{"title":"温室における燃焼式蓄熱型二酸化炭素施肥システムの省エネルギー性・環境負荷低減性・経済性評価","authors":"川村 淳浩, 秋澤 淳, 柏木 孝夫","doi":"10.2525/SHITA.17.205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated three types of combustion type CO2 fertilization systems: The thermal storage type (excess heat energy is stored and used for heating), the heat waste type (excess heat is discharged outdoors), and the diffusion type (excess heat is discharged indoors). We analyzed the validity, energy-conserving, environmental load-reducing, and cost-reducing characteristics of these types, and reached the following conclusions.1)The excess heat generated by combustion type CO2 fertilization accounted for several percentages of the daily cumulative solar irradiation during the intermediate period under the standard condition in this study (amount of CO2 fertilization,48 g (CO2) m-2d-1). The thermal storage type is expected to prevent the aggravation of the thermal/humidity environment in the greenhouse and decrease the efficiency of supplied CO2.2)Using the thermal storage type,a maximal energy conservation of 8% and a reduction in CO2 discharge can be expected in large greenhouses (annual energy consumption in the entire greenhouse, about 3 GWh) under the standard conditions of this study (summer/intermediate period ratio, 0.33; thermal storage/discharge efficiency, 0.8).3)The unit cost of CO2 fertilization using this thermal storage type was about 25 yen kg-1 (during depreciation) and about 12 yen kg-1 (after depreciation) under the standard conditions of this study (summer/intermediate period ratio, 0.33; price of unit quantity of heat, 5.5 yen kWh-1; thermal storage/discharge efficiency, 0.8). To reduce the unit cost of CO2fertilization, improvement in thermal storage/discharge efficiency, a decrease in fuel cost, and an increase in the number of days in operation during the intermediate period are necessary.","PeriodicalId":315038,"journal":{"name":"Shokubutsu Kankyo Kogaku","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shokubutsu Kankyo Kogaku","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2525/SHITA.17.205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluated three types of combustion type CO2 fertilization systems: The thermal storage type (excess heat energy is stored and used for heating), the heat waste type (excess heat is discharged outdoors), and the diffusion type (excess heat is discharged indoors). We analyzed the validity, energy-conserving, environmental load-reducing, and cost-reducing characteristics of these types, and reached the following conclusions.1)The excess heat generated by combustion type CO2 fertilization accounted for several percentages of the daily cumulative solar irradiation during the intermediate period under the standard condition in this study (amount of CO2 fertilization,48 g (CO2) m-2d-1). The thermal storage type is expected to prevent the aggravation of the thermal/humidity environment in the greenhouse and decrease the efficiency of supplied CO2.2)Using the thermal storage type,a maximal energy conservation of 8% and a reduction in CO2 discharge can be expected in large greenhouses (annual energy consumption in the entire greenhouse, about 3 GWh) under the standard conditions of this study (summer/intermediate period ratio, 0.33; thermal storage/discharge efficiency, 0.8).3)The unit cost of CO2 fertilization using this thermal storage type was about 25 yen kg-1 (during depreciation) and about 12 yen kg-1 (after depreciation) under the standard conditions of this study (summer/intermediate period ratio, 0.33; price of unit quantity of heat, 5.5 yen kWh-1; thermal storage/discharge efficiency, 0.8). To reduce the unit cost of CO2fertilization, improvement in thermal storage/discharge efficiency, a decrease in fuel cost, and an increase in the number of days in operation during the intermediate period are necessary.
本研究评价了三种燃烧型CO2施肥系统:蓄热型(储存多余热能用于加热)、余热型(将多余热量排放到室外)和扩散型(将多余热量排放到室内)。研究结果表明:①在本研究标准条件下(CO2施肥量为48 g (CO2) m-2d-1),燃烧型CO2施肥产生的余热占中期日累积太阳辐照量的几个百分比;蓄热式可防止温室热湿环境恶化,降低供气CO2效率2.2)在本研究标准条件下(夏季/中期比0.33;3)在本研究标准条件下(夏季/中期比0.33),采用该蓄热方式CO2施肥的单位成本约为25日元kg-1(折旧期间),约为12日元kg-1(折旧后);单位热量价格5.5日元kWh-1;蓄热/放热效率0.8)。为了降低co2施肥的单位成本,必须提高蓄热/排放效率,降低燃料成本,增加中间阶段的运行天数。