Public Intimacy and Kinship in the Korean Adoption Community

Kimberly D. Mckee
{"title":"Public Intimacy and Kinship in the Korean Adoption Community","authors":"Kimberly D. Mckee","doi":"10.5406/womgenfamcol.8.1.0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Korean children represent the largest group of international, transracial adoptees in the United States, and the majority of these children enter white families. Since the 1980s, adoptive families and children have become engaged with one another through culture (or heritage) camps, local and national adoption organizations, adoption agency postadoption services, adoption list-serves, and adoption-related Facebook groups. The emergence of an adult adoptee community coincided with these connections between adoptive parents and their children. Yet these communities—adoptive parents and adult adoptees—do not exist in isolation from one another. To better understand how the two communities operate in concert and conversation together, this essay examines the role of the annual Korean Adoption Conference (KAC)—operated by a national organization dedicated to supporting the Korean adoption community—in the lives of Korean adult adoptees and the adoptive parents of Korean children. Drawing from survey data of adult Korean adoptees and adoptive parents of Korean adoptees and a collection of oral histories of those involved in the KAC as attendees, speakers, and/or leaders, this article explores the implications of forging community across the adoption constellation. By placing these voices in conversation with one another, this essay contributes to new knowledges concerning the value of listening and learning from one another as a mechanism to engender change in mainstream conversations and debates concerning adoption. I elucidate how the KAC is a site for adoptees and their adoptive families to contest what it means to be in community or kinship with one another through the development of public intimacies. In doing so, I explore what it means to cultivate an intentional space for adoptees and adoptive parents to engage one another and disentangle assumptions that there is a monolithic adoptee or adoptive parent experience.","PeriodicalId":223911,"journal":{"name":"Women, Gender, and Families of Color","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women, Gender, and Families of Color","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/womgenfamcol.8.1.0040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:Korean children represent the largest group of international, transracial adoptees in the United States, and the majority of these children enter white families. Since the 1980s, adoptive families and children have become engaged with one another through culture (or heritage) camps, local and national adoption organizations, adoption agency postadoption services, adoption list-serves, and adoption-related Facebook groups. The emergence of an adult adoptee community coincided with these connections between adoptive parents and their children. Yet these communities—adoptive parents and adult adoptees—do not exist in isolation from one another. To better understand how the two communities operate in concert and conversation together, this essay examines the role of the annual Korean Adoption Conference (KAC)—operated by a national organization dedicated to supporting the Korean adoption community—in the lives of Korean adult adoptees and the adoptive parents of Korean children. Drawing from survey data of adult Korean adoptees and adoptive parents of Korean adoptees and a collection of oral histories of those involved in the KAC as attendees, speakers, and/or leaders, this article explores the implications of forging community across the adoption constellation. By placing these voices in conversation with one another, this essay contributes to new knowledges concerning the value of listening and learning from one another as a mechanism to engender change in mainstream conversations and debates concerning adoption. I elucidate how the KAC is a site for adoptees and their adoptive families to contest what it means to be in community or kinship with one another through the development of public intimacies. In doing so, I explore what it means to cultivate an intentional space for adoptees and adoptive parents to engage one another and disentangle assumptions that there is a monolithic adoptee or adoptive parent experience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国收养社会的公共亲密和亲属关系
摘要:韩国儿童是美国最大的跨国、跨种族被收养儿童群体,这些儿童中的大多数进入白人家庭。自20世纪80年代以来,收养家庭和孩子们通过文化(或遗产)营地、地方和国家收养组织、收养机构收养后服务、收养名单服务和收养相关的Facebook小组相互接触。成年被收养者社区的出现与养父母和他们的孩子之间的这些联系是一致的。然而,这些群体——养父母和成年被收养者——并不是彼此孤立存在的。为了更好地理解这两个群体是如何协调和对话的,本文考察了一年一度的韩国收养会议(KAC)在韩国成年被收养者和韩国儿童的养父母的生活中所起的作用。KAC由一个致力于支持韩国收养社区的全国性组织运营。根据对成年韩国被收养者和韩国被收养者的养父母的调查数据,以及作为参与者、演讲者和/或领导者的KAC参与者的口述历史,本文探讨了在收养群体中形成社区的含义。通过将这些声音置于彼此之间的对话中,本文有助于了解倾听和相互学习的价值,并将其作为一种机制,在有关收养的主流对话和辩论中产生变化。我阐明卡茨是一个被收养的孤儿和收养他们的家庭在社区或比赛意味着什么亲属关系彼此通过发展公共亲密。在这样做的过程中,我探索了为被收养者和养父母营造一个有意识的空间,让他们相互接触,并解开存在一个单一的被收养者或养父母经历的假设,这意味着什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"She's Been Doing Everything Right": Mothers of Color and Economic Violence Erased by Respectability: The Intersections of AIDS, Race, and Gender in Black America Introduction: In memoriam: bell hooks, 1952–2021 Challenging Misrepresentations of Black Womanhood: Media, Literature and Theory Labor Organizer Nannie Helen Burroughs and Her National Training School for Women and Girls
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1