Summary of COOP'04 workshop on interaction and knowledge management

M. Lewkowicz
{"title":"Summary of COOP'04 workshop on interaction and knowledge management","authors":"M. Lewkowicz","doi":"10.1145/1027228.1027229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge management is often studied from the point of view of knowledge as an object which has to be clarified, archived, spread, shared. But there is another point of view in which we want to focus during this workshop, which is knowledge in action, or \"knowing\", instead of \"knowledge\", as (Cook, Brown, 1999) or (Pfeffer, Sutton, 1999) make the distinction. We thus fit in a historical current initiated by (Bannon, Kuutti, 1996), who used to distinguish a passive and an active or constructive view of Organizational Memory. We could then say that we adopt a social approach of Knowledge Management (Erickson, Kellogg, 2001; Ackerman et al. 2003), contrary to other works which deal with information problems. In other words we could claim stopping to think in terms of knowledge management, and starting to think in terms of supporting the larger social context in which knowledge management is embedded.","PeriodicalId":390207,"journal":{"name":"ACM Siggroup Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Siggroup Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1027228.1027229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Knowledge management is often studied from the point of view of knowledge as an object which has to be clarified, archived, spread, shared. But there is another point of view in which we want to focus during this workshop, which is knowledge in action, or "knowing", instead of "knowledge", as (Cook, Brown, 1999) or (Pfeffer, Sutton, 1999) make the distinction. We thus fit in a historical current initiated by (Bannon, Kuutti, 1996), who used to distinguish a passive and an active or constructive view of Organizational Memory. We could then say that we adopt a social approach of Knowledge Management (Erickson, Kellogg, 2001; Ackerman et al. 2003), contrary to other works which deal with information problems. In other words we could claim stopping to think in terms of knowledge management, and starting to think in terms of supporting the larger social context in which knowledge management is embedded.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COOP'04互动与知识管理研讨会摘要
知识管理通常是从知识作为一个对象的角度来研究的,这个对象必须被澄清、存档、传播、共享。但在本次研讨会中,我们想要关注的是另一个观点,即行动中的知识,或“知道”,而不是“知识”,正如(Cook, Brown, 1999)或(Pfeffer, Sutton, 1999)所区分的那样。因此,我们符合(Bannon, Kuutti, 1996)发起的历史潮流,他曾经区分过组织记忆的被动和主动或建设性观点。然后我们可以说我们采用了知识管理的社会方法(埃里克森,凯洛格,2001;Ackerman et al. 2003),与其他处理信息问题的作品相反。换句话说,我们可以停止从知识管理的角度来思考,并开始从支持知识管理嵌入的更大的社会背景的角度来思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reflexivity in e-science: virtual communities and research institutions The engine of the underground: the Elite-Kiddie divide Hacking human: data-archaeology and surveillance in social networks MOO: revival or extinction? Small pornographies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1