A Comprehensive Overview of Classical and Modern Route Planning Algorithms for Self-Driving Mobile Robots

N. S. Abu, W. Bukhari, M. Adli, S. Omar, S. A. Sohaimeh
{"title":"A Comprehensive Overview of Classical and Modern Route Planning Algorithms for Self-Driving Mobile Robots","authors":"N. S. Abu, W. Bukhari, M. Adli, S. Omar, S. A. Sohaimeh","doi":"10.18196/jrc.v3i5.14683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mobile robots are increasingly being applied in a variety of sectors, including agricultural, firefighting, and search and rescue operations. Robotics and autonomous technology research and development have played a major role in making this possible. Before a robot can reliably and effectively navigate a space without human aid, there are still several challenges to be addressed. When planning a path to its destination, the robot should be able to gather information from its surroundings and take the appropriate actions to avoid colliding with obstacles along the way. The following review analyses and compares 200 articles from two databases, Scopus and IEEE Xplore, and selects 60 articles as references from those articles. This evaluation focuses mostly on the accuracy of the different path-planning algorithms. Common collision-free path planning methodologies are examined in this paper, including classical or traditional and modern intelligence techniques, as well as both global and local approaches, in static and dynamic environments. Classical or traditional methods, such as Roadmaps (Visibility Graph and Voronoi Diagram), Potential Fields, and Cell Decomposition, and modern methodologies such as heuristic-based (Dijkstra Method, A* Algorithms, and D* Algorithms), metaheuristics algorithms (such as PSO, Bat Algorithm, ACO, and Genetic Algorithm), and neural systems such as fuzzy neural networks or fuzzy logic (FL) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) are described in this report. In this study, we outline the ideas, benefits, and downsides of modeling and path-searching technologies for a mobile robot.","PeriodicalId":443428,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC)","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18196/jrc.v3i5.14683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mobile robots are increasingly being applied in a variety of sectors, including agricultural, firefighting, and search and rescue operations. Robotics and autonomous technology research and development have played a major role in making this possible. Before a robot can reliably and effectively navigate a space without human aid, there are still several challenges to be addressed. When planning a path to its destination, the robot should be able to gather information from its surroundings and take the appropriate actions to avoid colliding with obstacles along the way. The following review analyses and compares 200 articles from two databases, Scopus and IEEE Xplore, and selects 60 articles as references from those articles. This evaluation focuses mostly on the accuracy of the different path-planning algorithms. Common collision-free path planning methodologies are examined in this paper, including classical or traditional and modern intelligence techniques, as well as both global and local approaches, in static and dynamic environments. Classical or traditional methods, such as Roadmaps (Visibility Graph and Voronoi Diagram), Potential Fields, and Cell Decomposition, and modern methodologies such as heuristic-based (Dijkstra Method, A* Algorithms, and D* Algorithms), metaheuristics algorithms (such as PSO, Bat Algorithm, ACO, and Genetic Algorithm), and neural systems such as fuzzy neural networks or fuzzy logic (FL) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) are described in this report. In this study, we outline the ideas, benefits, and downsides of modeling and path-searching technologies for a mobile robot.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自动驾驶移动机器人经典与现代路径规划算法综述
移动机器人越来越多地应用于各种领域,包括农业、消防、搜索和救援行动。机器人技术和自主技术的研发在实现这一目标方面发挥了重要作用。在机器人能够在没有人类帮助的情况下可靠而有效地在空间中导航之前,仍有几个挑战需要解决。在规划到达目的地的路径时,机器人应该能够从周围环境中收集信息,并采取适当的行动,避免与沿途的障碍物相撞。下面的综述分析和比较了来自Scopus和IEEE Xplore两个数据库的200篇文章,并从这些文章中选择了60篇文章作为参考文献。这种评估主要集中在不同路径规划算法的准确性上。本文研究了常见的无碰撞路径规划方法,包括经典或传统和现代智能技术,以及静态和动态环境中的全局和局部方法。经典或传统的方法,如路线图(可视性图和Voronoi图)、势场和细胞分解,现代方法,如启发式(Dijkstra法、A*算法和D*算法)、元启发式算法(如PSO、Bat算法、ACO和遗传算法)和神经系统,如模糊神经网络或模糊逻辑(FL)和人工神经网络(ANN)在本报告中进行了描述。在这项研究中,我们概述了移动机器人建模和路径搜索技术的思想、优点和缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficient Path Planning Algorithm for Mobile Robots Performing Floor Cleaning Like Operations Adaptive Cruise Control of the Autonomous Vehicle Based on Sliding Mode Controller Using Arduino and Ultrasonic Sensor Development of Microclimate Data Recorder on Coffee-Pine Agroforestry Using LoRaWAN and IoT Technology Using Learning Focal Point Algorithm to Classify Emotional Intelligence Enhanced Trajectory Tracking of 3D Overhead Crane Using Adaptive Sliding-Mode Control and Particle Swarm Optimization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1