Book Review: Aidan Nichols, Balthasar for Thomists

E. Martínez
{"title":"Book Review: Aidan Nichols, Balthasar for Thomists","authors":"E. Martínez","doi":"10.1177/10638512211016245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students of theology are sometimes encouraged to choose between great theologians in an “either/or” fashion. This is contrary to the theological method both of Saint Thomas Aquinas and Hans Urs von Balthasar. Balthasar writes in My Work: In Retrospect that his mission in the Church is to be in constant dialogue with multiple notable thinkers from all the stages of the long history of the Church. He avoids theological polarizations. These are often “arbitrary rigid lines” in the greater scheme of the constellation of the communion of saints. Bearing this in mind, the reader of Balthasar cannot interpret it as a condemnation when Balthasar does not grant Aquinas the exclusivity that Catholic theology tends to give him. Even though Balthasar considers High Scholasticism a rationalization of theology, he accepts it as a necessary phase in the development of doctrine. For example, when comparing Dante to Aquinas, Balthasar says of the latter that he was more of a philosopher than a theologian. This cannot overshadow Balthasar’s praise of Aquinas for his clear and intelligible ordering of the created world in relation to God. Balthasar considers the doctrine of the real distinction to be the culmination of all Christian philosophy. As Nichols shows in this book, Balthasar is incomprehensible without the Angelic Doctor. Similarly, the reader of Aquinas should remain open to other theological voices. Nichols encourages all of us to “test everything” and “hold fast what is good” (1 Thess. 5:21). The term “Thomist” has carried many different meanings. Perhaps those scholars who define the term as a style of thinking in light of a sacred tradition are the closest to achieving the compatibility and complementarity of two great thinkers. To perform this synthesis, Nichols divides the book into two large sections. The first is a combination of three chapters that correspond to the three volumes of Balthasar’s Trilogy. The second deals with several topics in dogmatic and pastoral theology. The seven chapters are preceded by an introduction and 1016245 PRE0010.1177/10638512211016245Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical TheologyBook Review book-review2021","PeriodicalId":223812,"journal":{"name":"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10638512211016245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Students of theology are sometimes encouraged to choose between great theologians in an “either/or” fashion. This is contrary to the theological method both of Saint Thomas Aquinas and Hans Urs von Balthasar. Balthasar writes in My Work: In Retrospect that his mission in the Church is to be in constant dialogue with multiple notable thinkers from all the stages of the long history of the Church. He avoids theological polarizations. These are often “arbitrary rigid lines” in the greater scheme of the constellation of the communion of saints. Bearing this in mind, the reader of Balthasar cannot interpret it as a condemnation when Balthasar does not grant Aquinas the exclusivity that Catholic theology tends to give him. Even though Balthasar considers High Scholasticism a rationalization of theology, he accepts it as a necessary phase in the development of doctrine. For example, when comparing Dante to Aquinas, Balthasar says of the latter that he was more of a philosopher than a theologian. This cannot overshadow Balthasar’s praise of Aquinas for his clear and intelligible ordering of the created world in relation to God. Balthasar considers the doctrine of the real distinction to be the culmination of all Christian philosophy. As Nichols shows in this book, Balthasar is incomprehensible without the Angelic Doctor. Similarly, the reader of Aquinas should remain open to other theological voices. Nichols encourages all of us to “test everything” and “hold fast what is good” (1 Thess. 5:21). The term “Thomist” has carried many different meanings. Perhaps those scholars who define the term as a style of thinking in light of a sacred tradition are the closest to achieving the compatibility and complementarity of two great thinkers. To perform this synthesis, Nichols divides the book into two large sections. The first is a combination of three chapters that correspond to the three volumes of Balthasar’s Trilogy. The second deals with several topics in dogmatic and pastoral theology. The seven chapters are preceded by an introduction and 1016245 PRE0010.1177/10638512211016245Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical TheologyBook Review book-review2021
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:艾丹·尼科尔斯,托马斯主义者的巴尔萨萨
神学学生有时被鼓励以“非此即彼”的方式在伟大的神学家之间做出选择。这与圣托马斯·阿奎那和汉斯·乌尔斯·冯·巴尔塔萨的神学方法是相反的。巴尔萨萨在《我的工作:回顾》中写道,他在教会的使命是与教会悠久历史各个阶段的著名思想家进行不断的对话。他避免了神学上的两极分化。这些往往是“武断的刚性线”在更大的方案星座的圣餐。记住这一点,巴尔塔萨的读者不能把它解释为谴责当巴尔塔萨没有给予阿奎那天主教神学倾向于给予他的排他性。尽管巴尔塔萨认为高等经院哲学是神学的理性化,但他认为这是教义发展的必要阶段。例如,当将但丁与阿奎那作比较时,巴尔塔萨说后者与其说是神学家,不如说是哲学家。这不能掩盖巴尔萨萨对阿奎那的赞美,因为他对创造世界与上帝的关系进行了清晰而可理解的排序。巴尔萨萨认为真正的区别学说是所有基督教哲学的顶峰。正如尼科尔斯在这本书中所展示的那样,没有天使医生,巴尔萨萨是无法理解的。同样,阿奎那的读者应该对其他神学的声音保持开放的态度。尼科尔斯鼓励我们所有人“凡事察验”,“善美的要持守”(帖前5:21)。“托马斯主义者”一词有许多不同的含义。也许那些将这个术语定义为一种神圣传统思维方式的学者最接近于实现两位伟大思想家的兼容性和互补性。为了进行这种综合,尼科尔斯将本书分为两大部分。第一个是三个章节的组合,对应于巴尔萨萨三部曲的三卷。第二部分涉及教义神学和教牧神学的几个主题。七章之前是介绍和1016245 PRE0010.1177/10638512211016245Pro教会:天主教和福音派神学杂志书评书评2021
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Catholicity and the Catholic Church: Protestant Concerns and (Roman) Catholic Perspectives Supremely Simple Trinity and Contemporary “Natural Theology”: Bonaventure Beyond Jenson and Plotinus Editor’s Note The Grammar of Salvation: The Function of Trinitarian Theology in the Works of Karen Kilby and Robert Jenson Reasons to Say Farewell
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1