Are single-item needs' and values' measures a good alternative to multi-item measures for sport marketers?

Galen T. Trail, Don Lee, Stavros Triantafyllidis, Jessica Minkove, Ari Kim, Kristi Sweeney, Wan-yong Choi, Priscila Alfaro-Barrantes
{"title":"Are single-item needs' and values' measures a good alternative to multi-item measures for sport marketers?","authors":"Galen T. Trail, Don Lee, Stavros Triantafyllidis, Jessica Minkove, Ari Kim, Kristi Sweeney, Wan-yong Choi, Priscila Alfaro-Barrantes","doi":"10.1108/ijsms-11-2021-0225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper aims to determine if single-item (SI) needs' and values' measures have similar reliability and validity values to multi-item (MI) measures of the same constructs and thus could be substituted by sport marketers to predict internal motivating aspects of sport consumer attitudes and behavior. In addition, the authors wish to determine whether a small subset of needs and values listed in current measures are sufficient to predict sport consumer attitudes and behavior.Design/methodology/approachIn this two-study design, the first study was a national sample (N = 439) comparing reliability and validity of single-item scales to multi-item scales. In the second study the authors collected data from fans and spectators of four different teams (N1 = 583; N2 = 1164; N3 = 213; N4 = 404) to determine the impact of needs and values on sport consumer attitudes and behavior.FindingsThe authors determined that in 89% of the scales, single-item measures of needs and values were just as reliable and valid as their associated multi-item measures. The authors also found that a small subset of the needs and values explain a meaningful amount of variance in sport consumer attitudes and behaviors.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors determined that in 89% of the scales, single-item measures of needs and values were just as reliable and valid as their associated multi-item measures. The authors also found that a small subset of the needs and values explain a meaningful amount of variance in sport consumer attitudes and behaviors.Originality/valueThe authors show that as motives for sport consumption, single-item measures of personal needs and values are equivalent to multi-item measures and not all needs and values used in previous sport research are necessary because they do not predict a meaningful amount of variance in sport consumer attitudes and behaviors. The authors identified a small number of single-item measures that practitioners can easily use in short surveys that will predict a statistically meaningful amount of variance in sport consumer attitudes and behaviors.","PeriodicalId":289192,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship","volume":"386 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijsms-11-2021-0225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to determine if single-item (SI) needs' and values' measures have similar reliability and validity values to multi-item (MI) measures of the same constructs and thus could be substituted by sport marketers to predict internal motivating aspects of sport consumer attitudes and behavior. In addition, the authors wish to determine whether a small subset of needs and values listed in current measures are sufficient to predict sport consumer attitudes and behavior.Design/methodology/approachIn this two-study design, the first study was a national sample (N = 439) comparing reliability and validity of single-item scales to multi-item scales. In the second study the authors collected data from fans and spectators of four different teams (N1 = 583; N2 = 1164; N3 = 213; N4 = 404) to determine the impact of needs and values on sport consumer attitudes and behavior.FindingsThe authors determined that in 89% of the scales, single-item measures of needs and values were just as reliable and valid as their associated multi-item measures. The authors also found that a small subset of the needs and values explain a meaningful amount of variance in sport consumer attitudes and behaviors.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors determined that in 89% of the scales, single-item measures of needs and values were just as reliable and valid as their associated multi-item measures. The authors also found that a small subset of the needs and values explain a meaningful amount of variance in sport consumer attitudes and behaviors.Originality/valueThe authors show that as motives for sport consumption, single-item measures of personal needs and values are equivalent to multi-item measures and not all needs and values used in previous sport research are necessary because they do not predict a meaningful amount of variance in sport consumer attitudes and behaviors. The authors identified a small number of single-item measures that practitioners can easily use in short surveys that will predict a statistically meaningful amount of variance in sport consumer attitudes and behaviors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对于体育营销人员来说,单项目的需求和价值衡量是多项目衡量的一个好选择吗?
目的:本文旨在确定单项目(SI)需求和价值测量是否与相同结构的多项目(MI)测量具有相似的信度和效度值,从而可以被体育营销人员替代,以预测体育消费者态度和行为的内部激励方面。此外,作者希望确定当前测量中列出的一小部分需求和价值观是否足以预测体育消费者的态度和行为。设计/方法/方法在这个两项研究的设计中,第一项研究是一个国家样本(N = 439),比较单项目量表和多项目量表的信度和效度。在第二项研究中,作者收集了四支不同球队的球迷和观众的数据(N1 = 583;n2 = 1164;n3 = 213;N4 = 404)来确定需求和价值观对体育消费者态度和行为的影响。研究结果作者确定,在89%的量表中,对需求和价值的单项测量与相关的多项测量一样可靠和有效。作者还发现,需求和价值观的一小部分解释了体育消费者态度和行为的大量差异。研究的局限性/意义作者确定,在89%的量表中,对需求和价值的单项测量与相关的多项测量一样可靠和有效。作者还发现,需求和价值观的一小部分解释了体育消费者态度和行为的大量差异。原创性/价值作者表明,作为体育消费的动机,个人需求和价值观的单项测量等同于多项测量,并不是以前的体育研究中使用的所有需求和价值观都是必要的,因为它们不能预测体育消费者态度和行为的有意义的差异。作者确定了少量的单项测量,从业者可以很容易地在简短的调查中使用,这些调查将预测体育消费者态度和行为的统计上有意义的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Let's run green! Impact of runners' environmental consciousness on their green perceived quality and supportive intention at participatory sport events Customer engagement on social media: an examination of NFL teams’ Instagram posts The impacts of social needs and game playing type on esports consumers' positive eWOM sharing: applying the FIRO theory Stakeholders' “voice” through social media: the case of corporate social responsibility in sport Co-branding drivers between professional sport organizations and on-field sports apparel sponsors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1