Performance Comparison of Six-Phase PM Machine with Several Winding Layouts for EV Applications

Ahmed T. Abdel-Wahed, Mohamed Y. Metwly, A. Hemeida, A. Abdel-Khalik, M. Hamad, Shehab Ahmed
{"title":"Performance Comparison of Six-Phase PM Machine with Several Winding Layouts for EV Applications","authors":"Ahmed T. Abdel-Wahed, Mohamed Y. Metwly, A. Hemeida, A. Abdel-Khalik, M. Hamad, Shehab Ahmed","doi":"10.1109/CPERE56564.2023.10119595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents integrated on-board battery charging of electric vehicles (EVs) utilizing a six-phase drivetrain; namely, a six-phase permanent magnet (PM) machine equipped with fractional slot concentrated winding (FSCW) and a six-phase inverter. Integrated chargers outperform conventional on-board battery chargers (OBCs) since they exploit the propulsion elements in the charging process, which yields a reduction in the cost and weight of the EVs. Various FSCW slot/pole combinations have shown promise in EV applications, such as 12-slot/l0-pole and 18-slot/l6-pole. However, six-phase windings, i.e., dual threephase (D3P), symmetrical six-phase (S6P), and asymmetrical sixphase (A6P), are not viable for all slot/pole combinations. For example, the six-phase 18-slot/l6-pole machine can only be configured with a D3P winding configuration. Moreover, it is proven in the literature that the A6P is better than the D3P under the EV charging process from the radial forces’ perspective. Thus, this paper presents a comprehensive comparison of two six-phase integrated battery chargers using surface-mount permanent magnet (SPM) machines with D3P and pseudo six-phase (P6P) winding arrangements. The machine is first designed based on the magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) model and optimized based on multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA). Finally, finite element (FE) simulations have been carried out to assess the two winding layouts under both operational modes. The P6P winding layout outperforms the D3P in the propulsion mode, offering a6% torque density enhancement, and in the charging mode, offering a much lower radial force.","PeriodicalId":169048,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE Conference on Power Electronics and Renewable Energy (CPERE)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE Conference on Power Electronics and Renewable Energy (CPERE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CPERE56564.2023.10119595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents integrated on-board battery charging of electric vehicles (EVs) utilizing a six-phase drivetrain; namely, a six-phase permanent magnet (PM) machine equipped with fractional slot concentrated winding (FSCW) and a six-phase inverter. Integrated chargers outperform conventional on-board battery chargers (OBCs) since they exploit the propulsion elements in the charging process, which yields a reduction in the cost and weight of the EVs. Various FSCW slot/pole combinations have shown promise in EV applications, such as 12-slot/l0-pole and 18-slot/l6-pole. However, six-phase windings, i.e., dual threephase (D3P), symmetrical six-phase (S6P), and asymmetrical sixphase (A6P), are not viable for all slot/pole combinations. For example, the six-phase 18-slot/l6-pole machine can only be configured with a D3P winding configuration. Moreover, it is proven in the literature that the A6P is better than the D3P under the EV charging process from the radial forces’ perspective. Thus, this paper presents a comprehensive comparison of two six-phase integrated battery chargers using surface-mount permanent magnet (SPM) machines with D3P and pseudo six-phase (P6P) winding arrangements. The machine is first designed based on the magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) model and optimized based on multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA). Finally, finite element (FE) simulations have been carried out to assess the two winding layouts under both operational modes. The P6P winding layout outperforms the D3P in the propulsion mode, offering a6% torque density enhancement, and in the charging mode, offering a much lower radial force.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电动汽车中几种绕组布局的六相永磁电机性能比较
本文介绍了一种采用六相传动系统的电动汽车车载集成充电系统。即配备分数槽集中绕组(FSCW)的六相永磁(PM)电机和六相逆变器。集成充电器优于传统的车载电池充电器(OBCs),因为它们在充电过程中利用了推进元件,从而降低了电动汽车的成本和重量。各种FSCW槽/极组合在电动汽车应用中显示出前景,例如12槽/ 10极和18槽/ 16极。然而,六相绕组,即双三相(D3P),对称六相(S6P)和不对称六相(A6P),并不适用于所有槽/极组合。例如,六相18槽/ 16极机只能配置D3P绕组配置。此外,从径向力的角度来看,有文献证明在电动汽车充电过程中,A6P优于D3P。因此,本文全面比较了两种采用表面贴装永磁(SPM)电机的六相集成电池充电器,分别采用D3P和伪六相(P6P)绕组布置。首先基于磁等效电路(MEC)模型设计机床,并基于多目标遗传算法(MOGA)进行优化。最后,对两种工作模式下的两种绕组布局进行了有限元仿真。P6P绕组布局在推进模式下优于D3P,可提供6%的扭矩密度增强;在充电模式下,可提供更低的径向力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hybrid Maximum-Power-Point Tracking Algorithm using Voltage Sweep and P & O for T-Source Inverter PV Applications Numerical Evaluation of Overall Efficiency for Solar Photovoltaic and Thermal Hybrid System Model Free Artificial Neural Network for an Induction Machine Optimized Inter-Turn Short Circuit Fault Diagnosis for Induction Motors using Neural Networks with LeLeRU Weighting-Factorless Sequential Model Predictive Torque Control of a Six-Phase AC Machine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1