From liberal to multiculturalist nationalism: Confronting autocratic nationalism

Eric Cheng
{"title":"From liberal to multiculturalist nationalism: Confronting autocratic nationalism","authors":"Eric Cheng","doi":"10.1177/01914537221107406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reconsiders liberal nationalism in light of the current autocratic nationalist threat. I argue that liberal nationalism cannot redress the social ailments which acclimatize people to the sorts of no-holds-barred political contestation favoured by autocratic nationalists – excessive polarization. I then argue that liberal nationalists do not recognize the degree to which ‘in-group’ racial solidarity motivates members of the racial/ethnic majority to preserve their status, and that the liberal nationalist approach to defending minorities’ rights therefore risks either emboldening the majority to embrace autocracy or consolidating social hierarchies between the majority and minorities. On these bases, I show that democrats must seek to not only detach race/ethnicity from nationality but also redress those problematic racial/ethnic hierarchies. This suggests the need to develop liberal nationalism into multiculturalist nationalism. Multiculturalist nationalism, however, promises a sort of bounded solidarity that does not include all citizens: it makes use of targeted political antagonism against anti-democrats like White supremacists and Identitarians to help diffuse any social antagonism that might exist among minorities, inclusive members of the majority, and cultural conservatives.","PeriodicalId":339635,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy & Social Criticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537221107406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reconsiders liberal nationalism in light of the current autocratic nationalist threat. I argue that liberal nationalism cannot redress the social ailments which acclimatize people to the sorts of no-holds-barred political contestation favoured by autocratic nationalists – excessive polarization. I then argue that liberal nationalists do not recognize the degree to which ‘in-group’ racial solidarity motivates members of the racial/ethnic majority to preserve their status, and that the liberal nationalist approach to defending minorities’ rights therefore risks either emboldening the majority to embrace autocracy or consolidating social hierarchies between the majority and minorities. On these bases, I show that democrats must seek to not only detach race/ethnicity from nationality but also redress those problematic racial/ethnic hierarchies. This suggests the need to develop liberal nationalism into multiculturalist nationalism. Multiculturalist nationalism, however, promises a sort of bounded solidarity that does not include all citizens: it makes use of targeted political antagonism against anti-democrats like White supremacists and Identitarians to help diffuse any social antagonism that might exist among minorities, inclusive members of the majority, and cultural conservatives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从自由民族主义到多元文化民族主义:对抗专制民族主义
本文在当前专制民族主义威胁的背景下,重新审视了自由民族主义。我认为,自由民族主义不能纠正社会弊病,这种弊病使人们习惯于专制民族主义者所青睐的那种无拘无束的政治斗争——过度的两极分化。然后我认为,自由民族主义者没有认识到“群体内”的种族团结在多大程度上激励了多数种族/民族成员保持自己的地位,因此,自由民族主义者捍卫少数民族权利的方法可能会让多数人更大胆地拥抱专制,也可能会巩固多数人和少数人之间的社会等级制度。在这些基础上,我表明,民主人士不仅必须寻求将种族/民族与国籍分离开来,而且还必须纠正那些有问题的种族/民族等级制度。这表明有必要将自由民族主义发展为多元文化民族主义。然而,多元文化民族主义承诺了一种不包括所有公民的有限团结:它利用针对白人至上主义者和身份认同主义者等反民主主义者的有针对性的政治对抗,来帮助扩散可能存在于少数群体、多数群体的包容性成员和文化保守派之间的任何社会对抗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Constitutional Essentials: Does it meet the realist critique? Constitutional liberalism through thick and thin: Reflections on Frank Michelman’s constitutional essentials The ethics of knowledge production and the problem of global knowledge inequality Linguistic domination: A republican approach to linguistic justice From the age of immanence to the autonomy of the political: (Post)operaismo in theory and practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1