Pathology of The Fourth Generation of Accreditation From The Point of View of Managers of Selected Hospitals of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences: a Qualitative Study

O. Zare, A. Aghighi, A. Eslambolchi
{"title":"Pathology of The Fourth Generation of Accreditation From The Point of View of Managers of Selected Hospitals of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences: a Qualitative Study","authors":"O. Zare, A. Aghighi, A. Eslambolchi","doi":"10.18502/mshsj.v8i1.12886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:It is necessary to evaluate the hospitals with the accreditation model and obtain the opinions and suggestions of the managers of the centers in order to improve the existing models more and more. The present study has been carried out with the aim of the fourth generation pathology of accreditation from the point of view of managers of selected hospitals of Hamedan University of Medical Sciences. \nMethods: This research is a qualitative study with a content analysis approach, which was done in 2022. In order to collect data, in-depth and semi-structured interviews were used. The research community included 26 senior and middle managers of selected 8 hospitals of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. Sampling was done purposefully.The data was analyzed by content analysis using MaxQDA 12 software. \nResults: According to the results, the challenges related to evaluators, hospitals, evaluation time, the nature of metrics, university staff experts and finally related to the announcement of the results were presented as the main themes of the pathology of the fourth generation of accreditation from the point of view of senior and middle managers. Among the aforementioned factors, the challenges related to hospitals, evaluators and university staff experts had the highest frequency compared to the challenges related to the evaluation time, the nature of the metrics, and the announcement of the results. \nConclusion: According to the findings of this research, after the pathology of the fourth generation accreditation method, it was determined that each of the accreditation areas related to evaluators, hospitals, evaluation time, the nature of metrics, university staff experts and finally the announcement of the results have not been sufficiently considered. Therefore, it is suggested that these cases be included in the future revisions of accreditation standards and criteria by the relevant officials. \n ","PeriodicalId":324632,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Management Strategies in Health System","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Management Strategies in Health System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/mshsj.v8i1.12886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:It is necessary to evaluate the hospitals with the accreditation model and obtain the opinions and suggestions of the managers of the centers in order to improve the existing models more and more. The present study has been carried out with the aim of the fourth generation pathology of accreditation from the point of view of managers of selected hospitals of Hamedan University of Medical Sciences. Methods: This research is a qualitative study with a content analysis approach, which was done in 2022. In order to collect data, in-depth and semi-structured interviews were used. The research community included 26 senior and middle managers of selected 8 hospitals of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. Sampling was done purposefully.The data was analyzed by content analysis using MaxQDA 12 software. Results: According to the results, the challenges related to evaluators, hospitals, evaluation time, the nature of metrics, university staff experts and finally related to the announcement of the results were presented as the main themes of the pathology of the fourth generation of accreditation from the point of view of senior and middle managers. Among the aforementioned factors, the challenges related to hospitals, evaluators and university staff experts had the highest frequency compared to the challenges related to the evaluation time, the nature of the metrics, and the announcement of the results. Conclusion: According to the findings of this research, after the pathology of the fourth generation accreditation method, it was determined that each of the accreditation areas related to evaluators, hospitals, evaluation time, the nature of metrics, university staff experts and finally the announcement of the results have not been sufficiently considered. Therefore, it is suggested that these cases be included in the future revisions of accreditation standards and criteria by the relevant officials.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从哈马丹医科大学选定医院管理者的角度看第四代认证病理学:定性研究
背景:有必要对采用认可模式的医院进行评估,并听取中心管理者的意见和建议,以进一步完善现有模式。本研究的目的是从哈马丹医科大学选定医院的管理人员的角度进行第四代鉴定病理学。方法:本研究采用定性研究和内容分析方法,于2022年完成。为了收集数据,我们采用了深度访谈和半结构化访谈。研究对象为哈马丹医科大学所属8家医院的26名中高层管理人员。抽样是有目的的。采用MaxQDA 12软件对数据进行内容分析。结果:根据结果,从中高层管理者的角度提出了与评估人员、医院、评估时间、指标性质、大学工作人员专家以及最终与结果公布相关的挑战,作为第四代认证病理学的主题。在上述因素中,与评估时间、指标性质和结果公布相关的挑战相比,与医院、评估人员和大学工作人员专家相关的挑战频率最高。结论:根据本研究的发现,经过对第四代病理学认证方法的研究,确定了每个认证领域中涉及到的评估者、医院、评估时间、指标性质、大学工作人员专家以及最终结果的公布都没有得到充分的考虑。因此,建议有关官员将这些情况列入今后修订的认可标准和准则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Estimating the Number of Department Secretaries Needed in in Hazrat Zainab Hospital Based on Workload Indicator of Staffing Needs in 2023 Management and Leadership Requirements in Hospital Service Supply Chain: A Mixed Method Study Cost and Income Estimation of Burn Intensive Care Units A Case Study in the Armed Forces Hospital Pathology of the Research Sector in Iran's Health System with a Focus on Future Donors’ Participation the Health System: A Double-Edged Sword
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1