Comparing the Effectiveness of L2 Extensive and Intensive Listening Approaches

Omar Karlin, Sayaka Karlin
{"title":"Comparing the Effectiveness of L2 Extensive and Intensive Listening Approaches","authors":"Omar Karlin, Sayaka Karlin","doi":"10.56498/3112021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the fall semester of 2019, 237 Japanese university students were placed into three groups, 97 in an extensive listening group, 104 in an intensive listening group, and 42 in a control group. Participants were given a 100-question TOEIC listening test to assess L2 listening proficiency and then placed into their respective groups. During the 14-week semester, students completed six listening assignments adhering to either principle of extensive or intensive listening (as well as a control group that received no L2 listening homework). At the end of the semester, students were given another 100-question TOEIC listening test. Results indicated that the mean difference between the pre and post-test scores was significantly larger for the EL group than the IL group t(193) = 2.14, p <.05. Among the suggestions for future research are a codification of EL and IL methodologies, a linkage of testing instruments to account for variability in testing conditions, and greater scrutiny of the participants' adherence to the intervention.","PeriodicalId":332189,"journal":{"name":"English as a Foreign Language International Journal","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English as a Foreign Language International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56498/3112021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the fall semester of 2019, 237 Japanese university students were placed into three groups, 97 in an extensive listening group, 104 in an intensive listening group, and 42 in a control group. Participants were given a 100-question TOEIC listening test to assess L2 listening proficiency and then placed into their respective groups. During the 14-week semester, students completed six listening assignments adhering to either principle of extensive or intensive listening (as well as a control group that received no L2 listening homework). At the end of the semester, students were given another 100-question TOEIC listening test. Results indicated that the mean difference between the pre and post-test scores was significantly larger for the EL group than the IL group t(193) = 2.14, p <.05. Among the suggestions for future research are a codification of EL and IL methodologies, a linkage of testing instruments to account for variability in testing conditions, and greater scrutiny of the participants' adherence to the intervention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第二语言泛读听力和精读听力的有效性比较
在2019年秋季学期,237名日本大学生被分为三组,97人在广泛听力组,104人在强化听力组,42人在对照组。参与者先做了100道托业听力测试,以评估第二语言的听力水平,然后被分到各自的小组。在为期14周的学期中,学生们完成了六项听力作业,这些作业遵循了广泛或强化听力的原则(以及没有收到第二语言听力作业的对照组)。学期结束时,学生们又进行了一次100道托业听力测试。结果显示,EL组测试前和测试后得分的平均差异显著大于IL组t(193) = 2.14, p < 0.05。在对未来研究的建议中,包括对EL和IL方法的编纂,测试工具的联系,以解释测试条件的可变性,以及对参与者对干预的坚持进行更严格的审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using Genre-based Pedagogy to Teach Structural Staging of Short Persuasive Essays in a Japanese University Context Dynamics of a Social Language Learning Community: Beliefs, Membership and Identity (2020) Emergency Remote Teaching and the Effects of Online Debate on L2 Speaking Anxiety: Pre-service English Language Teachers’ Perspectives Changing Authenticity in English Language Textbooks in Hong Kong: An Ontogenetic Analysis Teachers’ Beliefs and Purposes of L1 Use and Its Effects on Students’ Oral English Improvement in Selected Primary Schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1