Quantification of Gait Disorder from Asymmetry in Explicit and Implicit Gait Measures of Hemiplegic Post-Stroke Individuals using a Wearable System

Shashi Ranjan, P. Pallavi, U. Lahiri
{"title":"Quantification of Gait Disorder from Asymmetry in Explicit and Implicit Gait Measures of Hemiplegic Post-Stroke Individuals using a Wearable System","authors":"Shashi Ranjan, P. Pallavi, U. Lahiri","doi":"10.1109/REEDCON57544.2023.10151122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hemiplegic individuals are characterized by reduction in their ability on the paretic side leading to gait asymmetry and proneness to fall while walking. Gait asymmetry can be quantified in terms of asymmetry in implicit (related to lower limb muscle activation) and explicit (e.g., step time, %stance, etc.) measures. Although the implicit and explicit measures can be complementary in nature, yet none of the previous studies have looked into the asymmetry in both the explicit and implicit measures of gait of hemiplegic individuals. This is necessary, since similar walking pattern can possibly cause different lower limb muscle activation (affecting implicit measures), though the explicit measures of gait might remain the same/different. Thus, investigating the complementarity in such measures is crucial. Again, the asymmetry measures can be pronounced when one executes multiple tasks during walking simultaneously. In our present study, we computed the asymmetry in the implicit and explicit measures of gait in a time- synched manner by using a wearable system. We conducted a study with 12 healthy and 14 age-matched hemiplegic individuals who walked under single, dual, and multiple task (MTC) conditions. Results of hierarchical clustering showed the importance of complementarity in the asymmetry of implicit and explicit measures under MTC while distinguishing those with gait disorder from their healthy counterparts (classification accuracy: 88%) and identifying the extent of the disorder (classification accuracy: ~85%). Also, the asymmetry in these measures under MTC was found to have clinical relevance with regard to fear of fall.","PeriodicalId":429116,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Recent Advances in Electrical, Electronics & Digital Healthcare Technologies (REEDCON)","volume":"214 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Recent Advances in Electrical, Electronics & Digital Healthcare Technologies (REEDCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/REEDCON57544.2023.10151122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hemiplegic individuals are characterized by reduction in their ability on the paretic side leading to gait asymmetry and proneness to fall while walking. Gait asymmetry can be quantified in terms of asymmetry in implicit (related to lower limb muscle activation) and explicit (e.g., step time, %stance, etc.) measures. Although the implicit and explicit measures can be complementary in nature, yet none of the previous studies have looked into the asymmetry in both the explicit and implicit measures of gait of hemiplegic individuals. This is necessary, since similar walking pattern can possibly cause different lower limb muscle activation (affecting implicit measures), though the explicit measures of gait might remain the same/different. Thus, investigating the complementarity in such measures is crucial. Again, the asymmetry measures can be pronounced when one executes multiple tasks during walking simultaneously. In our present study, we computed the asymmetry in the implicit and explicit measures of gait in a time- synched manner by using a wearable system. We conducted a study with 12 healthy and 14 age-matched hemiplegic individuals who walked under single, dual, and multiple task (MTC) conditions. Results of hierarchical clustering showed the importance of complementarity in the asymmetry of implicit and explicit measures under MTC while distinguishing those with gait disorder from their healthy counterparts (classification accuracy: 88%) and identifying the extent of the disorder (classification accuracy: ~85%). Also, the asymmetry in these measures under MTC was found to have clinical relevance with regard to fear of fall.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用可穿戴系统对脑卒中后偏瘫患者的显式和隐式步态测量中不对称引起的步态紊乱进行量化
偏瘫患者的特点是他们的能力下降,导致步态不对称,走路时容易摔倒。步态不对称可以通过内隐(与下肢肌肉激活有关)和外显(例如,步数、姿势等)测量的不对称来量化。虽然内隐测量和外显测量在本质上是互补的,但以往的研究都没有对偏瘫个体的外显测量和内隐测量的不对称性进行研究。这是必要的,因为相似的步行模式可能会导致不同的下肢肌肉激活(影响隐性测量),尽管步态的显式测量可能保持相同/不同。因此,调查这些措施的互补性是至关重要的。同样,当一个人在行走过程中同时执行多项任务时,这种不对称性也会明显表现出来。在我们目前的研究中,我们使用可穿戴系统以时间同步的方式计算了隐式和显式步态测量的不对称性。我们对12名健康和14名年龄匹配的偏瘫患者进行了一项研究,他们分别在单任务、双任务和多任务(MTC)条件下行走。分层聚类结果表明,在MTC下,内隐和外显测量的不对称性中互补性的重要性,在区分步态障碍与健康步态障碍(分类准确率:88%)和识别步态障碍的程度(分类准确率:~85%)方面具有重要意义。此外,MTC下这些测量的不对称被发现与害怕跌倒有临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advanced ICU Patient Monitoring With Sensor Integration, IV Detection WITH Canny Edge Detection and ECG Monitoring With Live Feed Optimal DG placement for power loss reduction using GWO algorithm Estimating the Stability of Smart Grids Using Optimised Artificial Neural Network Effectiveness of Principal Component Analysis in Functional Mapping of Gene Expression Profiles A Review of the Optimal Allocation of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1