Who Should Have Access to my Pointing Data?: Privacy Tradeoffs of Adaptive Assistive Technologies

Foad Hamidi, Kellie Poneres, Aaron K. Massey, A. Hurst
{"title":"Who Should Have Access to my Pointing Data?: Privacy Tradeoffs of Adaptive Assistive Technologies","authors":"Foad Hamidi, Kellie Poneres, Aaron K. Massey, A. Hurst","doi":"10.1145/3234695.3239331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Customizing assistive technologies based on user needs, abilities, and preferences is necessary for accessibility, especially for individuals whose abilities vary due to a diagnosis, medication, or other external factors. Adaptive Assistive Technologies (AATs) that can automatically monitor a user's current abilities and adapt functionality and appearance accordingly offer exciting solutions. However, there is an often-overlooked privacy tradeoff between usability and user privacy when designing such systems. We present a general privacy threat model analysis of AATs and contextualize it with findings from an interview study with older adults who experience pointing problems. We found that participants had positive attitude towards assistive technologies that gather their personal data but also had strong preferences for how their data should be used and who should have access to it. We identify a need to seriously consider privacy threats when designing assistive technologies to avoid exposing users to them.","PeriodicalId":110197,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3239331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Customizing assistive technologies based on user needs, abilities, and preferences is necessary for accessibility, especially for individuals whose abilities vary due to a diagnosis, medication, or other external factors. Adaptive Assistive Technologies (AATs) that can automatically monitor a user's current abilities and adapt functionality and appearance accordingly offer exciting solutions. However, there is an often-overlooked privacy tradeoff between usability and user privacy when designing such systems. We present a general privacy threat model analysis of AATs and contextualize it with findings from an interview study with older adults who experience pointing problems. We found that participants had positive attitude towards assistive technologies that gather their personal data but also had strong preferences for how their data should be used and who should have access to it. We identify a need to seriously consider privacy threats when designing assistive technologies to avoid exposing users to them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁应该有权访问我的指向数据?自适应辅助技术的隐私权衡
基于用户需求、能力和偏好定制辅助技术对于可访问性是必要的,特别是对于那些能力因诊断、药物或其他外部因素而变化的个人。自适应辅助技术(AATs)可以自动监控用户当前的能力,并相应地调整功能和外观,提供了令人兴奋的解决方案。然而,在设计这样的系统时,在可用性和用户隐私之间有一个经常被忽视的隐私权衡。我们提出了aat的一般隐私威胁模型分析,并将其与对经历指向问题的老年人的访谈研究结果联系起来。我们发现,参与者对收集他们个人数据的辅助技术持积极态度,但对如何使用他们的数据以及谁应该访问这些数据也有强烈的偏好。在设计辅助技术时,我们认为有必要认真考虑隐私威胁,以避免用户暴露在这些威胁之下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Examining Image-Based Button Labeling for Accessibility in Android Apps through Large-Scale Analysis HoloLearn "Siri Talks at You": An Empirical Investigation of Voice-Activated Personal Assistant (VAPA) Usage by Individuals Who Are Blind BrightLights: Gamifying Data Capture for Situational Visual Impairments Tangicraft
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1