Which visual programming language best suits each school level? A look at Alice, iVProg, and Scratch

Marcos Devaner do Nascimento, I. M. Félix, B. M. Ferreira, Lucas Mendonça de Souza, D. Dantas, L. de Oliveira Brandão, Anarosa de Oliveira Brandão
{"title":"Which visual programming language best suits each school level? A look at Alice, iVProg, and Scratch","authors":"Marcos Devaner do Nascimento, I. M. Félix, B. M. Ferreira, Lucas Mendonça de Souza, D. Dantas, L. de Oliveira Brandão, Anarosa de Oliveira Brandão","doi":"10.1109/EDUNINE.2019.8875788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies show that visual programming languages (VPL) may favorably be used for introducing programming. Several tools to support VPL are available for teaching programming, but these diversity makes it difficult for teachers to know which one is better suited to a particular student profile. In addition, the adoption of VPL without a methodology, that suits the student's profile, might negatively impact their learning. In this work, we perform a comparative analysis between some existing VPL software, like Alice, Scratch and iVProg with the aim of presenting their main characteristics and making a comparative analysis of their specifications and suitable level schooling. The results show that, although existing VPL have common characteristics, in some cases, they have specificities in relation suitable users.","PeriodicalId":211092,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE World Conference on Engineering Education (EDUNINE)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE World Conference on Engineering Education (EDUNINE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUNINE.2019.8875788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Studies show that visual programming languages (VPL) may favorably be used for introducing programming. Several tools to support VPL are available for teaching programming, but these diversity makes it difficult for teachers to know which one is better suited to a particular student profile. In addition, the adoption of VPL without a methodology, that suits the student's profile, might negatively impact their learning. In this work, we perform a comparative analysis between some existing VPL software, like Alice, Scratch and iVProg with the aim of presenting their main characteristics and making a comparative analysis of their specifications and suitable level schooling. The results show that, although existing VPL have common characteristics, in some cases, they have specificities in relation suitable users.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哪种可视化编程语言最适合每个学校级别?看看Alice, iVProg和Scratch
研究表明,可视化编程语言(VPL)可以很好地用于介绍程序设计。有几种支持VPL的工具可用于教学编程,但是这些多样性使得教师很难知道哪种工具更适合特定的学生。此外,采用VPL而没有适合学生的方法,可能会对他们的学习产生负面影响。在这项工作中,我们对现有的一些VPL软件进行了比较分析,如Alice, Scratch和iVProg,目的是展示它们的主要特点,并对它们的规格和适合的教育水平进行比较分析。结果表明,虽然现有VPL具有共性,但在某些情况下,它们在适合的用户方面具有特殊性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Work in Progress: Design and implementation of a didactic module with manual interface, PLC interface and PC serial interface for teaching process control techniques Artificial intelligence as a support technique for university learning Constructing Writing Assignments For First-Year Engineering Students Assessment of the Social Competence of Teamwork as Part of the Training of Civil Engineers of an Engineering School in Lima Mobile apps use in indigenous languaje education of pre school children of Huitoto people in Peruvian Amazon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1