Comparative Evaluation of Flexural and Impact Strength of Denture Base Acrylic Resin using Different Processing Methods - An in-vitro Study

Narmadha D, Yogesh Bhuvaneswar, Ganesh kumar, Arjun Badimela, S. Sakthivel, S. Ajmal, Farhin Fathima
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Flexural and Impact Strength of Denture Base Acrylic Resin using Different Processing Methods - An in-vitro Study","authors":"Narmadha D, Yogesh Bhuvaneswar, Ganesh kumar, Arjun Badimela, S. Sakthivel, S. Ajmal, Farhin Fathima","doi":"10.55995/j-cpi.2023001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: One of the chief limitations of Polymethylmethacrylate denture base material is its inadequate mechanical property. Different processing methods of Polymethylmethacrylate have varying influences on the mechanical properties of denture base material. Aim: The aim of our in-vitro study was to comparatively evaluate the flexural and impact strength values between CAD-CAM, Compression-molded and Injection- molded Polymethylmethacrylate specimens. Materials and methods: A total of 66 acrylic rectangular specimens of ISO Standardization (64 x10 x3.3mm) were fabricated. This study was conducted between three groups: Group I (n=22)-CAD-CAM Milled specimens (Ruthinium, India), Group II (n=22)- Compression-molded specimens (Dental Products of India, Chennai), Group III (n=22)- Injection-molded specimens (SR- Ivocap High Impact, Ivoclar Vivadent). Flexural strength was evaluated using four-point bend test and Impact strength by IZOD Impact tester. Kruskal Wallis unpaired test was used to compare the mean values between groups and Mann Whitney U test was used to carry out pair wise comparison. Results: Flexural strength of CAD-CAM samples were found to be statistically highest followed by injection molded specimens. Conversely, Impact strength of injection- molded specimens were highest followed by CAD-CAM specimens. Flexural as well as impact strength values were found to be least among compression-molded specimens. Conclusion: CAD-CAM specimens exhibited higher flexural strength whereas Injection-molded specimens had the highest impact strength.","PeriodicalId":378561,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PROSTHODONTICS AND IMPLANTOLOGY","volume":"193 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PROSTHODONTICS AND IMPLANTOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55995/j-cpi.2023001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One of the chief limitations of Polymethylmethacrylate denture base material is its inadequate mechanical property. Different processing methods of Polymethylmethacrylate have varying influences on the mechanical properties of denture base material. Aim: The aim of our in-vitro study was to comparatively evaluate the flexural and impact strength values between CAD-CAM, Compression-molded and Injection- molded Polymethylmethacrylate specimens. Materials and methods: A total of 66 acrylic rectangular specimens of ISO Standardization (64 x10 x3.3mm) were fabricated. This study was conducted between three groups: Group I (n=22)-CAD-CAM Milled specimens (Ruthinium, India), Group II (n=22)- Compression-molded specimens (Dental Products of India, Chennai), Group III (n=22)- Injection-molded specimens (SR- Ivocap High Impact, Ivoclar Vivadent). Flexural strength was evaluated using four-point bend test and Impact strength by IZOD Impact tester. Kruskal Wallis unpaired test was used to compare the mean values between groups and Mann Whitney U test was used to carry out pair wise comparison. Results: Flexural strength of CAD-CAM samples were found to be statistically highest followed by injection molded specimens. Conversely, Impact strength of injection- molded specimens were highest followed by CAD-CAM specimens. Flexural as well as impact strength values were found to be least among compression-molded specimens. Conclusion: CAD-CAM specimens exhibited higher flexural strength whereas Injection-molded specimens had the highest impact strength.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同加工方法对义齿基托丙烯酸树脂弯曲和冲击强度的比较研究
背景:聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯义齿基托材料的主要缺陷之一是力学性能不足。聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯的不同加工方法对义齿基托材料的力学性能有不同的影响。目的:对聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯CAD-CAM、压缩成型和注射成型试样的弯曲强度和冲击强度进行比较。材料与方法:制作ISO标准(64 x10 x3.3mm)丙烯酸矩形试件66个。本研究分为三组:第一组(n=22)- cad - cam铣削标本(Ruthinium,印度),第二组(n=22)-压缩成型标本(Dental Products of India, Chennai),第三组(n=22)-注射成型标本(SR- Ivocap High Impact, Ivoclar Vivadent)。弯曲强度采用四点弯曲试验,冲击强度采用IZOD冲击试验机。组间均值比较采用Kruskal Wallis不配对检验,两两比较采用Mann Whitney U检验。结果:CAD-CAM样品的抗弯强度在统计学上最高,其次是注射成型样品。相反,注射成型试样的冲击强度最高,其次是CAD-CAM试样。弯曲和冲击强度值被发现是最小的,在压缩成型的标本。结论:CAD-CAM成型试样具有较高的抗折强度,而注塑成型试样具有最高的抗冲击强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CU-SIL Denture – A Novel Approach: Case Report Mandibular Bar-Retained Tooth-Supported Over Denture: Case Report Occlusal Indicators - A Step Towards Betterment Occlusal clearance indicators- A review of clinical technique Ear Stent Fabrication for Pediatric Patient with an Innovative Method for Retention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1