The role of Increasing the Number of Iterations for Numerical Methods upon Digital Image

Fatin E. M. Al-Obaidi, Ali Jassim Mohamed Ali, Khalid G. Mohammed
{"title":"The role of Increasing the Number of Iterations for Numerical Methods upon Digital Image","authors":"Fatin E. M. Al-Obaidi, Ali Jassim Mohamed Ali, Khalid G. Mohammed","doi":"10.1109/AICT47866.2019.8981760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to its numerical procedure, an expected error occurred in applying the numerical algorithms. A challenging attempt toward using such approximation methods on digital image has been utilized here. Bisection, Newton Raphson, and secant methods are some numerical techniques which have been used here for certain considerations to test their evaluation upon a digital image through investigating the role of increasing the number of iterations each time. Results show that Bisection method is the best numerical technique than other used techniques in its approximated use upon an image with least and stable absolute and relative errors. Increasing the number of iterations didn't affect its numerical procedure while an alternative errors with a bell shape resulted in the case of Newton- Raphson and secant methods. Absolute error seems to be more sensitive estimator than relative one toward detecting the suitable number of iterations that caused a least significant error","PeriodicalId":329473,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 13th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 13th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies (AICT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AICT47866.2019.8981760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to its numerical procedure, an expected error occurred in applying the numerical algorithms. A challenging attempt toward using such approximation methods on digital image has been utilized here. Bisection, Newton Raphson, and secant methods are some numerical techniques which have been used here for certain considerations to test their evaluation upon a digital image through investigating the role of increasing the number of iterations each time. Results show that Bisection method is the best numerical technique than other used techniques in its approximated use upon an image with least and stable absolute and relative errors. Increasing the number of iterations didn't affect its numerical procedure while an alternative errors with a bell shape resulted in the case of Newton- Raphson and secant methods. Absolute error seems to be more sensitive estimator than relative one toward detecting the suitable number of iterations that caused a least significant error
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增加数值方法迭代次数对数字图像的作用
由于其数值过程,在应用数值算法时出现了预期误差。在数字图像上使用这种近似方法是一个具有挑战性的尝试。二分法、牛顿·拉夫森法和割线法是一些数值技术,在这里通过研究每次增加迭代次数的作用来测试它们对数字图像的评估。结果表明,在图像的近似应用中,对分法的绝对误差和相对误差最小且稳定,是目前常用的数值方法中效果最好的。增加迭代次数对其数值过程没有影响,但在牛顿-拉夫森法和割线法中存在钟形误差。在检测引起最小误差的适当迭代次数方面,绝对误差似乎比相对误差更敏感
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geometric fractal index as a tool of the time series analysis Facial Emotion Recognition using Convolutional Neural Networks Algorithm Diagnosis of Anemia on the basis of the Method of the Synthesis of the Decisive Rules How to Design Dialogue Scenarios and Estimate Main Dialogue Parameters for a Voice-Controlled Man-Machine Interface A Conceptual Model of an Intelligent Platform for Security Risk Assessment in SMEs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1