The Analysis of Indonesian EFL Argumentative Writing Using Toulmin’s Model: The Structure and Struggles from the Learners

Hanna Sundari, Rina Husnaini Febriyanti
{"title":"The Analysis of Indonesian EFL Argumentative Writing Using Toulmin’s Model: The Structure and Struggles from the Learners","authors":"Hanna Sundari, Rina Husnaini Febriyanti","doi":"10.30998/SCOPE.V5I2.8544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Argumentative writing plays an important role in academic writing at university level. However, learners mostly find that writing this essay a challenging and effortful task. This present study aims at exploring the structures of argumentative essay written by Indonesian EFL students from one university in Jakarta Indonesia. Moreover, it investigates their difficulty and constraints during composing the essay. Using a descriptive qualitative design, the authors selected writing assignment and questionnaire for collecting data. A layout of Toulmin model of arguments was used in analyzing the essays. The findings of the study show that the argumentative papers cover the main elements: claim (thesis statement), data, rebut, and rebuttal data using either in block pattern or point-by-point pattern. The elements show diverse in types. Logical analysis and explanation are the most frequently used on the papers. Though they present acceptable thesis with well-organized essay, some information is unrelated and data for supporting the claim are seemingly insufficient. In addition, the students think that this essay as difficult task. In general, lack of knowledge, vocabulary and practice cause the constraints. In specific level, the students report that giving argument, finding support and working on counterargument become source of difficulty and constraints.","PeriodicalId":149821,"journal":{"name":"Journal on English Language Teaching","volume":"7 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30998/SCOPE.V5I2.8544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Argumentative writing plays an important role in academic writing at university level. However, learners mostly find that writing this essay a challenging and effortful task. This present study aims at exploring the structures of argumentative essay written by Indonesian EFL students from one university in Jakarta Indonesia. Moreover, it investigates their difficulty and constraints during composing the essay. Using a descriptive qualitative design, the authors selected writing assignment and questionnaire for collecting data. A layout of Toulmin model of arguments was used in analyzing the essays. The findings of the study show that the argumentative papers cover the main elements: claim (thesis statement), data, rebut, and rebuttal data using either in block pattern or point-by-point pattern. The elements show diverse in types. Logical analysis and explanation are the most frequently used on the papers. Though they present acceptable thesis with well-organized essay, some information is unrelated and data for supporting the claim are seemingly insufficient. In addition, the students think that this essay as difficult task. In general, lack of knowledge, vocabulary and practice cause the constraints. In specific level, the students report that giving argument, finding support and working on counterargument become source of difficulty and constraints.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用图尔敏模型分析印尼语英语议论文写作:学习者的结构与挣扎
议论文写作在大学学术写作中占有重要地位。然而,大多数学习者发现写这篇文章是一项具有挑战性和费力的任务。本研究旨在探讨来自印尼雅加达一所大学的印尼英语学生议论文的结构。此外,还调查了他们在写作过程中的困难和限制。采用描述性定性设计,作者选择写作作业和问卷调查收集数据。文章分析采用了图尔敏论证模型的布局。研究结果表明,议论文涵盖了主要元素:主张(论文陈述),数据,反驳和反驳数据,使用块模式或逐点模式。元素表现出不同的类型。逻辑分析和解释是考卷中最常用的。虽然他们提出了可以接受的论文和组织良好的文章,但一些信息是不相关的,支持该主张的数据似乎不足。此外,学生们认为这篇文章很难。一般来说,缺乏知识、词汇和实践造成了制约。在特定的层面上,学生们报告说,提出论点,寻求支持和反论点的工作成为困难和限制的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY TO THE ACQUISITION OF ENGLISH WORD TIERS BY INDONESIAN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS Politeness principle of assertive act in debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden THE INCORPORATION OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY TOOLS IN THE PRE-SERVICE LEARNING ACTIVITIES IN A TEACHER’S LESSON PLAN INDONESIAN UNIVERSITY STUDENT'S EMOTIONAL EXPERIENCES OF LEARNING VOCABULARY THROUGH ENGLISH LEARNING ACCOUNTS ON INSTAGRAM THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ONLINE INSTRUCTIONAL VIDEOS IN TEACHING STUDENT SPEAKING SKILL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1