{"title":"OPTIMIZATION OF A MODULAR COCKPIT CROSS CAR BEAM FOR CRASHWORTHINESS. IN: AUTOMOTIVE CRASH RESEARCH: SIDE IMPACT, ROLLOVER, AND VEHICLE AGGRESSIVITY","authors":"M. S. Hamid","doi":"10.4271/2002-01-0938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a numerical optimization o a cross car beam of a modular cockpit. The optimization study was performed using LS-OPT code and LS-DTNA solver code. The optimization was based on component load levels that resulted from FMVSS214 dynamic side impacts. The component load conditions were derived from a full vehicle simulation and the beam was subjected to axial load alone and to both axial and bending loads simultaneously. The beam was minimized for lower mass for a selected diameter and a given peak force to occur within 5mm axial deformation and optimal thickness of the beam for minimal effective plastic strain peak for a given resultant deformation.","PeriodicalId":291036,"journal":{"name":"Publication of: Society of Automotive Engineers","volume":"134 44","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Publication of: Society of Automotive Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-0938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
This paper presents a numerical optimization o a cross car beam of a modular cockpit. The optimization study was performed using LS-OPT code and LS-DTNA solver code. The optimization was based on component load levels that resulted from FMVSS214 dynamic side impacts. The component load conditions were derived from a full vehicle simulation and the beam was subjected to axial load alone and to both axial and bending loads simultaneously. The beam was minimized for lower mass for a selected diameter and a given peak force to occur within 5mm axial deformation and optimal thickness of the beam for minimal effective plastic strain peak for a given resultant deformation.