New Simulation Techniques in Kinship Network Analysis

Telmo Menezes, F. Gargiulo, Camille Roth, Klaus Hamberger
{"title":"New Simulation Techniques in Kinship Network Analysis","authors":"Telmo Menezes, F. Gargiulo, Camille Roth, Klaus Hamberger","doi":"10.5070/SD992032332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thanks to new conceptual and computational tools, the analysis of kinship and marriage networks has advanced considerably over the past twenty-five years. While in the past, the discussion of empirical marriage practices was often restricted to a casual observation of salient network features, it is now easy to produce a complete census of matrimonial circuits, both between individuals and between groups. However, the abundance of structural features which have thus become accessible raises a new question: to what extent can they be taken as indicators of sociological phenomena (such as marriage preferences or avoidances), rather than as effects of chance or of observer bias? \nThis paper presents a series of recently developed simulation techniques that deal with this issue. Starting from a new approach to “classical” agent-based modeling of kinship and alliance (group) networks (Section 2), we then present an automatic model discovery technique which, instead of constructing alliance networks from given matrimonial rules, reconstructs plausible matrimonial rules underlying given alliance networks (Section 3). While these techniques apply to “objective” representations of kinship and alliance networks, we also present two methods that take into account the generally lacunar and biased character of empirical kinship datasets. The first method we propose to deal with this problem (Section 4) is a generalized version of White’s (1999) “reshuffling” approach, which consists in redistributing marriage or descent links between individuals or groups while keeping the numbers of links constant. (For alliance networks, the question can be dealt with analytically by straightforward calculation of expected marriage circuit frequencies.) The second method (Section 5) consists in simulating the processes of network exploration by a virtual fieldworker navigating through kinship or alliance networks according to given behavioral constraints.","PeriodicalId":358702,"journal":{"name":"Structure and Dynamics: eJournal of the Anthropological and Related Sciences","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structure and Dynamics: eJournal of the Anthropological and Related Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/SD992032332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Thanks to new conceptual and computational tools, the analysis of kinship and marriage networks has advanced considerably over the past twenty-five years. While in the past, the discussion of empirical marriage practices was often restricted to a casual observation of salient network features, it is now easy to produce a complete census of matrimonial circuits, both between individuals and between groups. However, the abundance of structural features which have thus become accessible raises a new question: to what extent can they be taken as indicators of sociological phenomena (such as marriage preferences or avoidances), rather than as effects of chance or of observer bias? This paper presents a series of recently developed simulation techniques that deal with this issue. Starting from a new approach to “classical” agent-based modeling of kinship and alliance (group) networks (Section 2), we then present an automatic model discovery technique which, instead of constructing alliance networks from given matrimonial rules, reconstructs plausible matrimonial rules underlying given alliance networks (Section 3). While these techniques apply to “objective” representations of kinship and alliance networks, we also present two methods that take into account the generally lacunar and biased character of empirical kinship datasets. The first method we propose to deal with this problem (Section 4) is a generalized version of White’s (1999) “reshuffling” approach, which consists in redistributing marriage or descent links between individuals or groups while keeping the numbers of links constant. (For alliance networks, the question can be dealt with analytically by straightforward calculation of expected marriage circuit frequencies.) The second method (Section 5) consists in simulating the processes of network exploration by a virtual fieldworker navigating through kinship or alliance networks according to given behavioral constraints.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亲属网络分析中的新型模拟技术
由于有了新的概念和计算工具,对亲属关系和婚姻网络的分析在过去25年里取得了相当大的进步。虽然在过去,对经验婚姻实践的讨论常常局限于对显著网络特征的偶然观察,但现在很容易对个人之间和群体之间的婚姻回路进行完整的普查。然而,大量的结构特征由此产生了一个新问题:它们在多大程度上可以被视为社会学现象(如婚姻偏好或回避)的指标,而不是作为偶然或观察者偏见的影响?本文介绍了一系列最近发展的模拟技术来处理这个问题。从“经典”基于主体的亲属关系和联盟(群体)网络建模的新方法(第2节)开始,我们提出了一种自动模型发现技术,该技术不是根据给定的婚姻规则构建联盟网络,而是在给定的联盟网络基础上重建合理的婚姻规则(第3节)。虽然这些技术适用于亲属关系和联盟网络的“客观”表示,我们还提出了两种方法,考虑到经验亲属数据集的一般空白和偏见特征。我们提出的处理这个问题的第一种方法(第4节)是White(1999)“重新洗牌”方法的广义版本,该方法包括在保持联系数量不变的情况下,在个人或群体之间重新分配婚姻或血统联系。(对于联盟网络,这个问题可以通过直接计算预期婚姻电路频率来解析处理。)第二种方法(第5节)包括通过虚拟实地工作者根据给定的行为约束在亲属关系或联盟网络中导航来模拟网络探索的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transformationality and Dynamicality of Kinship Structure Frames of Reference and Kinship Terminology Systems New Simulation Techniques in Kinship Network Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1