B. Kinne, Linnea Christine Bays, Kara Lynne Fahlen, J. Owens
{"title":"Somatic Tinnitus and Manual Therapy: A Systematic Review","authors":"B. Kinne, Linnea Christine Bays, Kara Lynne Fahlen, J. Owens","doi":"10.33552/OJOR.2019.01.000510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In 2016, a systematic review was conducted to examine the effects of physical therapy interventions on individuals with subjective tinnitus. However, the research study investigated subjective tinnitus that may not have had a somatic origin. In addition, only one of the included studies specifically assessed the effectiveness of manual therapy. Objectives: The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the effects of manual therapy techniques on individuals with somatic tinnitus. Methods: A search was performed using the following databases: CINAHL Complete, ProQuest Medical Library, and PubMed. The search terms were “somatic tinnitus” OR “somatosensory tinnitus” AND “manual therapy”. An evaluation of the evidence level for each included article was conducted using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence, and an evaluation of the methodological rigor for each included article was conducted using criteria adapted by Medlicott and Harris. Results: A qualitative synthesis was ultimately performed on eight articles. The manual therapy techniques included in this systematic review were cervical mobilizations, myofascial techniques, osteopathic manipulations, soft tissue techniques, and manual therapy as developed by the School of Manual Therapy Utrecht. This systematic review also included complementary treatment approaches such as patient education, therapeutic exercise, transcutaneous electrical neurostimulation, and home exercise programs. Conclusion: Manual therapy appears to be an effective intervention for individuals with somatic tinnitus, especially if they have co-varying tinnitus or tinnitus sensitization. In addition, a multimodal intervention approach may be the ideal way in which to positively impact an individual’s activities of daily living.","PeriodicalId":365490,"journal":{"name":"Online Journal of Otolaryngology and Rhinology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Journal of Otolaryngology and Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33552/OJOR.2019.01.000510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Background: In 2016, a systematic review was conducted to examine the effects of physical therapy interventions on individuals with subjective tinnitus. However, the research study investigated subjective tinnitus that may not have had a somatic origin. In addition, only one of the included studies specifically assessed the effectiveness of manual therapy. Objectives: The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the effects of manual therapy techniques on individuals with somatic tinnitus. Methods: A search was performed using the following databases: CINAHL Complete, ProQuest Medical Library, and PubMed. The search terms were “somatic tinnitus” OR “somatosensory tinnitus” AND “manual therapy”. An evaluation of the evidence level for each included article was conducted using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence, and an evaluation of the methodological rigor for each included article was conducted using criteria adapted by Medlicott and Harris. Results: A qualitative synthesis was ultimately performed on eight articles. The manual therapy techniques included in this systematic review were cervical mobilizations, myofascial techniques, osteopathic manipulations, soft tissue techniques, and manual therapy as developed by the School of Manual Therapy Utrecht. This systematic review also included complementary treatment approaches such as patient education, therapeutic exercise, transcutaneous electrical neurostimulation, and home exercise programs. Conclusion: Manual therapy appears to be an effective intervention for individuals with somatic tinnitus, especially if they have co-varying tinnitus or tinnitus sensitization. In addition, a multimodal intervention approach may be the ideal way in which to positively impact an individual’s activities of daily living.
背景:2016年进行了一项系统综述,研究物理治疗干预对主观性耳鸣患者的影响。然而,该研究调查了主观性耳鸣,可能没有躯体起源。此外,纳入的研究中只有一项专门评估了手工疗法的有效性。目的:本系统综述的目的是研究手工治疗技术对躯体耳鸣患者的影响。方法:使用以下数据库进行检索:CINAHL Complete、ProQuest Medical Library和PubMed。检索词为“躯体耳鸣”或“体感耳鸣”及“手法治疗”。使用牛津循证医学中心2011证据水平对每篇纳入文章的证据水平进行评估,并使用Medlicott和Harris采用的标准对每篇纳入文章的方法学严密性进行评估。结果:最终对8篇文章进行了定性合成。本系统综述中包括的手工治疗技术包括颈椎活动、肌筋膜技术、整骨疗法、软组织技术和乌得勒支手工治疗学院开发的手工治疗。该系统综述还包括补充治疗方法,如患者教育、治疗性运动、经皮神经电刺激和家庭运动计划。结论:手工疗法似乎是一种有效的干预个体与躯体耳鸣,特别是如果他们有共同变化的耳鸣或耳鸣敏化。此外,多模式干预方法可能是积极影响个人日常生活活动的理想方式。