{"title":"Comparison of Healing of Allograft and Autogenous Bone Implanted in the Skull Defect of Beagle Dog: Preliminary Animal Study","authors":"Jung-Gon Lee, Sang-Yun Kim, P. Yun, Young-Kyun Kim","doi":"10.32542/implantology.20180006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Copyright © 2018. The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. OPEN ACCESS Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the healing process af ter autogenous and allogenous bone grafts for calvarial bone defects in beagles. Materials and Methods: Two defects were formed in the skulls of two beagles and then grafted with a f reeze-dried bone allograf t (Double-Oss) and an autogenous bone chip, respectively. The clinical, radiographic, and histomorphometric examination results of the specimens taken 4 and 8 weeks after bone grafting were analyzed. Results: The clinical, radiographic, and histological assessments revealed that 4 and 8 weeks after transplant, the beagle that received an autogenous bone graft was more likely to have high new bone formation than the beagle that had an allogenous bone. Four weeks after the transplant, the proportions of new bone formation were 11.5% and 35.8% in the allogenous and autogenous bones, respectively. Eight weeks af ter the transplant, the proportion of new bone formation with the allogenous bone increased significantly to 41.4% but was still less than the 65.6% with the autogenous bone. Conclusion: The amount of new bone formation was smaller and the formation rate was slower with allogenous bone graft than with autogenous bone graft.","PeriodicalId":370954,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.20180006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
同种异体骨与自体骨移植修复比格犬颅骨缺损的初步动物研究
版权所有©2018。韩国口腔颌面种植学会这是一篇基于知识共享署名非商业许可(http://creativecommons)的开放获取文章。(http://www.licenses/bync/4.0/),允许在任何媒介上不受限制地进行非商业使用、分发和复制,前提是正确引用原始作品。开放获取目的:本研究的目的是评估小猎犬颅骨骨缺损自体和异体骨移植后的愈合过程。材料与方法:在2只小猎犬的颅骨上形成2个缺损,分别用同种异体冻干骨移植体(Double-Oss)和自体骨芯片进行骨移植。分析植骨后4周和8周标本的临床、影像学和组织形态学检查结果。结果:临床、影像学和组织学评估显示,移植后4周和8周,接受自体骨移植的小猎犬比接受同种异体骨移植的小猎犬更有可能有较高的新骨形成。移植后4周,异体骨和自体骨的新骨成形率分别为11.5%和35.8%。移植后8周,同种异体骨的新骨形成比例显著增加至41.4%,但仍低于自体骨的65.6%。结论:与自体骨移植相比,同种异体骨移植的新生骨形成量更少,形成速度更慢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。