The Gompertz - Makeham Coupling as a Dynamic Life Table

Abraham Zaks
{"title":"The Gompertz - Makeham Coupling as a Dynamic Life Table","authors":"Abraham Zaks","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1739205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A very famous law of mortality was introduced by Gompertz in 1825 in [G] . In 1860 Makeham introduced in [M] a modification to obtain another law of mortality. Both these laws assume that the population under consideration is stable. The two laws differ by a constant term in the force of mortality. The updated approach to the study of population presume that mortality changes over time. The difference stems from observing that the expectancy of life changes over the years. There were made various attempts to introduce dynamic life tables, and the Lee-Carter model has this advantage. The Lee-Carter model in [LC] describes better the mortality under changes over time as was shown recently by ([M ) . We intend to study the difference arising from a fixed change in the force of mortality and the Gompertz and Makeham cases may serve to demonstrate such a change. The difference in the expectancy of life in both cases affects directly the corresponding life tables, and consequently the annuities (for life, term annuitie and deferred ), as well as the assurances (whole life, term and endowment) , and the premiums and reserves in the various cases. The changes in a stable life table model may serve to evaluate the changes that arise in terms of a sensitive analysis of various assurance plans. Consequently there results a tool to cope with evaluating the effect of change in the force of mortality.","PeriodicalId":307788,"journal":{"name":"EP: Pension Type (Defined Benefit/Defined Contribution) (Topic)","volume":"112 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EP: Pension Type (Defined Benefit/Defined Contribution) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1739205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A very famous law of mortality was introduced by Gompertz in 1825 in [G] . In 1860 Makeham introduced in [M] a modification to obtain another law of mortality. Both these laws assume that the population under consideration is stable. The two laws differ by a constant term in the force of mortality. The updated approach to the study of population presume that mortality changes over time. The difference stems from observing that the expectancy of life changes over the years. There were made various attempts to introduce dynamic life tables, and the Lee-Carter model has this advantage. The Lee-Carter model in [LC] describes better the mortality under changes over time as was shown recently by ([M ) . We intend to study the difference arising from a fixed change in the force of mortality and the Gompertz and Makeham cases may serve to demonstrate such a change. The difference in the expectancy of life in both cases affects directly the corresponding life tables, and consequently the annuities (for life, term annuitie and deferred ), as well as the assurances (whole life, term and endowment) , and the premiums and reserves in the various cases. The changes in a stable life table model may serve to evaluate the changes that arise in terms of a sensitive analysis of various assurance plans. Consequently there results a tool to cope with evaluating the effect of change in the force of mortality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动态生命表中的Gompertz - Makeham耦合
一个非常著名的死亡率定律是由Gompertz在1825年提出的[G]。1860年,Makeham在[M]中引入了一种修正,以获得另一种死亡率法则。这两种定律都假定所考虑的种群是稳定的。这两条定律在死亡率方面有一个常数项的差别。人口研究的最新方法假定死亡率随时间而变化。这种差异源于对预期寿命随年龄变化的观察。有各种各样的尝试来引入动态生命表,李-卡特模型有这个优势。[LC]中的Lee-Carter模型更好地描述了随时间变化的死亡率,最近([M])显示了这一点。我们打算研究死亡率的固定变化所产生的差异,Gompertz和Makeham的案例可能有助于证明这种变化。在这两种情况下,预期寿命的差异直接影响到相应的生命表,从而影响到年金(终身年金、定期年金和递延年金),以及保险(终身、定期和养老),以及各种情况下的保费和准备金。稳定生命表模型中的变化可用于评估根据各种保证计划的敏感分析而产生的变化。因此,就产生了一种工具来应付评估死亡率力量变化的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Gompertz - Makeham Coupling as a Dynamic Life Table Pricing Risk in Corporate Pension Plans: Understanding the Real Pension Deal A Lifecycle Analysis of Defined Benefit Pension Plans Pension Developments and Reforms in Transition Economies Resurrecting the Defined Benefit Pension Plan: A New Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1