Voltage maps simplify electric circuit analysis

B. Zoghi, T. C. Lyster, R. Puckett
{"title":"Voltage maps simplify electric circuit analysis","authors":"B. Zoghi, T. C. Lyster, R. Puckett","doi":"10.1109/SECON.1994.324294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pioneering work over 50 years ago by M.I.T. faculty who wrote textbooks for the study of electrical sciences set the pattern for the study of electric circuits in the United States. Authors who developed textbooks after those early works largely followed the techniques advanced there. This paper extends the analytical procedures adopted for identifying current direction and voltage polarities in a circuit. While the M.I.T. works adopted an arrow to indicate current direction, a similar arrow symbol for voltage was not adopted. Double subscript notation identifying nodes and relative polarity was used instead. This notation has contributed to confusion of students who are learning electric circuits. A simpler designation of voltage polarity by an open-head arrow promotes a better understanding of electric circuit operation. This paper proposes the use of a closed-head arrow for current direction, and an open-head arrow for a voltage rise between nodes. In this method all voltages are rises only. All voltages can be drawn in a voltage map of a circuit, using open-head arrows to show both voltage rises from sources of emf and voltage rises across resistors caused by Ohm's law relationships. This proposed method for identifying voltages corresponds with the node voltage polarity terminology used to interpret results from computer software programs such as PSPICE. A consistent conformity with symbols in circuit analysis is an enhancement to learning for the beginning student of electric circuit analysis. The voltage map is such a learning enhancement.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":119615,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of SOUTHEASTCON '94","volume":"118 21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of SOUTHEASTCON '94","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SECON.1994.324294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The pioneering work over 50 years ago by M.I.T. faculty who wrote textbooks for the study of electrical sciences set the pattern for the study of electric circuits in the United States. Authors who developed textbooks after those early works largely followed the techniques advanced there. This paper extends the analytical procedures adopted for identifying current direction and voltage polarities in a circuit. While the M.I.T. works adopted an arrow to indicate current direction, a similar arrow symbol for voltage was not adopted. Double subscript notation identifying nodes and relative polarity was used instead. This notation has contributed to confusion of students who are learning electric circuits. A simpler designation of voltage polarity by an open-head arrow promotes a better understanding of electric circuit operation. This paper proposes the use of a closed-head arrow for current direction, and an open-head arrow for a voltage rise between nodes. In this method all voltages are rises only. All voltages can be drawn in a voltage map of a circuit, using open-head arrows to show both voltage rises from sources of emf and voltage rises across resistors caused by Ohm's law relationships. This proposed method for identifying voltages corresponds with the node voltage polarity terminology used to interpret results from computer software programs such as PSPICE. A consistent conformity with symbols in circuit analysis is an enhancement to learning for the beginning student of electric circuit analysis. The voltage map is such a learning enhancement.<>
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电压图简化了电路分析
50多年前,麻省理工学院(mit)的教师们为电气科学研究编写了教科书,他们的开创性工作为美国的电路研究奠定了模式。在这些早期作品之后编写教科书的作者基本上遵循了那里先进的技术。本文扩展了用于识别电路中电流方向和电压极性的分析方法。虽然麻省理工学院的作品采用了一个箭头来表示电流方向,但没有采用类似的箭头符号来表示电压。使用双下标符号标识节点和相对极性。这种符号使学习电路的学生感到困惑。用开口箭头表示电压极性的简单方法有助于更好地理解电路的操作。本文提出用闭头箭头表示电流方向,用开头箭头表示节点间电压上升。在这种方法中,所有的电压都是上升的。所有电压都可以绘制在电路的电压图中,使用开口箭头来显示电动势源的电压上升和由欧姆定律关系引起的电阻电压上升。这种提出的电压识别方法与用于解释计算机软件程序(如PSPICE)结果的节点电压极性术语相对应。在电路分析中与符号的一致性是对电路分析初学者学习的一种增强。电压图就是这样一种学习增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The use of wavelet transform as a preprocessor for the neural network detection of EEG spikes An output unit for low frequency square wave electronic ballasts The IBM Personal Communicator-design considerations Accelerating conversations for fault-tolerant concurrent software Application of three dimensional image analysis to the mammalian cell nucleus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1