Police shootings: how statistics can be dangerously misleading when excluding context factors

S. Johnson
{"title":"Police shootings: how statistics can be dangerously misleading when excluding context factors","authors":"S. Johnson","doi":"10.15406/frcij.2018.06.00237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"gun in the line of duty is quite rare.1‒4 Miller3 estimates that police use of force against citizens occurs in less than 1.5% of police contacts and that deadly force is used in approximately 360 cases per year compared to 60,000 reported cases of assault against police officers each year.5 Estimates of the use of force in general by police range from 0.1% to 31.8%.6 The problem here is that force is loosely defined by researchers and the public and varies depending on the article read. In addition, the percentage of police shootings compared to all police contacts is a rare but emotionally powerful event. As one example, in an interview with the Washington Post, First Assistant Chief Michel Moore of the LAPD commented that their officers are involved in approximately 1.5 million volatile encounters per year, yet their department had only 15 police shootings resulting in suspect fatalities in 2017.7 Police use of force and use of deadly force is a rare event given the vast numbers of police interactions per year. In approximately 90% of cases of police shooting fatalities the suspect had a weapon.8 When people hear of a shooting, it is easy to fear that police shootings are a common occurrence and that the police shootings are occurring all of the time when in fact if people slow down and examine the overall statistics, they would realize that police shootings are uncommon in the daily activity of law enforcement.9 Despite those handful of cases, less than approximately 1-3% of police shootings are deemed unjustified when all the facts and the full context of the circumstance (context) was examined. Politics also slant the issue by highlighting a police shooting that was justified but portraying the officer’s actions as being unjustified, and this is based on a few facts or opinions prior to any full investigation. Approximately 1% of police shootings appear unjustified. The problem with the statistics of course is how the data is gathered and the definitions used about appropriate degrees of force. I understand that even one unjustified use of lethal force by police is unacceptable, yet given the overall number of police shootings, the percent of unjustified shootings is extremely low. As an example, Minneapolis Police officers recently (2018) shot and killed a Black male and the community threatened to and then rioted because they wanted the police officers arrested and charged with murder. This, despite the facts that: I. The officers were responding to a call of a man brandishing and at least twice firing a gun;","PeriodicalId":284029,"journal":{"name":"Foresic Research & Criminology International Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foresic Research & Criminology International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/frcij.2018.06.00237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

gun in the line of duty is quite rare.1‒4 Miller3 estimates that police use of force against citizens occurs in less than 1.5% of police contacts and that deadly force is used in approximately 360 cases per year compared to 60,000 reported cases of assault against police officers each year.5 Estimates of the use of force in general by police range from 0.1% to 31.8%.6 The problem here is that force is loosely defined by researchers and the public and varies depending on the article read. In addition, the percentage of police shootings compared to all police contacts is a rare but emotionally powerful event. As one example, in an interview with the Washington Post, First Assistant Chief Michel Moore of the LAPD commented that their officers are involved in approximately 1.5 million volatile encounters per year, yet their department had only 15 police shootings resulting in suspect fatalities in 2017.7 Police use of force and use of deadly force is a rare event given the vast numbers of police interactions per year. In approximately 90% of cases of police shooting fatalities the suspect had a weapon.8 When people hear of a shooting, it is easy to fear that police shootings are a common occurrence and that the police shootings are occurring all of the time when in fact if people slow down and examine the overall statistics, they would realize that police shootings are uncommon in the daily activity of law enforcement.9 Despite those handful of cases, less than approximately 1-3% of police shootings are deemed unjustified when all the facts and the full context of the circumstance (context) was examined. Politics also slant the issue by highlighting a police shooting that was justified but portraying the officer’s actions as being unjustified, and this is based on a few facts or opinions prior to any full investigation. Approximately 1% of police shootings appear unjustified. The problem with the statistics of course is how the data is gathered and the definitions used about appropriate degrees of force. I understand that even one unjustified use of lethal force by police is unacceptable, yet given the overall number of police shootings, the percent of unjustified shootings is extremely low. As an example, Minneapolis Police officers recently (2018) shot and killed a Black male and the community threatened to and then rioted because they wanted the police officers arrested and charged with murder. This, despite the facts that: I. The officers were responding to a call of a man brandishing and at least twice firing a gun;
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
警察枪击:统计数据如何在排除背景因素时具有危险的误导性
执勤时带枪是很少见的。1-4米勒3估计,警察对公民使用武力的情况不到警察接触的1.5%,每年使用致命武力的案件约为360起,而每年报告的袭击警察的案件为6万起警方使用武力的比例一般在0.1%至31.8%之间这里的问题是,研究人员和公众对力的定义很松散,而且根据所读文章的不同而有所不同。此外,与所有警察接触相比,警察枪击事件的百分比是一个罕见的,但情感上很强大的事件。例如,洛杉矶警察局第一助理局长米歇尔·摩尔在接受《华盛顿邮报》采访时评论说,他们的警察每年参与大约150万次不稳定的冲突,但他们部门在2017年只有15起警察枪击事件导致嫌疑人死亡。鉴于每年大量的警察互动,警察使用武力和使用致命武力是罕见的事件。在大约90%的警察开枪致死的案件中,嫌疑人有武器当人们听到枪击事件时,很容易担心警察枪击事件是经常发生的,警察枪击事件一直在发生,但事实上,如果人们放慢脚步,检查一下整体的统计数据,他们就会意识到警察枪击事件在日常执法活动中并不常见尽管有这些少数案例,但在审查了所有事实和整个情况(上下文)后,只有不到1% -3%的警察枪击被认为是不正当的。政治也使这个问题倾斜,强调警察开枪是正当的,但把警察的行为描绘成不正当的,这是基于任何全面调查之前的一些事实或观点。大约1%的警察开枪是不正当的。当然,统计数据的问题在于如何收集数据以及如何定义适当的力的程度。我明白,即使是一次警察不正当使用致命武力都是不可接受的,但考虑到警察开枪的总数,不正当开枪的比例是极低的。例如,明尼阿波利斯市警察最近(2018年)枪杀了一名黑人男性,社区威胁要逮捕警察并以谋杀罪起诉他们,然后发生了骚乱。尽管有以下事实:1 .警察当时是在响应一名男子挥舞并至少开了两次枪的呼叫;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Examining the liability issues associated with prone restraint deaths in detention Transformation of labour rights: a solution to protecting prisoners in China? Forensic evidence – a rape and murder case Overview on crime scene procedures involving animals The right of peoples to self-determination and territorial integrity of states in the estimates and conclusions of the Venice commission
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1