Assessing fungal risk criteria via simulated scenarios to address disparity between method and outcomes

N. Hannah, V. Marincioni, Z. Chalabi, H. Altamirano
{"title":"Assessing fungal risk criteria via simulated scenarios to address disparity between method and outcomes","authors":"N. Hannah, V. Marincioni, Z. Chalabi, H. Altamirano","doi":"10.14293/ICMB210027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Internal wall insulation is one of the most promising methods of improving the energy efficiency of buildings while maintaining their original facades and construction. However, porous materials or poor construction quality can allow moisture ingress, creating favourable conditions for mould development within building fabric. Currently, there is no established guidance on moisture criteria in the construction industry for the assessment of interstitial mould growth. Some studies have considered relative humidity (RH) criteria that account for the duration of exposure but potentially overestimate risk at interfaces. This study implemented more specific RH criteria, based not only on the duration of exposure but also on temperature and substrate material. Results demonstrated a dramatic decrease in predicted mould risk, with minimal risk to health or structural integrity, in comparison to the present more stringent standards. Peer-review under the responsibility of the organizing committee of the ICMB21.","PeriodicalId":113470,"journal":{"name":"Assessing fungal risk criteria via simulated scenarios to address disparity between method and outcomes","volume":"71 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessing fungal risk criteria via simulated scenarios to address disparity between method and outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14293/ICMB210027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Internal wall insulation is one of the most promising methods of improving the energy efficiency of buildings while maintaining their original facades and construction. However, porous materials or poor construction quality can allow moisture ingress, creating favourable conditions for mould development within building fabric. Currently, there is no established guidance on moisture criteria in the construction industry for the assessment of interstitial mould growth. Some studies have considered relative humidity (RH) criteria that account for the duration of exposure but potentially overestimate risk at interfaces. This study implemented more specific RH criteria, based not only on the duration of exposure but also on temperature and substrate material. Results demonstrated a dramatic decrease in predicted mould risk, with minimal risk to health or structural integrity, in comparison to the present more stringent standards. Peer-review under the responsibility of the organizing committee of the ICMB21.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过模拟场景评估真菌风险标准,以解决方法和结果之间的差异
内墙保温是提高建筑物能源效率的最有前途的方法之一,同时保持其原有的外墙和结构。然而,多孔材料或较差的施工质量会允许水分进入,为建筑织物内的霉菌发展创造有利条件。目前,在建筑行业中尚无关于评估间隙霉菌生长的湿度标准的既定指导。一些研究考虑了相对湿度(RH)标准,该标准考虑了暴露的持续时间,但可能高估了界面的风险。这项研究实施了更具体的RH标准,不仅基于暴露的持续时间,还基于温度和衬底材料。结果表明,与目前更严格的标准相比,预测的霉菌风险大幅降低,对健康或结构完整性的风险最小。由ICMB21组委会负责同行评审。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing fungal risk criteria via simulated scenarios to address disparity between method and outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1