Groundwater Governance and the Construction of Legal Indicators for Brazilian States

P. Villar, R. Hirata
{"title":"Groundwater Governance and the Construction of Legal Indicators for Brazilian States","authors":"P. Villar, R. Hirata","doi":"10.1590/1809-4422asoc20210037r1vu2022l1ao","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The 1988 Brazilian Federal Constitution granted a leading role in groundwater governance to the states and the Federal District. However, there are no studies evaluating how these entities conducted this process from a national public policy perspective. The present article aims to identify national legal obligations related to groundwater governance and develop a tool to determine whether the states have appropriately implemented them. Our methodology includes document analysis and interviews. The federal legislation provided standard mechanisms for state management, allowing for structuring a Groundwater Governance Assessment System (SAGAS: the acronym in Portuguese) that comprises 48 primary and 25 secondary indicators. SAGAS is a methodological effort to create a legal indicator to generate comparable and systematized data on states’ environment of governance to help identify management weaknesses.","PeriodicalId":261125,"journal":{"name":"Ambiente & Sociedade","volume":"27 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ambiente & Sociedade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc20210037r1vu2022l1ao","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The 1988 Brazilian Federal Constitution granted a leading role in groundwater governance to the states and the Federal District. However, there are no studies evaluating how these entities conducted this process from a national public policy perspective. The present article aims to identify national legal obligations related to groundwater governance and develop a tool to determine whether the states have appropriately implemented them. Our methodology includes document analysis and interviews. The federal legislation provided standard mechanisms for state management, allowing for structuring a Groundwater Governance Assessment System (SAGAS: the acronym in Portuguese) that comprises 48 primary and 25 secondary indicators. SAGAS is a methodological effort to create a legal indicator to generate comparable and systematized data on states’ environment of governance to help identify management weaknesses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地下水治理与巴西各州法律指标的构建
1988年巴西联邦宪法赋予各州和联邦区在地下水治理方面的主导地位。然而,没有研究从国家公共政策的角度评估这些实体如何进行这一进程。本文旨在确定与地下水治理有关的国家法律义务,并开发一种工具来确定各国是否适当地实施了这些义务。我们的研究方法包括文献分析和访谈。联邦立法为国家管理提供了标准机制,允许构建地下水治理评估系统(SAGAS:葡萄牙语首字母缩略词),该系统包括48个主要指标和25个次要指标。SAGAS是一项方法论上的努力,旨在创建一个法律指标,以生成有关各州治理环境的可比和系统化数据,以帮助确定管理弱点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Identifying Priorities through the Problem Structuring Method to Reduce the Dependencies on Ecosystem Services in Electricity Distribution Valuation of the air quality regulation ecosystem service: impacts from a Brazilian Northeast industrial complex Identificação de Prioridades Através do Método de Estruturação de Problemas Para Reduzir as Dependências dos Serviços Ecossistêmicos na Distribuição de Eletricidade Estado atual, atrativos e entraves para o ecoturismo em unidades de conservação do Amapá, Brasil Rupturas a partir de la “política de la boiada”: Un análisis según los Objetivos del Desarrollo Sostenible
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1