Challenges and Best Practices for Recovering Stuck Coiled Tubing Pipe Conveying a Cable

S. Hassig Fonseca, Richard Torres, Zhanke Liu, F. Jahn, G. Tagarot, S. Baca, H. Guevara, J. Botan, C. Villacres, J. Boas
{"title":"Challenges and Best Practices for Recovering Stuck Coiled Tubing Pipe Conveying a Cable","authors":"S. Hassig Fonseca, Richard Torres, Zhanke Liu, F. Jahn, G. Tagarot, S. Baca, H. Guevara, J. Botan, C. Villacres, J. Boas","doi":"10.2523/iptc-23093-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Stuck coiled tubing (CT) is a main operational risk leading to delays, deferred production, or even loss of a well. Despite general commonalities, each CT recovery can face unique challenges including managing high pressure, working under limited spatial or lifting constraints, establishing well control, or handling a cable inside the CT.\n This study consolidates learnings and proposes a general workflow for a basic stuck pipe scenario, rig-up, recovery pressure control equipment and well control, CT free point evaluation, bottomhole assemblies (BHAs) and workflows for cutting and freeing the CT pipe downhole, and recovery of the CT at surface. A consolidation of published case studies provides specific examples of the hardware, workflows, and operational considerations. In addition, presentation of a recent case study extends the discussion to the challenges introduced by the presence of a cable in the stuck CT and its respective solution.\n This case study reviews the planning and execution of a CT recovery, including the use of decision trees to guide the decision-making process. It details fit-for-purpose hardware for safely anchoring the cable; packoffs for accessing, tensioning, and recovering it with slickline; an opening for deploying the wireline cutting BHA; and valves for pressure testing and well control. That workflow successfully freed 6,818 ft of stuck CT and allowed recovering the pipe without a workover rig on location, eliminating 11 days of rig time during subsequent tubing pulling. This is the first documented such recovery case worldwide based on a thorough literature review.","PeriodicalId":153269,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Thu, March 02, 2023","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Thu, March 02, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-23093-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stuck coiled tubing (CT) is a main operational risk leading to delays, deferred production, or even loss of a well. Despite general commonalities, each CT recovery can face unique challenges including managing high pressure, working under limited spatial or lifting constraints, establishing well control, or handling a cable inside the CT. This study consolidates learnings and proposes a general workflow for a basic stuck pipe scenario, rig-up, recovery pressure control equipment and well control, CT free point evaluation, bottomhole assemblies (BHAs) and workflows for cutting and freeing the CT pipe downhole, and recovery of the CT at surface. A consolidation of published case studies provides specific examples of the hardware, workflows, and operational considerations. In addition, presentation of a recent case study extends the discussion to the challenges introduced by the presence of a cable in the stuck CT and its respective solution. This case study reviews the planning and execution of a CT recovery, including the use of decision trees to guide the decision-making process. It details fit-for-purpose hardware for safely anchoring the cable; packoffs for accessing, tensioning, and recovering it with slickline; an opening for deploying the wireline cutting BHA; and valves for pressure testing and well control. That workflow successfully freed 6,818 ft of stuck CT and allowed recovering the pipe without a workover rig on location, eliminating 11 days of rig time during subsequent tubing pulling. This is the first documented such recovery case worldwide based on a thorough literature review.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恢复卡钻连续油管输送电缆的挑战和最佳实践
连续油管卡钻是导致油井延迟、延迟生产甚至漏井的主要作业风险。尽管具有共性,但每一种连续油管采油都面临着独特的挑战,包括高压管理、有限空间或提升限制、建立井控或处理连续油管内的电缆。该研究巩固了学习成果,并提出了基本卡钻情况的一般工作流程,包括起吊、恢复压力控制设备和井控、连续油管空闲点评估、底部钻具组合(bha)以及井下连续油管切割和释放以及地面连续油管回收的工作流程。已发布的案例研究的整合提供了硬件、工作流和操作注意事项的具体示例。此外,介绍了最近的一个案例研究,将讨论扩展到卡钻CT中存在电缆所带来的挑战以及相应的解决方案。本案例研究回顾了连续油管恢复的计划和执行,包括使用决策树来指导决策过程。它详细介绍了用于安全锚固电缆的专用硬件;封隔器用于下入、拉紧和使用钢丝回收;为部署电缆切割底部钻具组合提供了空间;以及用于压力测试和井控的阀门。该工作流程成功地释放了6818英尺的CT卡钻,无需修井机即可回收油管,在随后的拔油管过程中节省了11天的钻机时间。这是世界上第一个基于全面文献回顾的此类恢复病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advancement of Open Hole Gravel Pack and Zonal Isolation with Selective Intelligent Completion in Deepwater Malaysia Reaching Beyond the Limit, the Furthest Step Out S Shape Wells in Deep Gas Well Project Application and Performance Monitoring of Compound Air Plasma Lightning Rejection System Malaysia's First Use of Subsea Release Plug System for Dual Barrier Offline Cementing (DBOC) Across Hydrocarbon Section Helps Streamline Activities Drilling Weak Formations in Rumaila Field in Southern Iraq — Modelling Shear Failure Using Numerical Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1