Developing an Instrument to Assess EFL Learners’ Critical Thinking Skills in Writing Expository Problem-Solution Essays

Jumariati Jumariati, Eka Puteri Elyani, Nawal Nawal, Suci Larasati
{"title":"Developing an Instrument to Assess EFL Learners’ Critical Thinking Skills in Writing Expository Problem-Solution Essays","authors":"Jumariati Jumariati, Eka Puteri Elyani, Nawal Nawal, Suci Larasati","doi":"10.37745/ijelt.13/vol10n53037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning activities that utilize a problem-solving approach are an effort to train students' critical thinking skills. However, to determine the success of learning that develops students' critical thinking skills, teachers should be able to measure the skills using the right instrument. This study is aimed to develop an assessment instrument to measure EFL learners’ critical thinking skills in writing expository problem-solution essays. The participants of the study were advanced students of Academic Writing who participated in the pilot study small and large scales. The analysis found that the scores yielded by the two raters were valid and reliable (r value obtained was .987 and α value for each component was higher than r table .320). Furthermore, the score on each component of assessment namely the depth of analysis was .640, the feasibility of solution was .667, the logic of argument was .795 and the use of evidence was .908. These scores are greater than the R table which means that the scores are valid. This suggests that the test instrument and the scoring rubric can be used in assessing EFL students’ critical thinking skills particularly on the ability to analyze an issue, propose suitable solution, provide logic argument, and use of relevant evidence.","PeriodicalId":231165,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of English Language Teaching","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37745/ijelt.13/vol10n53037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Learning activities that utilize a problem-solving approach are an effort to train students' critical thinking skills. However, to determine the success of learning that develops students' critical thinking skills, teachers should be able to measure the skills using the right instrument. This study is aimed to develop an assessment instrument to measure EFL learners’ critical thinking skills in writing expository problem-solution essays. The participants of the study were advanced students of Academic Writing who participated in the pilot study small and large scales. The analysis found that the scores yielded by the two raters were valid and reliable (r value obtained was .987 and α value for each component was higher than r table .320). Furthermore, the score on each component of assessment namely the depth of analysis was .640, the feasibility of solution was .667, the logic of argument was .795 and the use of evidence was .908. These scores are greater than the R table which means that the scores are valid. This suggests that the test instrument and the scoring rubric can be used in assessing EFL students’ critical thinking skills particularly on the ability to analyze an issue, propose suitable solution, provide logic argument, and use of relevant evidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发一种工具来评估英语学习者在写作解释性问题解决性文章中的批判性思维能力
利用解决问题方法的学习活动是培养学生批判性思维能力的一种努力。然而,为了确定培养学生批判性思维技能的学习是否成功,教师应该能够使用正确的工具来衡量这些技能。本研究旨在开发一种评估工具,以衡量英语学习者在撰写说明文性问题解决性文章时的批判性思维能力。该研究的参与者是学术写作的高级学生,他们参加了小型和大型的试点研究。分析发现,两种评价者得出的评分是有效可靠的(r值为0.987,各成分的α值均高于r表0.320)。此外,评估的每个组成部分即分析深度得分为0.640,解决方案的可行性得分为0.667,论证逻辑得分为0.795,证据使用得分为0.908。这些分数大于R表,这意味着分数是有效的。这表明测试工具和评分标准可以用来评估英语学生的批判性思维技能,特别是分析问题、提出合适的解决方案、提供逻辑论证和使用相关证据的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Listening and Speaking Activities An Investigation of Cultural Sensitivity and Teachers’ Classroom Management To What Extent Are Listening and Speaking Tasks Through Textbooks Aligned with the Communicative Approach? Teachers’ Attitude Resources in Translation Teaching from the Perspective of Appraisal Theory The Effects of Using the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) on the Fundamental English Classes of Thai EFL Learners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1