ЩОДО ПРОБЛЕМИ ПРАВОВОГО РЕГУЛЮВАННЯ ВІДСТОРОНЕННЯ ПРАЦІВНИКА ВІД РОБОТИ

М. Д. Ждан
{"title":"ЩОДО ПРОБЛЕМИ ПРАВОВОГО РЕГУЛЮВАННЯ ВІДСТОРОНЕННЯ ПРАЦІВНИКА ВІД РОБОТИ","authors":"М. Д. Ждан","doi":"10.34142/23121661.2019.30.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the scientific article is to determine the purpose of dismissal of the employee and the reasons for such removal. It is proved that today neither current legislation, nor jurisprudence, nor science contain a single well-considered vision of the place of exclusion in the labor law system. It is noted that termination of work is always an intermediate stage, which will end either with the renewal of the employment contract and return to previous work, or with the change of the employment contract, or, even, its termination. It is substantiated that, upon dismissal from work, the main purpose is to protect the interests of the owner and employees, as well as to prevent possible violations of the rules of labor and labor discipline. Based on the analysis of the current legislation, it has been found that there are a lot of entities that have the right to initiate dismissal. By organizing data on the legal capacity of subjects to initiate dismissal, they are divided into three groups: a) entities that make the decision to dismiss and implement it; b) those requiring mandatory dismissal; c) those who raise the issue of dismissal. It is proposed to supplement the current legislation with a new reason for dismissal of an employee.","PeriodicalId":189398,"journal":{"name":"Збірник наукових праць ХНПУ імені Г. С. Сковороди \"Право\"","volume":"518 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Збірник наукових праць ХНПУ імені Г. С. Сковороди \"Право\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34142/23121661.2019.30.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of the scientific article is to determine the purpose of dismissal of the employee and the reasons for such removal. It is proved that today neither current legislation, nor jurisprudence, nor science contain a single well-considered vision of the place of exclusion in the labor law system. It is noted that termination of work is always an intermediate stage, which will end either with the renewal of the employment contract and return to previous work, or with the change of the employment contract, or, even, its termination. It is substantiated that, upon dismissal from work, the main purpose is to protect the interests of the owner and employees, as well as to prevent possible violations of the rules of labor and labor discipline. Based on the analysis of the current legislation, it has been found that there are a lot of entities that have the right to initiate dismissal. By organizing data on the legal capacity of subjects to initiate dismissal, they are divided into three groups: a) entities that make the decision to dismiss and implement it; b) those requiring mandatory dismissal; c) those who raise the issue of dismissal. It is proposed to supplement the current legislation with a new reason for dismissal of an employee.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学文章的目的是确定解雇员工的目的和这种解雇的原因。事实证明,无论是现行的立法,还是法学,还是科学,都没有对劳动法律体系中的排他性地位提出一个经过深思熟虑的观点。值得注意的是,终止工作始终是一个中间阶段,这个阶段要么以续签劳动合同并返回以前的工作为结束,要么以改变劳动合同,甚至终止劳动合同为结束。事实证明,解雇的主要目的是保护业主和员工的利益,并防止可能违反劳动规则和劳动纪律。通过对我国现行立法的分析,可以发现我国存在着许多具有辞退权的主体。通过组织有关主体发起解雇的法律行为能力的数据,将其分为三组:a)作出解雇决定并执行该决定的实体;B)要求强制解雇的;C)提出解雇问题的人。有人建议在现行立法中增加一个解雇雇员的新理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ПРИНЦИП ВЕРХОВЕНСТВА ПРАВА: ІСТОРІЯ СТАНОВЛЕННЯ ІННОВАЦІЙНЕ ІНВЕСТУВАННЯ В ПРОЦЕСАХ РОЗВИТКУ МІЖНАРОДНИХ ЕКОНОМІЧНИХ ВІДНОСИН ПРАВОВА ТА ТЕХНІЧНА ПРИРОДА ЕЛЕКТРОННИХ ДОКАЗІВ У ГОСПОДАРСЬКОМУ СУДОЧИНСТВІ ВИМОГИ ДО МОРАЛЬНИХ ЯКОСТЕЙ ПРАЦІВНИКІВ, ЯКІ ВИКОНУЮТЬ ВИХОВНІ ФУНКЦІЇ: ІСТОРИЧНИЙ АСПЕКТ УСТАНОВЛЕННЯ ОБОВ’ЯЗКУ ВЧИНИТИ ПЕВНІ ДІЇ ̶ ЯК ОДИН ІЗ ЗАХОДІВ ЗАБЕЗПЕЧЕННЯ ПОЗОВУ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1