Assessment of Relationship between Road Roughness and Pavement Surface Condition

Satkar Shrestha, R. Khadka
{"title":"Assessment of Relationship between Road Roughness and Pavement Surface Condition","authors":"Satkar Shrestha, R. Khadka","doi":"10.3126/jacem.v6i0.38357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pavement evaluation is the most significant procedure to minimize the degradation of the pavement both functionally and structurally. Proper evaluation of pavement is hence required to prolong the life year of the pavement, which thus needs to be addressed in the policy level. By this, the development of genuine indices are to be formulated and used for the evaluation. In context of evaluating the pavement indices for measuring the pavement roughness, International Roughness Index (IRI) is used, whereas for calculating the surface distress, indices as such Surface Distress Index (SDI) and Pavement Condition Index (PCI) are used. Past evaluating schemes used by Department of Roads (DOR) were limited to IRI for evaluating the pavement roughness and SDI for measuring the surface distress, which has least variability in categorizing the pavement according to the deformation. Apart from these, PCI which has wide range of categories for evaluating pavement, is not seen in practice in Nepal due to its cumbersome field work and calculations. In this paper the relationship is developed relating PCI with IRI and SDI using regression analysis by using Microsoft excel. In the other words, the pavement roughness index is compared with the surface distress indices. In 2017, 23.6Km of feeder roads in various locations of Kathmandu and Lalitpur districts were taken for this study which comprised of 236 sample data, each segmented to 100m. For this, IRI was sourced as secondary data, obtained from Highway Maintenance and Information System (HMIS) unit, Kathmandu, whereas, PCI and SDI were calculated from the field data obtained from the survey carried out in those sections manually. Then after, among 236 samples, 189 samples were taken for the relationship development which was then validated using 47 remaining samples. Furthermore, in the year, 2019 additional 3 Km of data was taken for validating the obtained relationships. It was done to improve the numerical predictions of data with such variation and thus satisfactory relationships were developed among the indices discussed in this study. The regression relationships between the two indices, IRI-PCI and IRI-SDI were thus significantly obtained. It has been found that the R² value for these relationships developed were statistically significant with 5% level of significance. The R² value for all the relationships showed that these relationships could be used for predicting the indices which would help in evaluating the pavement.","PeriodicalId":306432,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced College of Engineering and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced College of Engineering and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jacem.v6i0.38357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Pavement evaluation is the most significant procedure to minimize the degradation of the pavement both functionally and structurally. Proper evaluation of pavement is hence required to prolong the life year of the pavement, which thus needs to be addressed in the policy level. By this, the development of genuine indices are to be formulated and used for the evaluation. In context of evaluating the pavement indices for measuring the pavement roughness, International Roughness Index (IRI) is used, whereas for calculating the surface distress, indices as such Surface Distress Index (SDI) and Pavement Condition Index (PCI) are used. Past evaluating schemes used by Department of Roads (DOR) were limited to IRI for evaluating the pavement roughness and SDI for measuring the surface distress, which has least variability in categorizing the pavement according to the deformation. Apart from these, PCI which has wide range of categories for evaluating pavement, is not seen in practice in Nepal due to its cumbersome field work and calculations. In this paper the relationship is developed relating PCI with IRI and SDI using regression analysis by using Microsoft excel. In the other words, the pavement roughness index is compared with the surface distress indices. In 2017, 23.6Km of feeder roads in various locations of Kathmandu and Lalitpur districts were taken for this study which comprised of 236 sample data, each segmented to 100m. For this, IRI was sourced as secondary data, obtained from Highway Maintenance and Information System (HMIS) unit, Kathmandu, whereas, PCI and SDI were calculated from the field data obtained from the survey carried out in those sections manually. Then after, among 236 samples, 189 samples were taken for the relationship development which was then validated using 47 remaining samples. Furthermore, in the year, 2019 additional 3 Km of data was taken for validating the obtained relationships. It was done to improve the numerical predictions of data with such variation and thus satisfactory relationships were developed among the indices discussed in this study. The regression relationships between the two indices, IRI-PCI and IRI-SDI were thus significantly obtained. It has been found that the R² value for these relationships developed were statistically significant with 5% level of significance. The R² value for all the relationships showed that these relationships could be used for predicting the indices which would help in evaluating the pavement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
路面平整度与路面状况关系的评价
路面评价是减少路面功能和结构退化的最重要的步骤。因此,需要对路面进行适当的评价,以延长路面的使用寿命,因此需要在政策一级加以解决。以此为基础,制定真正的评价指标,并用于评价。在评价路面指标时,使用国际粗糙度指数(IRI)来衡量路面粗糙度,而在计算路面损伤时,使用表面损伤指数(SDI)和路面状况指数(PCI)等指标。公路部(DOR)过去使用的评价方案仅限于评价路面粗糙度的IRI方案和测量路面破损程度的SDI方案,该方案在根据变形对路面进行分类方面变异性最小。除此之外,PCI具有广泛的评估路面的类别,由于其繁琐的现场工作和计算,在尼泊尔的实践中没有看到。本文利用excel软件对PCI与IRI、SDI之间的关系进行了回归分析。换句话说,将路面粗糙度指数与路面损伤指数进行比较。2017年,加德满都和拉利特普尔地区不同地点的23.6公里支线公路被用于这项研究,该研究由236个样本数据组成,每个样本数据被分割为100米。为此,IRI是从加德满都公路养护和信息系统(HMIS)单位获得的辅助数据,而PCI和SDI是从在这些路段进行的手工调查获得的实地数据计算出来的。然后,在236个样本中,选取189个样本进行关系发展,然后使用剩余的47个样本进行验证。此外,在2019年,额外采集了3公里的数据来验证所获得的关系。这样做是为了改进具有这种变化的数据的数值预测,从而在研究中讨论的指标之间建立了令人满意的关系。从而得到了IRI-PCI和IRI-SDI两个指标之间的回归关系。我们发现,这些关系发展的R²值在统计学上显著,显著性水平为5%。所有关系的R²值表明,这些关系可以用来预测有助于评价路面的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Energy Performance Evaluation of Domestic Airport Departure Hall TIA, Kathmandu Production and Carbon Emission Calculation of Bricks Incorporating Construction And Demolition Waste and Pet Pellets Design Demand of RC Building as per Soil Type Pre and Post Earthquake Slope Stability Analysis Using Equivalent Linear Method – a Case Study of Jure Landslide Performance Evaluation of Artificial Angular Fly Ash Aggregate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1