Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 13/PUU-XV/2017 Tentang Uji Materil Pasal 153 Ayat (1) Huruf F Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Ditinjau Dari Aspek Keadilan

Faqih Afif Ridlo, Abdul Qodir
{"title":"Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 13/PUU-XV/2017 Tentang Uji Materil Pasal 153 Ayat (1) Huruf F Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Ditinjau Dari Aspek Keadilan","authors":"Faqih Afif Ridlo, Abdul Qodir","doi":"10.15408/SICLJ.V3I2.13865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis study aims to find out the legal basis for the Constitutional Court's consideration in granting material judgments in Article 153 Paragraph (1) letter f of Law Number 13 Year 2003 concerning Labor that is considered to be contradictory to the 1945 Constitution Article 28B Paragraph (1) and Article 28D Paragraph (2) . In addition to knowing aspects of justice and benefits to the legal considerations of the Constitutional Court which grants the material test Article 153 Paragraph (1) letter f of Law Number 13 Year 2003 concerning Labor. This research method uses a normative juridical legal research approach, while the type of research used is qualitative analytical descriptive, and data collection techniques are library research. From this research it is known that the granting of the marriage of workers in one company is to safeguard the basic rights of workers, namely the right to work and also the right of family and continuing offspring, as stated in Article 28B Paragraph (1) and Article 28D Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. This is a form of fulfillment of the state of basic rights that must be possessed by all Indonesian people as a whole without exception as a form of justice.Keywords: Decision, Constitutional Court, Justice Aspects","PeriodicalId":299133,"journal":{"name":"STAATSRECHT: Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STAATSRECHT: Indonesian Constitutional Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/SICLJ.V3I2.13865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to find out the legal basis for the Constitutional Court's consideration in granting material judgments in Article 153 Paragraph (1) letter f of Law Number 13 Year 2003 concerning Labor that is considered to be contradictory to the 1945 Constitution Article 28B Paragraph (1) and Article 28D Paragraph (2) . In addition to knowing aspects of justice and benefits to the legal considerations of the Constitutional Court which grants the material test Article 153 Paragraph (1) letter f of Law Number 13 Year 2003 concerning Labor. This research method uses a normative juridical legal research approach, while the type of research used is qualitative analytical descriptive, and data collection techniques are library research. From this research it is known that the granting of the marriage of workers in one company is to safeguard the basic rights of workers, namely the right to work and also the right of family and continuing offspring, as stated in Article 28B Paragraph (1) and Article 28D Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. This is a form of fulfillment of the state of basic rights that must be possessed by all Indonesian people as a whole without exception as a form of justice.Keywords: Decision, Constitutional Court, Justice Aspects
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
摘要本研究旨在找出宪法法院对与1945年宪法第28条b款第(1)项和第28条d款第(2)项相矛盾的2003年第13号劳动法第153条第(1)项f字作出实质性判决的法律依据。除了了解司法方面的情况和有利于宪法法院的法律考虑之外,宪法法院还对2003年关于劳工的第13号法律第153条第(1)款f项进行了实质性的测试。本研究方法采用规范的司法法律研究方法,而使用的研究类型是定性分析描述性的,数据收集技术是图书馆研究。从这项研究中可以知道,在一个公司中允许工人结婚是为了维护工人的基本权利,即工作权,以及家庭和后代的权利,如1945年宪法第28B条第(1)款和第28D条第(2)款所述。这是实现全体印度尼西亚人民作为一个整体毫无例外地必须拥有的基本权利的一种形式,是一种正义的形式。关键词:判决,宪法法院,司法方面
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Complexity of Filling Regional Head Vacancies Prior to the 2024 General Election Centralized Governance Reform of the State Civil Apparatus Based on the Merit System and Law Number 5 of 2015 concerning the State Civil Apparatus Integration of the State Financial Supervision and Audit System in Public Legal Entities Aspects of Democratic Constitutionalism In The Appointment of Acting Regional Heads Pancasila as the basis and paradigm of the national legal system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1