{"title":"Pyramidal multiresolution image segmentation in SPECT","authors":"Y. Erdi, M. Loew, A. Erdi, B. Wessels","doi":"10.1109/IEMBS.1994.411866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A median filtered pyramidal multiresolution (MFPM) image segmentation method for detecting and delineating compact objects was applied to single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images. These SPECT images were obtained by scanning spheres from 1 to 54 ml in size and from 50% to 100% contrast settings. The algorithm performed accurately for large sphere (20 and 54 ml) and high contrast (90% and 100%) cases. As the size and contrast decrease, the accuracy of the method also decreases. Comparison of the MFPM method with adaptive thresholding with edge-preserving smoothing (ATEPS) indicated superior performance of the MFPM method.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":344622,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 16th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 16th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.1994.411866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A median filtered pyramidal multiresolution (MFPM) image segmentation method for detecting and delineating compact objects was applied to single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images. These SPECT images were obtained by scanning spheres from 1 to 54 ml in size and from 50% to 100% contrast settings. The algorithm performed accurately for large sphere (20 and 54 ml) and high contrast (90% and 100%) cases. As the size and contrast decrease, the accuracy of the method also decreases. Comparison of the MFPM method with adaptive thresholding with edge-preserving smoothing (ATEPS) indicated superior performance of the MFPM method.<>