Machine Learning in Legal Practice: Notes from Recent History

Fernando A. Delgado
{"title":"Machine Learning in Legal Practice: Notes from Recent History","authors":"Fernando A. Delgado","doi":"10.1145/3306618.3314324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Often framed as a relatively new and controversial phenomenon, the application of machine learning (ML) techniques to legal analysis and decision-making in the US justice system has a rich yet under examined history. My research examines how ML came to be adopted as a standard tool for automating fact discovery for high-stakes civil litigation. By analyzing the key controversies and consensuses that emerge during the experimentation and early adoption phase of this technology (2008-2015), a useful case study presents itself in which an expert professional field wrestled with the challenges of integrating ML into sensitive decision-making workflows.","PeriodicalId":418125,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Often framed as a relatively new and controversial phenomenon, the application of machine learning (ML) techniques to legal analysis and decision-making in the US justice system has a rich yet under examined history. My research examines how ML came to be adopted as a standard tool for automating fact discovery for high-stakes civil litigation. By analyzing the key controversies and consensuses that emerge during the experimentation and early adoption phase of this technology (2008-2015), a useful case study presents itself in which an expert professional field wrestled with the challenges of integrating ML into sensitive decision-making workflows.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法律实践中的机器学习:来自近代史的注释
机器学习(ML)技术在美国司法系统的法律分析和决策中的应用,通常被认为是一个相对较新的、有争议的现象,有着丰富但未经研究的历史。我的研究考察了机器学习如何被采用为高风险民事诉讼中自动化事实发现的标准工具。通过分析在该技术的实验和早期采用阶段(2008-2015年)出现的关键争议和共识,一个有用的案例研究展示了一个专家专业领域与将ML集成到敏感决策工作流程中的挑战作斗争的案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Semantics Derived Automatically from Language Corpora Contain Human-like Moral Choices Requirements for an Artificial Agent with Norm Competence Enabling Effective Transparency: Towards User-Centric Intelligent Systems Killer Robots and Human Dignity The Value of Trustworthy AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1