INDICATORS OF INTERNET NON-USE IN SAMPLE SURVEYS ON ICT USE: A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS

G. Silva, L. Almeida
{"title":"INDICATORS OF INTERNET NON-USE IN SAMPLE SURVEYS ON ICT USE: A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS","authors":"G. Silva, L. Almeida","doi":"10.33965/ijwi_202018103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The digital divide/digital inclusion concepts have been of interest to policymakers, particularly since the 1990s. However, the social transformation promised with ICTs adoption and diffusion is more complicated than just providing access. Qualitative studies have emphasized the importance of analyzing skills, appropriation, and negotiation. Authors in the Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) studies and in the Science, Technology, and Society (STS) studies also argue that studying technology non-use is also valuable as it broadens the concept of user/non-user beyond a binary look, diving in to understand how people engage or disengage with technologies, besides bringing relevant outputs about why some people do not or cannot become an Internet user. In this paper, we take this approach to analyze national sample surveys carried out in the three most populated countries in Latin America and the Caribbean (Brazil, Mexico, and Colombia). Data from those surveys have directly been used to help formulate public policies in the three countries. We seek to identify indicators related to non-use present in the surveys, analyzing them in order to suggest the broadening of their scope. Besides specific questions about each survey, we find that all of them do not provide data, for example, on people who have stopped using the Internet (as a whole or part of it); do not consider people who access the network indirectly, by other people; and often bring, among motivations for non-use, sentences that do not reveal whether non-use is voluntary or involuntary. At the background of the discussion, we propose that further studies on technology non-use should be done in order to question technology determinism, the idea that everybody should and will become an Internet user.","PeriodicalId":245560,"journal":{"name":"IADIS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON WWW/INTERNET","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IADIS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON WWW/INTERNET","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33965/ijwi_202018103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The digital divide/digital inclusion concepts have been of interest to policymakers, particularly since the 1990s. However, the social transformation promised with ICTs adoption and diffusion is more complicated than just providing access. Qualitative studies have emphasized the importance of analyzing skills, appropriation, and negotiation. Authors in the Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) studies and in the Science, Technology, and Society (STS) studies also argue that studying technology non-use is also valuable as it broadens the concept of user/non-user beyond a binary look, diving in to understand how people engage or disengage with technologies, besides bringing relevant outputs about why some people do not or cannot become an Internet user. In this paper, we take this approach to analyze national sample surveys carried out in the three most populated countries in Latin America and the Caribbean (Brazil, Mexico, and Colombia). Data from those surveys have directly been used to help formulate public policies in the three countries. We seek to identify indicators related to non-use present in the surveys, analyzing them in order to suggest the broadening of their scope. Besides specific questions about each survey, we find that all of them do not provide data, for example, on people who have stopped using the Internet (as a whole or part of it); do not consider people who access the network indirectly, by other people; and often bring, among motivations for non-use, sentences that do not reveal whether non-use is voluntary or involuntary. At the background of the discussion, we propose that further studies on technology non-use should be done in order to question technology determinism, the idea that everybody should and will become an Internet user.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息通信技术使用抽样调查中不使用互联网的指标:定性分析
数字鸿沟/数字包容概念引起了政策制定者的兴趣,尤其是自20世纪90年代以来。然而,信息通信技术的采用和传播所带来的社会变革比仅仅提供接入更为复杂。定性研究强调了分析技巧、挪用和谈判的重要性。人机交互(HCI)研究和科学、技术和社会(STS)研究的作者也认为,研究技术非使用也很有价值,因为它拓宽了用户/非用户的概念,超越了二元的观点,深入了解人们如何参与或脱离技术,除了带来有关为什么有些人不成为或不能成为互联网用户的相关产出。在本文中,我们采用这种方法来分析在拉丁美洲和加勒比地区人口最多的三个国家(巴西、墨西哥和哥伦比亚)进行的全国抽样调查。这些调查的数据直接用于帮助这三个国家制定公共政策。我们设法查明调查中与不使用有关的指标,对其进行分析,以便建议扩大其范围。除了每个调查的具体问题外,我们发现所有调查都没有提供数据,例如,关于已经停止使用互联网的人(作为一个整体或一部分);不考虑那些通过他人间接访问网络的人;而且,在不使用的动机中,常常会出现一些句子,这些句子并不能说明不使用是自愿的还是非自愿的。在讨论的背景下,我们建议对技术不使用进行进一步的研究,以质疑技术决定论,即每个人都应该并且将成为互联网用户的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CONTRIBUTION OF MOBILE DEVICES TO STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING & PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS IN LABORATORY SETTINGS GES APP – MOBILE APPLICATION TO SUPPORT REFLECTION AND DOCUMENTATION OF GLOBAL EMPLOYABILITY SKILLS ENHANCING DIGITAL INCLUSION: A DUAL APPROACH TO ASSESSING HOMINERE AND SMART BREAK APP INVITING MUSIC STUDENTS TO IDENTIFY AS CONTENT CREATORS TO ENCOURAGE PARTICIPATION AND LEARNING CREATING A NEW CROWDFUNDING CHANNEL FOR SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES RESEARCH: EXPLORING THE USER NEEDS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1