EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT PLANTING SYSTEMS ON SOME PRODUCTIVE AND QUALITY TRAITS OF RICE

Danica Andreevska, Dobre Andov, E. Simeonovska, T. Dimitrovski, Jashka Ibraim
{"title":"EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT PLANTING SYSTEMS ON SOME PRODUCTIVE AND QUALITY TRAITS OF RICE","authors":"Danica Andreevska, Dobre Andov, E. Simeonovska, T. Dimitrovski, Jashka Ibraim","doi":"10.55302/jafes18722158a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The traditional planting system of rice in the Republic of Macedonia is wet direct seeding (hand broadcasting of seeds into pre-standing water in the fields). In this paper, the effects of different planting methods of rice (wet seeding as well as dry seeding by using seed drills) on productivity and quality of rice are presented. Field trials were set up at the Experimental Station of the Institute of Agriculture – Skopje, locality Mishjak, Kocani region, with two varieties (San Andrea and Onice) included. The following planting systems were explored: 1. wet direct seeding, with seeding rate of 250 kg seeds per ha (control); 2. dry seeding, 150 kg seeds per ha; 3. dry seeding, 200 kg seeds per ha. During the harvesting, the number of tillers per m 2 , biological yield, paddy rice yield, head rice yield and white rice yield were analyzed. The highest number of tillers per m 2 (San Andrea 383.00 and Onice 731.33) and the highest average paddy yield (San Andrea 11,780.00 kg ha -1 and Onice 10,113.33 kg ha -1 ) were achieved in the control. The highest biological yield in Onice (21,493.33 kg ha -1 ) was found in the control, while in San Andrea (20,650.00 kg ha -1 ) in the treatment dry seeding, 150 kg seeds per ha. For the head rice yield, the highest percentage was determined in the control (San Andrea, 54.57%) and in the treatment dry seeding, 150 kg seeds per ha (Onice, 66.72 %). Both varieties (San Andrea with 6,428.35 kg ha -1 and Onice with 6,143.83 kg ha -1 ) reached the highest white rice yield in the control. In general, in the treatment dry seeding with 200 kg seeds per ha, the higher values of number of tillers per m 2 , paddy yield and white rice yield were assessed, compared to the treatment dry seeding with 150 kg seeds per ha, in both varieties.","PeriodicalId":414064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55302/jafes18722158a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The traditional planting system of rice in the Republic of Macedonia is wet direct seeding (hand broadcasting of seeds into pre-standing water in the fields). In this paper, the effects of different planting methods of rice (wet seeding as well as dry seeding by using seed drills) on productivity and quality of rice are presented. Field trials were set up at the Experimental Station of the Institute of Agriculture – Skopje, locality Mishjak, Kocani region, with two varieties (San Andrea and Onice) included. The following planting systems were explored: 1. wet direct seeding, with seeding rate of 250 kg seeds per ha (control); 2. dry seeding, 150 kg seeds per ha; 3. dry seeding, 200 kg seeds per ha. During the harvesting, the number of tillers per m 2 , biological yield, paddy rice yield, head rice yield and white rice yield were analyzed. The highest number of tillers per m 2 (San Andrea 383.00 and Onice 731.33) and the highest average paddy yield (San Andrea 11,780.00 kg ha -1 and Onice 10,113.33 kg ha -1 ) were achieved in the control. The highest biological yield in Onice (21,493.33 kg ha -1 ) was found in the control, while in San Andrea (20,650.00 kg ha -1 ) in the treatment dry seeding, 150 kg seeds per ha. For the head rice yield, the highest percentage was determined in the control (San Andrea, 54.57%) and in the treatment dry seeding, 150 kg seeds per ha (Onice, 66.72 %). Both varieties (San Andrea with 6,428.35 kg ha -1 and Onice with 6,143.83 kg ha -1 ) reached the highest white rice yield in the control. In general, in the treatment dry seeding with 200 kg seeds per ha, the higher values of number of tillers per m 2 , paddy yield and white rice yield were assessed, compared to the treatment dry seeding with 150 kg seeds per ha, in both varieties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同种植制度对水稻部分生产品质性状的影响
马其顿共和国传统的水稻种植系统是湿法直接播种(将种子用手播撒到田间的预积水中)。本文介绍了水稻不同种植方式(湿播和干播)对水稻产量和品质的影响。在科卡尼地区Mishjak地区斯科普里农业研究所实验站进行了田间试验,包括两个品种(San Andrea和Onice)。探索了以下几种种植制度:湿法直接播种,每公顷播种量250公斤(对照);2. 干播,每公顷150公斤种子;3.干播,每公顷200公斤种子。在收获期间,对分蘖数、生物产量、水稻产量、抽穗产量和白米产量进行了分析。对照的分蘖数最高(圣安德烈383.00和奥尼斯731.33),平均水稻产量最高(圣安德烈117800.00 kg ha -1和奥尼斯10113.33 kg ha -1)。对照的生物产量最高的是Onice (21,493.33 kg ha -1),而干播处理的San Andrea (20,650.00 kg ha -1),每公顷150 kg种子。在抽穗稻产量方面,对照(圣安德里亚,54.57%)和干播处理(每公顷150公斤,66.72%)的比例最高。两个品种(圣安德里亚6,428.35 kg ha -1和奥尼斯6,143.83 kg ha -1)在对照中均达到最高的白米产量。总的来说,在两个品种中,每公顷200公斤干播处理的分蘖数、水稻产量和白米产量均高于每公顷150公斤干播处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PRODUCTION OF APPLES AS A POSSIBILITY FOR FAMILY FARMS DEVELOPMENT LAND CONSOLIDATION – A TOOL FOR SUSTAINABLE RURAL DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGICAL CONTEXT AND DOMAINS OF VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS FOR POLICY MAKING: CASE IN REPUBLIC OF NORTH MACEDONIA INTRODUCTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMON MARKET ORGANISATION MEASURES THE ABILITY OF THE BOTTLED WATER SECTOR TO MEET THE NEEDS OF CONSUMERS IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1