Comparative Analysis of Morphological and Farmers' Cognitive Diversity in Yam Landraces (Dioscorea spp.) from Southern Ethiopia

Muluneh Tamiru, H. Becker, B. Maass
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Morphological and Farmers' Cognitive Diversity in Yam Landraces (Dioscorea spp.) from Southern Ethiopia","authors":"Muluneh Tamiru, H. Becker, B. Maass","doi":"10.11248/JSTA.55.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neglected by research and development, knowledge of the genetic diversity in Ethiopian yams is found mainly with the local farmers. The local yam classification system in Southern Ethiopia was studied through individual and key informant interviews. Data collected include attributes/traits of each landrace used in the folk taxonomy. Local farmers recognize two major categories of yams: 'hatuma boye' ('male' yam) and 'macha boye' ('female' yam). This categorization has no reference to the reproductive biology of the plant. \"Female\" yams mature early and produce tubers of excellent quality, but are less vigorous in growth compared to 'male' yams and yield poorly under sub-optimal conditions. Whereas, 'male' yams mature late, grow vigorously and are tolerant to drought. Individual landraces are further identified based on variations in maturity time, morphological and/or growth attributes. Eighty-two yam accessions collected from Gedeo, Sidama, Wolayita and Gamo-Gofa zones were characterized using 42 qualitative morphological variables. Cluster and principal component analyses gave seven distinct groups, revealing that the overall structure of morphological diversity is consistent with farmers' classification. Nevertheless, no clear morphological variations were observed between some differently named landraces. Few landraces known by the same vernacular name were also morphologically distinct. This study demonstrated the existence of a well-defined local classification system and a wide variability among the accessions studied. It also revealed the need for detailed phylogenetic studies to determine the species identity of the accessions studied and broaden the knowledge base of Ethiopian yams.","PeriodicalId":118800,"journal":{"name":"Tropical agriculture and development","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical agriculture and development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11248/JSTA.55.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Neglected by research and development, knowledge of the genetic diversity in Ethiopian yams is found mainly with the local farmers. The local yam classification system in Southern Ethiopia was studied through individual and key informant interviews. Data collected include attributes/traits of each landrace used in the folk taxonomy. Local farmers recognize two major categories of yams: 'hatuma boye' ('male' yam) and 'macha boye' ('female' yam). This categorization has no reference to the reproductive biology of the plant. "Female" yams mature early and produce tubers of excellent quality, but are less vigorous in growth compared to 'male' yams and yield poorly under sub-optimal conditions. Whereas, 'male' yams mature late, grow vigorously and are tolerant to drought. Individual landraces are further identified based on variations in maturity time, morphological and/or growth attributes. Eighty-two yam accessions collected from Gedeo, Sidama, Wolayita and Gamo-Gofa zones were characterized using 42 qualitative morphological variables. Cluster and principal component analyses gave seven distinct groups, revealing that the overall structure of morphological diversity is consistent with farmers' classification. Nevertheless, no clear morphological variations were observed between some differently named landraces. Few landraces known by the same vernacular name were also morphologically distinct. This study demonstrated the existence of a well-defined local classification system and a wide variability among the accessions studied. It also revealed the need for detailed phylogenetic studies to determine the species identity of the accessions studied and broaden the knowledge base of Ethiopian yams.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚南部山药地方品种形态与农民认知多样性的比较分析
由于研究和开发的忽视,埃塞俄比亚山药遗传多样性的知识主要是在当地农民那里发现的。通过个人访谈和关键信息提供者访谈,研究了埃塞俄比亚南部当地山药分类系统。收集的数据包括民间分类中使用的每种地方品种的属性/特征。当地农民认识到两大类山药:“hatuma boye”(“雄性”山药)和“macha boye”(“雌性”山药)。这种分类与植物的生殖生物学无关。“雌性”山药成熟早,块茎质量好,但与“雄性”山药相比,生长活力较弱,在次优条件下产量较低。而“雄性”山药成熟较晚,生长旺盛,耐干旱。根据成熟时间、形态和/或生长属性的变化,进一步确定个别地方品种。采用42个定性形态学变量对来自Gedeo、Sidama、Wolayita和Gamo-Gofa地区的82份山药进行了性状分析。聚类分析和主成分分析结果表明,植物形态多样性总体结构与农民分类一致。然而,在一些不同命名的地方种之间没有观察到明显的形态差异。很少有以相同的方言命名的地方种族在形态上也不同。本研究证明了存在一个定义良好的局部分类系统,并且在所研究的材料之间存在广泛的变异。它还表明需要进行详细的系统发育研究,以确定所研究的材料的物种特征,并扩大埃塞俄比亚山药的知识库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nutrient Status of Frond Heaps and the Underlying Soils at An 18-Year-Old Oil Palm Field in Central Pahang, Malaysia Changes in Nutrient Contents in Pith of Sago Palm (Metroxylon sagu Rottb.) Suckers during Storage and Effects of Storage Conditions on Subsequent Growth during Nursery Period Effect of root and leaf trimming in sago palm (Metroxylon sagu Rottb.) suckers prior to planting on the survival rate in nursery Comparison of Early Growth of Sago Palm (Metroxylon sagu Rottb.) Seedlings in a Culture Solution with Individual Exclusion of Macro- and Micronutrients Effects of Day-length Treatment and Harvesting Time on the Flowering of Erianthus arundinaceus on Ishigaki Island, Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1