LATIN FOR DENOTING THE SOCIO-LEGAL STATUS IN UKRAINIAN DOCUMENTS (XVI-XVIITH CENTURIES).

N. Davydenko
{"title":"LATIN FOR DENOTING THE SOCIO-LEGAL STATUS IN UKRAINIAN DOCUMENTS (XVI-XVIITH CENTURIES).","authors":"N. Davydenko","doi":"10.20535/2617-5339.2022.9.258494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on the study of Latin social-legal terms used for denoting the socio-legal status of the inhabitants of Ukrainian lands in the 16-17th centuries. After terms analysis the basic milestones of formation of terminology on designation of the social and legal status in that period are briefly considered. It was established that the main markers for determining the socio-legal status of a person in the 16-17th centuries, in addition to ethnic and religious affiliation were: higher and lower status (inferior, superior, minor, major, sublimus, nobilis, famatus, honorabilis, discretus, majestas), definition of the status according to the sphere of activity and the opportunity to be involved in others, which was also due to the distinction between \"free\" people and \"not free, slaves\" (laboratus, liber, illiber, proprius, mancipius, servus, famulus). In the context of this group of terms, the variety of the free person status is observed, depending on how such a status was acquired: a slave owned from birth, \"acquired\" slave-servant, slave, and so on. Therefore, documents often provide a definition that indicates whether the employee is employed (famulі serviles, servі apreciati). Also important was the presence or absence of the city status or suburban residency, which is especially relevant for residents of large cities, where there was a more or less implemented component of local self-government, which was often important in the field of law (civis, suburbanus, inhabitans urbis/oppidi comparing with rural residents such as rusticus, vagus). It is noteworthy that the documentation certifies the definition of financial and economic potential of a person or group (personae obtentae, possessionatae, possessae, mendicus, pauper, homo otiosus, homo vagabundi, pedanus, kmeto). Equally important in the context of the already mentioned ethnic and religious affiliation was also belonging to an ethnic community, group (congregatio), as well as the level and position in it (senior, major).\nKeywords: social and legal status; law term; social term; Latin terminology; Ukrainian documentation of the XVI-XVIIth centuries.","PeriodicalId":404912,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Linguistics","volume":"167 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20535/2617-5339.2022.9.258494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article focuses on the study of Latin social-legal terms used for denoting the socio-legal status of the inhabitants of Ukrainian lands in the 16-17th centuries. After terms analysis the basic milestones of formation of terminology on designation of the social and legal status in that period are briefly considered. It was established that the main markers for determining the socio-legal status of a person in the 16-17th centuries, in addition to ethnic and religious affiliation were: higher and lower status (inferior, superior, minor, major, sublimus, nobilis, famatus, honorabilis, discretus, majestas), definition of the status according to the sphere of activity and the opportunity to be involved in others, which was also due to the distinction between "free" people and "not free, slaves" (laboratus, liber, illiber, proprius, mancipius, servus, famulus). In the context of this group of terms, the variety of the free person status is observed, depending on how such a status was acquired: a slave owned from birth, "acquired" slave-servant, slave, and so on. Therefore, documents often provide a definition that indicates whether the employee is employed (famulі serviles, servі apreciati). Also important was the presence or absence of the city status or suburban residency, which is especially relevant for residents of large cities, where there was a more or less implemented component of local self-government, which was often important in the field of law (civis, suburbanus, inhabitans urbis/oppidi comparing with rural residents such as rusticus, vagus). It is noteworthy that the documentation certifies the definition of financial and economic potential of a person or group (personae obtentae, possessionatae, possessae, mendicus, pauper, homo otiosus, homo vagabundi, pedanus, kmeto). Equally important in the context of the already mentioned ethnic and religious affiliation was also belonging to an ethnic community, group (congregatio), as well as the level and position in it (senior, major). Keywords: social and legal status; law term; social term; Latin terminology; Ukrainian documentation of the XVI-XVIIth centuries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在乌克兰文件中表示社会法律地位的拉丁语(十六至十六世纪)。
本文着重研究16-17世纪用于表示乌克兰土地上居民的社会法律地位的拉丁社会法律术语。在对术语进行分析的基础上,对这一时期社会法律地位称谓术语形成的基本里程碑进行了简要评述。在16-17世纪,确定一个人的社会法律地位的主要标志,除了种族和宗教信仰外,还包括:更高和更低的地位(低等,上级,次要,主要,崇高,贵族,famatus,荣誉,离散,majestas),根据活动范围和参与他人的机会对地位进行定义,这也是由于“自由”人与“不自由,奴隶”(laboratus, liber, illiber, proprius, mancipius, servus, famulus)之间的区别。在这组术语的上下文中,可以观察到自由人地位的多样性,这取决于这种地位是如何获得的:从出生起就拥有的奴隶,“获得的”奴隶仆人,奴隶等等。因此,文档通常提供一个定义,表明雇员是否被雇用(家庭佣人,佣人感激)。同样重要的是城市地位或郊区居住的存在与否,这与大城市的居民特别相关,在那里或多或少地实施了地方自治的组成部分,这在法律领域通常很重要(civil, suburbanus, inhabitans urbis/oppidi与农村居民如rusticus, vagus相比)。值得注意的是,文件证明了个人或群体(personae obtentae, possession, possession, mendicus, pauper, homo otiosus, homo vagabundi, pedanus, kmeto)的财务和经济潜力的定义。在已经提到的种族和宗教关系方面,同样重要的是属于一个种族社区、群体(会众),以及在其中的级别和职位(高级、专业)。关键词:社会法律地位;法律术语;社会一词;拉丁术语;十六至十七世纪的乌克兰文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE LINGUISTIC STATUS OF IDEATION IN STARTUP DISCOURSE UNRAVELLING THE ART OF DECOMPRESSING ENGLISH-LANGUAGE SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL TEXTS IN UKRAINIAN TRANSLATIONS TYPOLOGY OF HUMOR-CREATING MEANS IN THE BIOGRAPHICAL NARRATIVE (A STUDY OF BORIS JOHNSON’S “THE CHURCHILL FACTOR. HOW ONE MAN MADE HISTORY” AND ITS UKRAINIAN TRANSLATION) MUSIC OF NAMES IN EDGAR ALAN POE’S WORKS PERSONAL POTENTIAL AS A PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PEDAGOGICAL PROBLEM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1