The Evolution of Financial Risk Management

Kayahan Cantürk, Murat Tolga
{"title":"The Evolution of Financial Risk Management","authors":"Kayahan Cantürk, Murat Tolga","doi":"10.51410/jcgirm.9.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This paper aims to track the history of financial risk management and how this progress affected the evolution of financial risk management. In the first part of this paper, we will look at how risk is defined, the concept of risk management, and the transaction from risk philosophy to the risk culture. The second part examines the evolution of risk management and different models used in financial risk measurements, such as variance, covariance, standard deviation, and value at risk models. In the third part, the Bretton Woods system, its effects on the global financial system, and after the Bretton Woods system is studied. In the final cut, we conclude and present our recommendations for future studies.Methodology: This theoretical research will focus on the historical evolution of financial risk management and the financial tools used while measuring risk. The finance field has evolved with crises, technological developments, and globalization. While the finance field has been growing, how financial risks are defined, managed, and measured has also changed. In addition to these changes, the finance field was introduced with a new area called “blockchain” and new investment instruments called cryptocurrencies.Practical Implications: This theoretical research investigates the evolution of financial risk management from a historical perspective and argues that the current financial risk management tools are insufficient to project today’s risks fully.","PeriodicalId":147045,"journal":{"name":"Journal of corporate governance, insurance and risk management","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of corporate governance, insurance and risk management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51410/jcgirm.9.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to track the history of financial risk management and how this progress affected the evolution of financial risk management. In the first part of this paper, we will look at how risk is defined, the concept of risk management, and the transaction from risk philosophy to the risk culture. The second part examines the evolution of risk management and different models used in financial risk measurements, such as variance, covariance, standard deviation, and value at risk models. In the third part, the Bretton Woods system, its effects on the global financial system, and after the Bretton Woods system is studied. In the final cut, we conclude and present our recommendations for future studies.Methodology: This theoretical research will focus on the historical evolution of financial risk management and the financial tools used while measuring risk. The finance field has evolved with crises, technological developments, and globalization. While the finance field has been growing, how financial risks are defined, managed, and measured has also changed. In addition to these changes, the finance field was introduced with a new area called “blockchain” and new investment instruments called cryptocurrencies.Practical Implications: This theoretical research investigates the evolution of financial risk management from a historical perspective and argues that the current financial risk management tools are insufficient to project today’s risks fully.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融风险管理的演变
目的:本文旨在追溯财务风险管理的历史,以及这一进程如何影响财务风险管理的演变。在本文的第一部分,我们将看看风险是如何定义的,风险管理的概念,以及从风险哲学到风险文化的交易。第二部分考察了风险管理的演变和金融风险测量中使用的不同模型,如方差、协方差、标准差和风险值模型。第三部分对布雷顿森林体系及其对全球金融体系的影响进行了研究,并对布雷顿森林体系建立后的情况进行了分析。在最后的剪辑中,我们总结并提出我们对未来研究的建议。方法论:这一理论研究将侧重于金融风险管理的历史演变和金融工具的使用,而测量风险。金融领域随着危机、技术发展和全球化而发展。在金融领域不断发展的同时,金融风险的定义、管理和衡量方式也发生了变化。除了这些变化之外,金融领域还引入了一个名为“区块链”的新领域和名为加密货币的新投资工具。实践意义:本理论研究从历史的角度考察了金融风险管理的演变,认为当前的金融风险管理工具不足以全面预测当今的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can Voluntary Insurance Be a New Product in Bank-led e-banking Impact of Insurance Risk Management on Fixed Capital Formation in Nigeria. Relationship between Financial Development and Income Inequality for Turkey and Selected Countries with Similar Risk Identification Techniques in Retail Industry An evaluation of the carbon footprint problem in winter sports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1