mRNA Vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 are “95% Effective”: What Does That Mean?

Colin A. Ross
{"title":"mRNA Vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 are “95% Effective”: What Does That Mean?","authors":"Colin A. Ross","doi":"10.31038/jnnc.2020344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"J Neurol Neurocrit Care, Volume 3(4): 1–1, 2020 In a recent paper, Polack et al. [1], who are members of the C4591001 Clinical Trial Group, stated that the Pfizer vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 is 95% effective. The Clinical Trial Group and their paper are funded by BioNTech and Pfizer. The statement that the mRNA vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 manufactured by Pfizer and Modern are 95% effective has been made countless times in the media and by the heads of the CDC and NIAID and other physicians and public health authorities. But what does “95% effective” actually mean? It is a relative risk number. What are the raw data reported by Polack et al. [1]? In their trial, 21,720 participants received the active vaccine and 21,728 received placebo. Altogether, 162 participants in the placebo group developed COVID-19 illness compared to 8 in the vaccine group; 9 participants in the placebo group developed severe COVID-19 disease compared to 1 in the vaccine group. This is a reduction in COVID-19 illness of 95% (the rate of illness in the vaccine group was 8/162 = 5% of the rate in the placebo group). There were no deaths in either group. This means that there is no evidence that mRNA vaccines reduce the risk of death from COVID-19 illness.","PeriodicalId":237353,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology and Neurocritical Care","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology and Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31038/jnnc.2020344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

J Neurol Neurocrit Care, Volume 3(4): 1–1, 2020 In a recent paper, Polack et al. [1], who are members of the C4591001 Clinical Trial Group, stated that the Pfizer vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 is 95% effective. The Clinical Trial Group and their paper are funded by BioNTech and Pfizer. The statement that the mRNA vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 manufactured by Pfizer and Modern are 95% effective has been made countless times in the media and by the heads of the CDC and NIAID and other physicians and public health authorities. But what does “95% effective” actually mean? It is a relative risk number. What are the raw data reported by Polack et al. [1]? In their trial, 21,720 participants received the active vaccine and 21,728 received placebo. Altogether, 162 participants in the placebo group developed COVID-19 illness compared to 8 in the vaccine group; 9 participants in the placebo group developed severe COVID-19 disease compared to 1 in the vaccine group. This is a reduction in COVID-19 illness of 95% (the rate of illness in the vaccine group was 8/162 = 5% of the rate in the placebo group). There were no deaths in either group. This means that there is no evidence that mRNA vaccines reduce the risk of death from COVID-19 illness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SARS-CoV-2 mRNA疫苗“95%有效”:这意味着什么?
C4591001临床试验组成员Polack等[1]在最近的一篇论文中指出,辉瑞公司的SARS-CoV-2疫苗有效率为95%。临床试验组和他们的论文由BioNTech和辉瑞公司资助。辉瑞公司和现代制药公司生产的新型冠状病毒mRNA疫苗有效率达95%的说法,在媒体和美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)、NIAID等医生和公共卫生当局的负责人中被无数次提及。但“95%有效”到底是什么意思呢?这是一个相对的风险数字。Polack等人[1]报告的原始数据是什么?在他们的试验中,21720名参与者接种了活性疫苗,21728名参与者接种了安慰剂。安慰剂组总共有162名参与者患上了COVID-19疾病,而疫苗组只有8名;安慰剂组有9名参与者患上了严重的COVID-19疾病,而疫苗组只有1名。这意味着COVID-19发病率降低了95%(疫苗组的发病率为8/162 =安慰剂组的5%)。两组均无死亡病例。这意味着没有证据表明mRNA疫苗可以降低COVID-19疾病的死亡风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case Study and Review of the Literature Regarding Extradural Spinal Arachnoid Cyst Therapeutic Effect and Safety of Rectal Ozone Therapy in Mild and Moderate Symptomatic SARS CoV-2 Positive Patients Neurosarcoidosis: What are the Evocative Signs on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Facial Paralysis Revealing an Atypical Metastasis of Breast Cancer Ivermectin and Zuranolone: A Double Standard in the Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1