“Is There A Measure On Earth?”: Hölderlin’s Poem “In lovely Blueness” In Light Of Heidegger’s Essay “. . . Poetically Man Dwells. . . .”

H. Weinfield
{"title":"“Is There A Measure On Earth?”: Hölderlin’s Poem “In lovely Blueness” In Light Of Heidegger’s Essay “. . . Poetically Man Dwells. . . .”","authors":"H. Weinfield","doi":"10.5840/JPHILNEPAL201061328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of measure embraces music and mathematics, law and jurisprudence, and such moral and ethical ideals as moderation and temperance. The word, in both its noun and verb forms, encompasses a wide range of meanings. Among the various definitions that the dictionary provides for the noun, some deal with proportionality and limits (an adequate or due portion; a moderate degree; a fixed or suitable limit; the dimensions of something being measured; an instrument for measuring; and a system for standard units of meaning), some with music and poetry (a melody, tune, or dance; rhythmic structure or movement; a metrical unit, foot; a grouping of a specified number of musical beats located between two vertical lines on a staff), and some with actions or legislative acts (a step planned or taken as a mean to an end; a proposed legislative act). The latent connection, implicit in the various meanings of the word, between poetry and legislation or government recalls Shelley's maxim in A Defence of Poetry that \"[p]oets are the unacknowledged legislators of the World.\" (1) Poetry employs measure, but its relationship to the concept of measure differs from that of other disciplines and other forms of discourse. Like those other forms of discourse, poetry can be seen as a way of approaching, grasping, and communicating experience, truth, or knowledge; and though to the popular imagination poetry is sometimes thought of as vague, to the extent that it employs measure with precision it is at least potentially more rather than less precise than other forms of discourse. Not only does poetry employ measure, it is wholly taken up with measuring, and, in a sense, nothing more than a measuring process of a certain kind. The eighteenth century referred to verses as numbers and considered music and poetry to be a kind of counting without being aware that one was counting. This is as much to say that, in addition to presenting and representing the world, the task of the poet involves measuring one thing against another, putting things in proportion, judging, evaluating, and criticizing. It is not, of course, that the world is merely given to the poet: poetry invention; but this too involves measuring and cannot be separated from measuring. Ultimately, poetry employs measure in order to measure. The same, of course, could be said of the sciences, but poetry is obviously distinct from the sciences in a number of ways. For one thing, the measure it employs is musical and affective, not merely mathematical (if poetry involves counting without being aware that one is counting, it also, of course, involves feeling); and for another, in contrast to the sciences, poetry has no positive knowledge to impart and no content distinct from its form. Form can never be separated from content in poetry because what poetry measures, in addition to a content of some kind, is its own form--or in other words, itself. By giving measure to language, poetry turns the instrument of discourse into something musical, something that measures itself as well as the world, and it is this double capacity for measuring that distinguishes the poem from all other modes or forms of discourse. Nevertheless, although form can never be separated from content--which means that poetic form and poetic measure do not exist prior to content or to the poet's engagement with whatever it is that will become the poem's content (for poetic measure and what is being measured are in reciprocal relations to one another and come into existence dialectically)--the question remains whether the distinctiveness of poetry consists not only in its form but also in its content (even in the abstract). In one sense, the answer is clearly, \"No.\" Poetry is entitled to take the world as its purview, and it is just as appropriate for a poet to write \"about\" (a word that can only be used heuristically in connection with poetry) a steam engine or someone dying of cancer as for an engineer to explain the engine's mechanism or for a physician to find ways to combat the disease. …","PeriodicalId":288505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/JPHILNEPAL201061328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of measure embraces music and mathematics, law and jurisprudence, and such moral and ethical ideals as moderation and temperance. The word, in both its noun and verb forms, encompasses a wide range of meanings. Among the various definitions that the dictionary provides for the noun, some deal with proportionality and limits (an adequate or due portion; a moderate degree; a fixed or suitable limit; the dimensions of something being measured; an instrument for measuring; and a system for standard units of meaning), some with music and poetry (a melody, tune, or dance; rhythmic structure or movement; a metrical unit, foot; a grouping of a specified number of musical beats located between two vertical lines on a staff), and some with actions or legislative acts (a step planned or taken as a mean to an end; a proposed legislative act). The latent connection, implicit in the various meanings of the word, between poetry and legislation or government recalls Shelley's maxim in A Defence of Poetry that "[p]oets are the unacknowledged legislators of the World." (1) Poetry employs measure, but its relationship to the concept of measure differs from that of other disciplines and other forms of discourse. Like those other forms of discourse, poetry can be seen as a way of approaching, grasping, and communicating experience, truth, or knowledge; and though to the popular imagination poetry is sometimes thought of as vague, to the extent that it employs measure with precision it is at least potentially more rather than less precise than other forms of discourse. Not only does poetry employ measure, it is wholly taken up with measuring, and, in a sense, nothing more than a measuring process of a certain kind. The eighteenth century referred to verses as numbers and considered music and poetry to be a kind of counting without being aware that one was counting. This is as much to say that, in addition to presenting and representing the world, the task of the poet involves measuring one thing against another, putting things in proportion, judging, evaluating, and criticizing. It is not, of course, that the world is merely given to the poet: poetry invention; but this too involves measuring and cannot be separated from measuring. Ultimately, poetry employs measure in order to measure. The same, of course, could be said of the sciences, but poetry is obviously distinct from the sciences in a number of ways. For one thing, the measure it employs is musical and affective, not merely mathematical (if poetry involves counting without being aware that one is counting, it also, of course, involves feeling); and for another, in contrast to the sciences, poetry has no positive knowledge to impart and no content distinct from its form. Form can never be separated from content in poetry because what poetry measures, in addition to a content of some kind, is its own form--or in other words, itself. By giving measure to language, poetry turns the instrument of discourse into something musical, something that measures itself as well as the world, and it is this double capacity for measuring that distinguishes the poem from all other modes or forms of discourse. Nevertheless, although form can never be separated from content--which means that poetic form and poetic measure do not exist prior to content or to the poet's engagement with whatever it is that will become the poem's content (for poetic measure and what is being measured are in reciprocal relations to one another and come into existence dialectically)--the question remains whether the distinctiveness of poetry consists not only in its form but also in its content (even in the abstract). In one sense, the answer is clearly, "No." Poetry is entitled to take the world as its purview, and it is just as appropriate for a poet to write "about" (a word that can only be used heuristically in connection with poetry) a steam engine or someone dying of cancer as for an engineer to explain the engine's mechanism or for a physician to find ways to combat the disease. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地球上有度量衡吗?: Hölderlin诗歌《在可爱的蓝色中》——海德格尔随笔的启示……诗意地居住. . . .”
尺度的概念包括音乐和数学,法律和法学,以及节制和节制等道德和伦理理想。这个词,无论是名词形式还是动词形式,都包含了广泛的含义。在词典为名词提供的各种定义中,有些涉及比例和限制(适当或适当的部分;中等程度;限制:固定的或适当的限制;尺寸:被测量的某物的尺寸;测量仪器:测量的仪器;以及一套标准意义单位的系统),有些与音乐和诗歌有关(旋律、曲调或舞蹈;节奏结构或运动;尺:格律单位,尺;一组特定数量的音乐节拍,位于五线谱上的两条竖线之间,有些带有动作或立法行为(为达到目的而计划或采取的步骤;提议的立法法案)。诗歌与立法或政府之间的潜在联系,隐含在这个词的各种含义中,让人想起雪莱在《为诗辩护》中的格言:“诗人是世界上未被承认的立法者。”(1)诗歌使用尺度,但它与尺度概念的关系不同于其他学科和其他话语形式。与其他话语形式一样,诗歌可以被视为一种接近、把握和交流经验、真理或知识的方式;尽管在大众的想象中,诗歌有时被认为是模糊的,但在某种程度上,它使用了精确的度量它至少比其他形式的话语更精确。诗歌不仅运用尺度,而且完全是一种尺度,在某种意义上,它只不过是一种特定的尺度过程。18世纪把诗句称为数字,认为音乐和诗歌是一种计数,而没有意识到自己在计数。这也就是说,诗人的任务除了表现和再现世界之外,还包括用一种事物来衡量另一种事物,把事物按比例排列,判断、评价和批评。当然,世界并不仅仅是给诗人的:诗歌的发明;但这也涉及测量,不能与测量分开。最终,诗歌是为了衡量而衡量。当然,科学也是如此,但诗歌在许多方面明显不同于科学。首先,它所采用的尺度是音乐的和情感的,而不仅仅是数学的(如果诗歌涉及到计数而没有意识到一个人在计数,它当然也涉及到感觉);另一方面,与科学相比,诗歌没有可以传授的积极知识,也没有与形式不同的内容。在诗歌中,形式永远不能与内容分开,因为诗歌所衡量的,除了某种内容之外,就是它自己的形式,或者换句话说,就是它本身。通过对语言进行测量,诗歌把话语的工具变成了某种音乐的东西,一种既能测量自身也能测量世界的东西,正是这种测量的双重能力使诗歌区别于所有其他的话语模式或形式。不过,虽然形式永远无法分开内容——这意味着诗歌形式和诗意的测量之前不存在的内容或诗人的参与等等,将成为诗的内容(诗意的测量和被测量的互惠关系,存在辩证),问题仍然在于,诗歌的特殊性不仅在其形式,还在于其内容(即使是在抽象)。从某种意义上说,答案显然是否定的。诗歌有权把世界作为自己的研究范围,诗人写一台蒸汽机或一个死于癌症的人(这个词只能在与诗歌联系在一起时启发式地使用),就像工程师解释蒸汽机的机制或医生找到对抗疾病的方法一样合适。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emily Dickinson: What Is Called Thinking at the Edge of Chaos? Relational Selves: Gender and Cultural Differences in Moral Reasoning Late Pound: The Case of Canto CVII The Reproduction of Subjectivity and the Turnover-time of Ideology: Speculating with German Idealism, Marx, and Adorno Toward an Ethics of Speculative Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1