Climbing the Ladder in Crafting A Professionalism Framework for Nursing Students in South Africa

P. Bimray, K. Jooste
{"title":"Climbing the Ladder in Crafting A Professionalism Framework for Nursing Students in South Africa","authors":"P. Bimray, K. Jooste","doi":"10.37363/bnr.2023.43267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Globally, higher education institutions are faced with training nursing students to meet the healthcare demands of an ever-changing society. In nursing education, innovative ways are essential to instil professionalism among nursing students to prepare them for managing complex practice issues without compromising the professional standards of nursing.  This paper concentrates on developing a conceptual framework, for the facilitation of professionalism among undergraduate nursing students at a higher education institution in South Africa. \nMethods: This study was a constructive paradigm research with qualitative descriptive approach. Data was collected by focus group interviews with participants (three cases). Different phases were followed in the framework development using the case method. In Case 1, focus groups (n=8) were held with student nurses from each of the levels of a four-year degree program (n=42). In Case 2, focus groups (n=3) and unstructured interviews (n=1) were conducted with purposively selected nurse educators (n=20), representing academics and clinical facilitators. Case 3 comprised of semi-structured individual interviews (n=5) and focus groups (n=5), a total of 29 preceptors in professional practice. An analysis of a within-case followed by cross-case data analysis, resulted in merged themes of three cases that emerged as an overall case study. \nResults: Actual accounts of the participants` experiences on nursing professionalism during theory and practice education were captured in the six concepts of the Practice Orientated Theory that structured the developed framework. \nConclusion: A logical methodological description of creating a framework on nursing professionalism was outlined and the conceptual framework can be evaluated for transferability to other similar nursing education training environments.","PeriodicalId":399016,"journal":{"name":"Babali Nursing Research","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Babali Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37363/bnr.2023.43267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Globally, higher education institutions are faced with training nursing students to meet the healthcare demands of an ever-changing society. In nursing education, innovative ways are essential to instil professionalism among nursing students to prepare them for managing complex practice issues without compromising the professional standards of nursing.  This paper concentrates on developing a conceptual framework, for the facilitation of professionalism among undergraduate nursing students at a higher education institution in South Africa. Methods: This study was a constructive paradigm research with qualitative descriptive approach. Data was collected by focus group interviews with participants (three cases). Different phases were followed in the framework development using the case method. In Case 1, focus groups (n=8) were held with student nurses from each of the levels of a four-year degree program (n=42). In Case 2, focus groups (n=3) and unstructured interviews (n=1) were conducted with purposively selected nurse educators (n=20), representing academics and clinical facilitators. Case 3 comprised of semi-structured individual interviews (n=5) and focus groups (n=5), a total of 29 preceptors in professional practice. An analysis of a within-case followed by cross-case data analysis, resulted in merged themes of three cases that emerged as an overall case study. Results: Actual accounts of the participants` experiences on nursing professionalism during theory and practice education were captured in the six concepts of the Practice Orientated Theory that structured the developed framework. Conclusion: A logical methodological description of creating a framework on nursing professionalism was outlined and the conceptual framework can be evaluated for transferability to other similar nursing education training environments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
攀登梯子,为南非护理专业学生制定专业框架
导读:在全球范围内,高等教育机构面临着培养护理学生以满足不断变化的社会对医疗保健的需求。在护理教育中,创新的方法对于向护理学生灌输专业精神至关重要,以使他们在不损害护理专业标准的情况下管理复杂的实践问题。这篇论文集中在开发一个概念框架,促进专业本科护理学生在南非高等教育机构。方法:本研究采用定性描述方法进行建构性范式研究。通过对参与者(3例)的焦点小组访谈收集数据。在使用案例方法的框架开发中遵循了不同的阶段。在案例1中,焦点小组(n=8)由来自四年制学位课程的每个级别的学生护士(n=42)组成。在案例2中,焦点小组(n=3)和非结构化访谈(n=1)与有目的地选择的护士教育者(n=20)进行,代表学者和临床促进者。案例3由半结构化的个人访谈(n=5)和焦点小组(n=5)组成,共有29名专业实践中的导师。一个案例内部的分析,然后是跨案例数据分析,导致三个案例的合并主题,作为一个整体案例研究出现。结果:参与者在理论和实践教育中对护理专业经验的实际描述被捕获在实践导向理论的六个概念中,这些概念构成了开发的框架。结论:本文概述了护理专业精神框架构建的逻辑方法描述,并对概念框架在其他类似护理教育培训环境中的可转移性进行了评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Android-based Mobile Rapid Health Assessment in the Disaster Emergency Response Phase The Effect of Role Play and Audio-Visual Interventions Based on Local Wisdom in Enhancing Disaster Preparedness Behavior among Elementary Schoolchildren The Factors of Job Satisfaction Among Nurses Enhancing Maternal Baby Massage Behavior in Makassar City through AH Baby Massage-Based Training Analysis of Leadership Internal Control and Employee Commitment on Employee Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1