{"title":"Risk Literacy: What Can Adult Literacy Education Learn from the Decision Sciences?","authors":"L. Saal","doi":"10.35847/LSAAL.3.2.62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Choices, like which health/car insurance plan best meets both needs and budget, whether to evacuate for a hurricane or shelter in place, whether to participate in a protest during a global pandemic, or even which politician serves their communities’ interests in an upcoming election, all require adults to determine the risks and/ or rewards associated with alternative outcomes of these multifaceted, socially, and culturally embedded real-world problems (Gresch et al., 2013; Saal, 2015; Saal et al., 2020). Adults bring prior experiences, knowledge, and existing skills of inductive reasoning and evaluation to “not only effectively tackle these situations at an individual level but also to take part in public debates and make fair judgments on how the authorities deal with these issues at a local or global level” (Fang et al., 2019, p. 427).","PeriodicalId":306023,"journal":{"name":"Adult Literacy Education: The International Journal of Literacy, Language, and Numeracy","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adult Literacy Education: The International Journal of Literacy, Language, and Numeracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35847/LSAAL.3.2.62","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Choices, like which health/car insurance plan best meets both needs and budget, whether to evacuate for a hurricane or shelter in place, whether to participate in a protest during a global pandemic, or even which politician serves their communities’ interests in an upcoming election, all require adults to determine the risks and/ or rewards associated with alternative outcomes of these multifaceted, socially, and culturally embedded real-world problems (Gresch et al., 2013; Saal, 2015; Saal et al., 2020). Adults bring prior experiences, knowledge, and existing skills of inductive reasoning and evaluation to “not only effectively tackle these situations at an individual level but also to take part in public debates and make fair judgments on how the authorities deal with these issues at a local or global level” (Fang et al., 2019, p. 427).
选择,如哪种健康/汽车保险计划最能满足需求和预算,是否在飓风或避难所撤离,是否在全球大流行期间参加抗议活动,甚至哪个政治家在即将到来的选举中服务于他们的社区利益,都要求成年人确定与这些多方面的,社会和文化嵌入的现实世界问题的替代结果相关的风险和/或回报(Gresch et al., 2013;萨尔,2015;Saal et al., 2020)。成年人带来了先前的经验、知识和归纳推理和评估的现有技能,“不仅在个人层面有效地解决这些情况,而且还参与公共辩论,并对当局如何在地方或全球层面处理这些问题做出公正的判断”(Fang等人,2019年,第427页)。