TEDQuiz: Automatic Quiz Generation for TED Talks Video Clips to Assess Listening Comprehension

Yi-Ting Huang, Ya-Min Tseng, Yeali S. Sun, Meng Chang Chen
{"title":"TEDQuiz: Automatic Quiz Generation for TED Talks Video Clips to Assess Listening Comprehension","authors":"Yi-Ting Huang, Ya-Min Tseng, Yeali S. Sun, Meng Chang Chen","doi":"10.1109/ICALT.2014.105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last few years, researchers in the field of e-learning and Natural Language Processing (NLP) have shown an increased interest in automatic question generation. However, little research has discussed the automatic evaluation of listening comprehension in multimedia learning. In this work, we present an automatic quiz generation for TED Talks video clips, called TED Quiz. TED Quiz generates multiple-choice questions in two question types, gist-content questions and detail questions. We use a graph-based algorithm, Lex Rank, to identify the most important part of a talk, as the main concept of a gist-content question. We also proposed an approach to distractor selection for detail question generation that generates grammatically correct but semantically wrong sentences as distractors. The experimental results demonstrated that the measured results from automatically generated questions are comparable with that from manually generated questions because their scores were significantly correlated. Moreover, most subjects agreed that the generated listening comprehension questions were of quality and usefulness.","PeriodicalId":268431,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies","volume":"39 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2014.105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

In the last few years, researchers in the field of e-learning and Natural Language Processing (NLP) have shown an increased interest in automatic question generation. However, little research has discussed the automatic evaluation of listening comprehension in multimedia learning. In this work, we present an automatic quiz generation for TED Talks video clips, called TED Quiz. TED Quiz generates multiple-choice questions in two question types, gist-content questions and detail questions. We use a graph-based algorithm, Lex Rank, to identify the most important part of a talk, as the main concept of a gist-content question. We also proposed an approach to distractor selection for detail question generation that generates grammatically correct but semantically wrong sentences as distractors. The experimental results demonstrated that the measured results from automatically generated questions are comparable with that from manually generated questions because their scores were significantly correlated. Moreover, most subjects agreed that the generated listening comprehension questions were of quality and usefulness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动测验生成的TED演讲视频剪辑,以评估听力理解
近年来,电子学习和自然语言处理(NLP)领域的研究人员对自动问题生成越来越感兴趣。然而,多媒体学习中听力理解的自动评价研究却很少。在这项工作中,我们提出了一个TED演讲视频剪辑的自动测验生成,称为TED测验。TED Quiz会生成两种类型的选择题,即要点题和细节题。我们使用基于图的算法,Lex Rank,来识别演讲中最重要的部分,作为要点-内容问题的主要概念。我们还提出了一种用于细节问题生成的干扰因素选择方法,该方法生成语法正确但语义错误的句子作为干扰因素。实验结果表明,自动生成问题的测量结果与人工生成问题的测量结果具有可比性,因为它们的得分显著相关。此外,大多数被试都认为生成的听力理解题质量好、有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adaptive Recommendations to Students Based on Working Memory Capacity It's All about Time: Towards the Real-Time Evaluation of Collaborative Activities Learning Design for Online Language Learning: A Systems Design Framework The Learning Object Triangle An Analytic Frame and Multi-method Approach to Measure Teamwork Competency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1