Private-in-the-Collective: Comparing the History and Legacy of Sovkhoism in Poland and Germany

J. O. Habeck
{"title":"Private-in-the-Collective: Comparing the History and Legacy of Sovkhoism in Poland and Germany","authors":"J. O. Habeck","doi":"10.1353/reg.2020.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This contribution seeks to compare the different preconditions and historical dynamics of socialist agriculture in two adjacent regions (northwest Poland and northeast Germany), along with the ways socialist agriculture is remembered and valorized nowadays. Based on interviews and written sources on agricultural history, the author sketches out divergent trajectories of sovkhoism. Comparing the two cases, the author examines how skill, spatial distance between farmhands and managers in a setting of mutual connivance, and ideas about land ownership shaped local varieties of give-and-take, and ultimately, how they informed memories about socialist agriculture.","PeriodicalId":307724,"journal":{"name":"Region: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Region: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/reg.2020.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:This contribution seeks to compare the different preconditions and historical dynamics of socialist agriculture in two adjacent regions (northwest Poland and northeast Germany), along with the ways socialist agriculture is remembered and valorized nowadays. Based on interviews and written sources on agricultural history, the author sketches out divergent trajectories of sovkhoism. Comparing the two cases, the author examines how skill, spatial distance between farmhands and managers in a setting of mutual connivance, and ideas about land ownership shaped local varieties of give-and-take, and ultimately, how they informed memories about socialist agriculture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
集体中的私人:比较波兰和德国的苏维埃主义的历史和遗产
摘要:本文旨在比较两个相邻地区(波兰西北部和德国东北部)社会主义农业的不同先决条件和历史动态,以及当今社会主义农业的记忆和发展方式。基于对农业历史的采访和书面资料,作者勾勒出了农民主义的不同轨迹。通过对这两个案例的比较,作者考察了在相互纵容的环境下,农民和管理者之间的技能、空间距离以及对土地所有权的看法如何塑造了当地各种形式的交换,最终,它们如何影响了人们对社会主义农业的记忆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Uzbek Migrants in Türkiye: Gender, Satisfaction in Türkiye, and Return Intentions On Arid Ground: Political Ecologies of Empire in Russian Central Asia by Jennifer Keating (review) Analyzing the Compatibility of the Remedial Right of Secession with Regard to the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Arrested Development: The Soviet Union in Ghana, Guinea, and Mali, 1955–1968 by Alessandro Iandolo (review) "Save the Children!": The Symbol of Childhood and (De)Legitimation of Power in Russian Protests, 2017–21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1