[Conversation during regional anesthesia].

IF 1.9 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE Regional-Anaesthesie Pub Date : 1991-03-01
H J Hannich, I Gralow, C Magh
{"title":"[Conversation during regional anesthesia].","authors":"H J Hannich,&nbsp;I Gralow,&nbsp;C Magh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>From the psychological point of view, regional anesthesia is something special because the patient experiences his operation consciously. This means that the anesthetist is required not only to guarantee a safe anesthetic, but also to recognize the special needs of the patients, to enter into them adequately, and thus to support the patient's own strategies for coping with his situation. The question arises as to what extent the anesthetist's behavior meets the patient's psychological requirements. For this reason, the conversation between patient and anesthetist was monitored during 17 operations under regional anesthesia and investigated by means of a quantitative speech analysis. It was shown that the anesthetist clearly predominated in the course of the conversation: particularly during the time when the patient was preparing himself for the operation, it was the anesthetist who actively framed the communication by numerous questions and conversational activities while the patient responsively remains passive. The anesthetist spoke simply and clearly to the patient. Prime consideration was given to explaining the anesthetic procedure and the operation. There were not many attempts by the physician to also deal with the patient's psychic state. On the while, communication was concerned with the quick and easy performance of anesthesia. This was also demonstrated by the fact that conversation between the anesthetist and the patient was nearly absent during the operation.</p>","PeriodicalId":77604,"journal":{"name":"Regional-Anaesthesie","volume":"14 2","pages":"25-31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"1991-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional-Anaesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From the psychological point of view, regional anesthesia is something special because the patient experiences his operation consciously. This means that the anesthetist is required not only to guarantee a safe anesthetic, but also to recognize the special needs of the patients, to enter into them adequately, and thus to support the patient's own strategies for coping with his situation. The question arises as to what extent the anesthetist's behavior meets the patient's psychological requirements. For this reason, the conversation between patient and anesthetist was monitored during 17 operations under regional anesthesia and investigated by means of a quantitative speech analysis. It was shown that the anesthetist clearly predominated in the course of the conversation: particularly during the time when the patient was preparing himself for the operation, it was the anesthetist who actively framed the communication by numerous questions and conversational activities while the patient responsively remains passive. The anesthetist spoke simply and clearly to the patient. Prime consideration was given to explaining the anesthetic procedure and the operation. There were not many attempts by the physician to also deal with the patient's psychic state. On the while, communication was concerned with the quick and easy performance of anesthesia. This was also demonstrated by the fact that conversation between the anesthetist and the patient was nearly absent during the operation.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[区域麻醉时的谈话]。
从心理学的角度来看,区域麻醉是一种特殊的麻醉,因为患者是有意识地经历手术的。这意味着麻醉师不仅要保证麻醉的安全,而且要认识到病人的特殊需求,充分地了解他们,从而支持病人自己的策略来应对他的情况。问题是麻醉师的行为在多大程度上满足了病人的心理需求。因此,我们在17例区域麻醉手术中监测了患者与麻醉师之间的对话,并通过定量言语分析进行了调查。结果表明,麻醉师在谈话过程中明显占主导地位:特别是在患者准备手术的时候,麻醉师通过大量的问题和对话活动积极地组织交流,而患者则保持被动。麻醉师对病人讲得简单明了。首先考虑的是解释麻醉程序和手术。医生并没有多次尝试去处理病人的精神状态。与此同时,沟通是关于麻醉的快速和容易的表现。在手术过程中,麻醉师和患者之间几乎没有对话,这也证明了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[An epidural spinal abscess as a lethal complication of peridural anesthesia]. [Knotting of a peridural catheter]. [A simple technique for estimating the level of analgesia in regional anesthesia]. [CSE--the combination of spinal and epidural anesthesia]. [Comments on the paper by R. Schürg et al. Maternal and neonatal plasma concentrations of bupivacaine during peridural anesthesia for cesarean section].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1