西洋中部沿海各州的中途停留区和越冬区值得保护和管理,以保护整个越冬范围内的关键栖息地。要想有效地保护候鸟,就必须了解候鸟迁徙前的条件与迁徙时间、迁徙路线和迁徙目的地之间的关系。在整个夏季和秋季,我们使用甚高频无线电遥测技术跟踪新英格兰南部的美洲伍德考克(小角鹬),在秋季迁徙之前捕获它们,并使用氘稀释法无损地估计它们的离开身体成分,然后在秋季迁徙期间每隔几天使用GPS无线电遥测技术跟踪它们,直到它们到达越冬区。在秋季迁徙的时候,居住的伍德考克比最终迁徙的个体要少得多。栖息在高质量景观的候鸟在秋季离开得更早,脂肪储备更少或相似,在迁徙过程中停留的时间更短,比栖息在低质量景观的候鸟更早到达更靠南的越冬地区。但是,如果我们假设高质量景观中伍德考克的增肥率最大,那么不同质量景观中伍德考克的离体脂肪是相似的。考虑到新英格兰南部的伍德考克繁殖种群包括越冬的居民以及短途和长途迁徙者,这些伍德考克最好被归类为非兼性部分迁徙者。为了保持这种迁徙策略的变化,需要保护大西洋中部沿海地区和美国东南部的主要中途停留区和越冬区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cellular network measurements can unravel spatiotemporal properties of bird movement to enhance basic and applied knowledge globally Cellular network measurements can unravel spatiotemporal properties of bird movement to enhance basic and applied knowledge globally The Amazon Basin’s rivers and lakes support Nearctic-breeding shorebirds during southward migration Two listeners detect slightly more birds than a single listener when interpreting acoustic recordings Despite short-lived changes, COVID-19 pandemic had minimal large-scale impact on citizen science participation in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1