Payday Loans versus Pawn Shops: The Effects of Loan Fee Limits on Household Use

R. Avery, Katherine A. Samolyk
{"title":"Payday Loans versus Pawn Shops: The Effects of Loan Fee Limits on Household Use","authors":"R. Avery, Katherine A. Samolyk","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2634584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses data from the January 2009 FDIC Unbanked/Underbanked Supplement to the Current Population Survey (CPS) to examine how household use of payday loans and pawn shops is related to limits on loan fees set by states. We use information in the CPS to measure the relationship between household characteristics and payday loan and pawn shop usage and to control for these factors in examining the relationship between usage and state fee ceilings. We find little relationship between levels of fee ceilings in their current range and payday loan usage. Results for pawn shops indicate somewhat more variation in usage over the current range of pawn-shop fee ceilings. The results are generally consistent with conjectures that because of scale economies at the store level, payday lenders can adjust the scale of store operations to maintain profit margins and thus continue to lend over a range of fee ceilings. This finding suggests that lowering loan fee ceilings up to some point can benefit borrowers, many of whom report using these loan to meet basic living expenses or to make up for lost income.","PeriodicalId":196559,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Consumer Credit Issues (Sub-Topic)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Consumer Credit Issues (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2634584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

This paper uses data from the January 2009 FDIC Unbanked/Underbanked Supplement to the Current Population Survey (CPS) to examine how household use of payday loans and pawn shops is related to limits on loan fees set by states. We use information in the CPS to measure the relationship between household characteristics and payday loan and pawn shop usage and to control for these factors in examining the relationship between usage and state fee ceilings. We find little relationship between levels of fee ceilings in their current range and payday loan usage. Results for pawn shops indicate somewhat more variation in usage over the current range of pawn-shop fee ceilings. The results are generally consistent with conjectures that because of scale economies at the store level, payday lenders can adjust the scale of store operations to maintain profit margins and thus continue to lend over a range of fee ceilings. This finding suggests that lowering loan fee ceilings up to some point can benefit borrowers, many of whom report using these loan to meet basic living expenses or to make up for lost income.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发薪日贷款与典当行:贷款费用限制对家庭使用的影响
本文使用2009年1月FDIC对当前人口调查(CPS)的无银行账户/未充分银行账户补充数据来研究家庭使用发薪日贷款和典当行与各州设定的贷款费用限制之间的关系。我们使用CPS中的信息来衡量家庭特征与发薪日贷款和典当行使用之间的关系,并在检查使用与州收费上限之间的关系时控制这些因素。我们发现,当前范围内的收费上限水平与发薪日贷款的使用情况之间几乎没有关系。典当行的结果表明,在当前的典当行收费上限范围内,使用情况有所不同。研究结果与以下猜想大体一致:由于商店层面的规模经济,发薪日贷款机构可以调整商店运营规模以维持利润率,从而在一定的收费上限范围内继续放贷。这一发现表明,在某种程度上降低贷款费用上限可以使借款人受益,其中许多人报告使用这些贷款来满足基本生活费用或弥补收入损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Credit Access and Mobility during the Flint Water Crisis American Student Loans: Repayment and Valuation Is the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive Fit to Effectively Tackle Abusive Debt Collection? A Critical Evaluation Fintech Lenders’ Responses to Senate Probe Heighten Fears of Educational Redlining PLUS Borrowing in Texas: Repayment Expectations, Experience, and Hindsight by Minority-Serving Institution Status
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1