The State and Ethnic Minorities: The Case of Georgia

Mikheil Shavtvaladze
{"title":"The State and Ethnic Minorities: The Case of Georgia","authors":"Mikheil Shavtvaladze","doi":"10.1353/REG.2018.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article analyzes interethnic relations in post-Soviet Georgia seen from the perspective of political stability and peaceful democratic consolidation. Approaching the question through theories of conflict management in divided societies, the paper traces the degree of state accommodation of minorities under Gamsakhurdia, Shevardnadze, Saakashvili and Georgian Dream. This article argues that the ethnonationalistic, centralizing, majoritarian, and arbitrary approaches employed in various degrees and intensities by the state contributed to the escalation of ethnoterritorial conflicts, political instability, and insufficient accommodation of minorities in post-Soviet Georgia.","PeriodicalId":307724,"journal":{"name":"Region: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Region: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/REG.2018.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract:This article analyzes interethnic relations in post-Soviet Georgia seen from the perspective of political stability and peaceful democratic consolidation. Approaching the question through theories of conflict management in divided societies, the paper traces the degree of state accommodation of minorities under Gamsakhurdia, Shevardnadze, Saakashvili and Georgian Dream. This article argues that the ethnonationalistic, centralizing, majoritarian, and arbitrary approaches employed in various degrees and intensities by the state contributed to the escalation of ethnoterritorial conflicts, political instability, and insufficient accommodation of minorities in post-Soviet Georgia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家和少数民族:格鲁吉亚的案例
摘要:本文从政治稳定与和平巩固民主的角度分析后苏联时期格鲁吉亚的民族关系。通过分裂社会中的冲突管理理论来解决这个问题,本文追溯了在加姆萨胡尔迪亚、谢瓦尔德纳泽、萨卡什维利和格鲁吉亚之梦时期,国家对少数民族的包容程度。本文认为,在苏联解体后的格鲁吉亚,国家在不同程度和强度上采用的民族主义、中央集权、多数主义和武断的方法导致了民族领土冲突的升级、政治不稳定以及对少数民族的不充分包容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Uzbek Migrants in Türkiye: Gender, Satisfaction in Türkiye, and Return Intentions On Arid Ground: Political Ecologies of Empire in Russian Central Asia by Jennifer Keating (review) Analyzing the Compatibility of the Remedial Right of Secession with Regard to the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Arrested Development: The Soviet Union in Ghana, Guinea, and Mali, 1955–1968 by Alessandro Iandolo (review) "Save the Children!": The Symbol of Childhood and (De)Legitimation of Power in Russian Protests, 2017–21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1